欺诈检测机器学习技术的算法方法:比较分析

D. Mitra, Shikha Gupta, Pawandeep Kaur
{"title":"欺诈检测机器学习技术的算法方法:比较分析","authors":"D. Mitra, Shikha Gupta, Pawandeep Kaur","doi":"10.1109/ITSS-IoE53029.2021.9615349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fraud using credit cards is still rife today, and the modes are increasingly varied. To avoid scams with various ways of credit cards, we must identify and find out what methods are often used by fraudsters. The comparative analysis depicts that the parameters, i.e., Precision/Recall and F1-Score the K-Nearest Neighbor, are better for detecting fraudulent transactions than the Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes. However, the accuracy is marginal high of Logistic Regression, but the False Positive parameters cannot identify the imbalanced data; therefore, they disguise the results and accuracy of Logistic Regression and K--Nearest Neighbor deems fit for such cases. Kaggle Dataset for fraud detection has been used to experiment. Therefore, under the scheme, we used various models of machine learning models based on classification and Regression. The results show that the K--Nearest Neighbor is the better approach for detecting fraudulent transactions than the Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes.","PeriodicalId":230566,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Intelligent Technology, System and Service for Internet of Everything (ITSS-IoE)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Algorithmic Approach to Machine Learning Techniques for Fraud detection: A Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"D. Mitra, Shikha Gupta, Pawandeep Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITSS-IoE53029.2021.9615349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fraud using credit cards is still rife today, and the modes are increasingly varied. To avoid scams with various ways of credit cards, we must identify and find out what methods are often used by fraudsters. The comparative analysis depicts that the parameters, i.e., Precision/Recall and F1-Score the K-Nearest Neighbor, are better for detecting fraudulent transactions than the Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes. However, the accuracy is marginal high of Logistic Regression, but the False Positive parameters cannot identify the imbalanced data; therefore, they disguise the results and accuracy of Logistic Regression and K--Nearest Neighbor deems fit for such cases. Kaggle Dataset for fraud detection has been used to experiment. Therefore, under the scheme, we used various models of machine learning models based on classification and Regression. The results show that the K--Nearest Neighbor is the better approach for detecting fraudulent transactions than the Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":230566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Conference on Intelligent Technology, System and Service for Internet of Everything (ITSS-IoE)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Conference on Intelligent Technology, System and Service for Internet of Everything (ITSS-IoE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSS-IoE53029.2021.9615349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Intelligent Technology, System and Service for Internet of Everything (ITSS-IoE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSS-IoE53029.2021.9615349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

如今,使用信用卡进行诈骗仍然很普遍,而且诈骗方式也越来越多样化。为了避免各种信用卡诈骗,我们必须识别和找出骗子经常使用的方法。对比分析表明,与Logistic回归和Naïve贝叶斯相比,Precision/Recall和F1-Score The K-Nearest Neighbor这两个参数更适合检测欺诈交易。然而,逻辑回归的准确率较高,但假阳性参数不能识别不平衡数据;因此,它们掩盖了逻辑回归和K-最近邻认为适合这种情况的结果和准确性。用于欺诈检测的Kaggle数据集已被用于实验。因此,在该方案下,我们使用了基于分类和回归的各种机器学习模型。结果表明,K-最近邻是比逻辑回归和Naïve贝叶斯更好的检测欺诈交易的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Algorithmic Approach to Machine Learning Techniques for Fraud detection: A Comparative Analysis
Fraud using credit cards is still rife today, and the modes are increasingly varied. To avoid scams with various ways of credit cards, we must identify and find out what methods are often used by fraudsters. The comparative analysis depicts that the parameters, i.e., Precision/Recall and F1-Score the K-Nearest Neighbor, are better for detecting fraudulent transactions than the Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes. However, the accuracy is marginal high of Logistic Regression, but the False Positive parameters cannot identify the imbalanced data; therefore, they disguise the results and accuracy of Logistic Regression and K--Nearest Neighbor deems fit for such cases. Kaggle Dataset for fraud detection has been used to experiment. Therefore, under the scheme, we used various models of machine learning models based on classification and Regression. The results show that the K--Nearest Neighbor is the better approach for detecting fraudulent transactions than the Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Attendance Management System Using Facial Recognition and Image Augmentation Technique A Fuzzy GPSR Route Selection Based on Link Quality and Neighbor Node in VANET Program Abstract Book Ultra-Low Profile, Compact Quasi-Yagi Antenna Suitable for IoT Application ITSS-IoE 2021 Cover Page
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1