{"title":"Scale-Descale-Rescale -一种新兴的分析工具","authors":"Tahira Syed","doi":"10.53819/81018102t4116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding multi-scale interactions and their effects across spatial, temporal, and organizational scales are important aspects of designing effective environmental governance policies. Problems of scale are intrinsic to environmental governance, where managing natural resources across political jurisdictions and biophysical scales is a familiar theme in the complex human–environment relations (Cash et al. 2006, Newig & Moss, 2017). Some agreement has emerged that scale is fundamentally a relational concept that is socially constructed and both fluid and fixed (Norman et al. 2015) and must therefore be considered when analyzing effectiveness of environmental governance policies. However, what form such an analysis should take to accurately capture the multifaceted relations and interactions, remains an open question. Given that policies designed for environmental governance often carry objectives at larger geophysical scales of resource management, the design and implementation strategies of such policies must include better description of how different design aspects and implementation measures lead towards long-term sustainability and equitable outcomes (Syed & Choudhury, 2018).","PeriodicalId":430596,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Policy & Governance","volume":"04 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scale-Descale-Rescale – An Emerging Analytical Tool\",\"authors\":\"Tahira Syed\",\"doi\":\"10.53819/81018102t4116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding multi-scale interactions and their effects across spatial, temporal, and organizational scales are important aspects of designing effective environmental governance policies. Problems of scale are intrinsic to environmental governance, where managing natural resources across political jurisdictions and biophysical scales is a familiar theme in the complex human–environment relations (Cash et al. 2006, Newig & Moss, 2017). Some agreement has emerged that scale is fundamentally a relational concept that is socially constructed and both fluid and fixed (Norman et al. 2015) and must therefore be considered when analyzing effectiveness of environmental governance policies. However, what form such an analysis should take to accurately capture the multifaceted relations and interactions, remains an open question. Given that policies designed for environmental governance often carry objectives at larger geophysical scales of resource management, the design and implementation strategies of such policies must include better description of how different design aspects and implementation measures lead towards long-term sustainability and equitable outcomes (Syed & Choudhury, 2018).\",\"PeriodicalId\":430596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Policy & Governance\",\"volume\":\"04 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Policy & Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t4116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Policy & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t4116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
理解多尺度相互作用及其在空间、时间和组织尺度上的影响是设计有效环境治理政策的重要方面。规模问题是环境治理的内在问题,在复杂的人与环境关系中,跨政治管辖范围和生物物理尺度管理自然资源是一个熟悉的主题(Cash et al. 2006, Newig & Moss, 2017)。一些共识已经出现,即规模从根本上是一个社会建构的关系概念,既流动又固定(Norman et al. 2015),因此在分析环境治理政策的有效性时必须考虑规模。然而,这种分析应该采取什么样的形式才能准确地捕捉到多方面的关系和相互作用,仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。鉴于为环境治理而设计的政策往往具有更大的资源管理地球物理尺度的目标,此类政策的设计和实施策略必须包括更好地描述不同的设计方面和实施措施如何导致长期可持续性和公平的结果(Syed & Choudhury, 2018)。
Scale-Descale-Rescale – An Emerging Analytical Tool
Understanding multi-scale interactions and their effects across spatial, temporal, and organizational scales are important aspects of designing effective environmental governance policies. Problems of scale are intrinsic to environmental governance, where managing natural resources across political jurisdictions and biophysical scales is a familiar theme in the complex human–environment relations (Cash et al. 2006, Newig & Moss, 2017). Some agreement has emerged that scale is fundamentally a relational concept that is socially constructed and both fluid and fixed (Norman et al. 2015) and must therefore be considered when analyzing effectiveness of environmental governance policies. However, what form such an analysis should take to accurately capture the multifaceted relations and interactions, remains an open question. Given that policies designed for environmental governance often carry objectives at larger geophysical scales of resource management, the design and implementation strategies of such policies must include better description of how different design aspects and implementation measures lead towards long-term sustainability and equitable outcomes (Syed & Choudhury, 2018).