利益相关者挖掘及其在新闻比较中的应用

Tatsuya Ogawa, Qiang Ma, Masatoshi Yoshikawa
{"title":"利益相关者挖掘及其在新闻比较中的应用","authors":"Tatsuya Ogawa, Qiang Ma, Masatoshi Yoshikawa","doi":"10.1109/WI-IAT.2010.156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose a novel stakeholder mining mechanism for analyzing bias in news articles by comparing descriptions of stakeholders. Our mechanism is based on the presumption that interests often induce bias of news agencies. As we use the term, a ``stakeholder'' is a participant in an event described in a news article who should have some relationships with other participants in the article. Our approach attempts to elucidate bias of articles from three aspects: stakeholders, interests of stakeholders, and the descriptive polarity of each stakeholder. Mining of stakeholders and their interests is achieved by analysis of sentence structure and the use of Relationship WordNet, a lexical resource that we developed. For analyzing polarities of stakeholder descriptions, we propose an opinion mining method based on the lexical resource Senti WordNet. We also describe an application system we developed for news comparison based on the mining mechanism. This paper presents a user study to validate the proposed methods.","PeriodicalId":340211,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stakeholder Mining and Its Application to News Comparison\",\"authors\":\"Tatsuya Ogawa, Qiang Ma, Masatoshi Yoshikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WI-IAT.2010.156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we propose a novel stakeholder mining mechanism for analyzing bias in news articles by comparing descriptions of stakeholders. Our mechanism is based on the presumption that interests often induce bias of news agencies. As we use the term, a ``stakeholder'' is a participant in an event described in a news article who should have some relationships with other participants in the article. Our approach attempts to elucidate bias of articles from three aspects: stakeholders, interests of stakeholders, and the descriptive polarity of each stakeholder. Mining of stakeholders and their interests is achieved by analysis of sentence structure and the use of Relationship WordNet, a lexical resource that we developed. For analyzing polarities of stakeholder descriptions, we propose an opinion mining method based on the lexical resource Senti WordNet. We also describe an application system we developed for news comparison based on the mining mechanism. This paper presents a user study to validate the proposed methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2010.156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2010.156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种新的利益相关者挖掘机制,通过比较利益相关者的描述来分析新闻文章中的偏见。我们的机制是基于利益往往导致新闻机构偏见的假设。当我们使用术语时,“涉众”是新闻文章中描述的事件的参与者,他应该与文章中的其他参与者有一些关系。我们的方法试图从三个方面阐明文章的偏见:利益相关者,利益相关者的利益,以及每个利益相关者的描述极性。通过分析句子结构和使用我们开发的词汇资源Relationship WordNet,可以挖掘涉众及其兴趣。为了分析利益相关者描述的极性,我们提出了一种基于词汇资源Senti WordNet的意见挖掘方法。本文还介绍了基于挖掘机制开发的新闻比较应用系统。本文提出了一个用户研究来验证所提出的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stakeholder Mining and Its Application to News Comparison
In this paper, we propose a novel stakeholder mining mechanism for analyzing bias in news articles by comparing descriptions of stakeholders. Our mechanism is based on the presumption that interests often induce bias of news agencies. As we use the term, a ``stakeholder'' is a participant in an event described in a news article who should have some relationships with other participants in the article. Our approach attempts to elucidate bias of articles from three aspects: stakeholders, interests of stakeholders, and the descriptive polarity of each stakeholder. Mining of stakeholders and their interests is achieved by analysis of sentence structure and the use of Relationship WordNet, a lexical resource that we developed. For analyzing polarities of stakeholder descriptions, we propose an opinion mining method based on the lexical resource Senti WordNet. We also describe an application system we developed for news comparison based on the mining mechanism. This paper presents a user study to validate the proposed methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Game Theory for Security: Lessons Learned from Deployed Applications A Decision Rule Method for Assessing the Completeness and Consistency of a Data Warehouse Semantic Structure Content for Dynamic Web Pages Enhancing the Performance of Metadata Service for Cloud Computing Improving Diversity of Focused Summaries through the Negative Endorsements of Redundant Facts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1