{"title":"然而责任就是责任,尽管他独自一人。“1967年《堕胎法》下是否应该有一个专家决策者来决定与良心反对权有关的问题?”","authors":"James E. Hurford","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2084950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘ … Yet a Duty is a Duty, Though he be Alone.’ Should There be a Specialist Decision Maker to Determine Issues Relating to the Right to Conscientious Objection Under the Abortion Act 1967?\",\"authors\":\"James E. Hurford\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2022.2084950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2084950\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2084950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
‘ … Yet a Duty is a Duty, Though he be Alone.’ Should There be a Specialist Decision Maker to Determine Issues Relating to the Right to Conscientious Objection Under the Abortion Act 1967?