需要还是恩典?公共当局遵守法院判决的要求

Imogen Sadler
{"title":"需要还是恩典?公共当局遵守法院判决的要求","authors":"Imogen Sadler","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2109404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. So said Lord Templeman, in M v Home Office, in what Lord Neuberger was later to describe as ‘characteristically colourful’ language. The title of this article may puzzle the reader, lawyer and lay person alike. The proposition that decisions of the Court must be followed within a democracy seems an obvious one. How else would the checks and balances within a democracy work? It would seem odd if, should a public body fail to comply with an order of a court, no mechanism would be in place to remedy that non-compliance.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Necessity or Grace? The Requirement for Public Authorities to Follow Decisions of the Courts\",\"authors\":\"Imogen Sadler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2022.2109404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. So said Lord Templeman, in M v Home Office, in what Lord Neuberger was later to describe as ‘characteristically colourful’ language. The title of this article may puzzle the reader, lawyer and lay person alike. The proposition that decisions of the Court must be followed within a democracy seems an obvious one. How else would the checks and balances within a democracy work? It would seem odd if, should a public body fail to comply with an order of a court, no mechanism would be in place to remedy that non-compliance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2109404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2109404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 这是坦普尔曼勋爵在诉内政部案中所说的话,后来纽伯格勋爵将其描述为“特色丰富”的语言。这篇文章的标题可能会使读者、律师和外行都感到困惑。法院的决定必须在民主国家内得到遵守这一主张似乎是显而易见的。否则民主国家内部的制衡如何发挥作用?如果一个公共机构不遵守法院的命令,却没有任何机制来纠正这种不遵守行为,这似乎很奇怪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Necessity or Grace? The Requirement for Public Authorities to Follow Decisions of the Courts
1. So said Lord Templeman, in M v Home Office, in what Lord Neuberger was later to describe as ‘characteristically colourful’ language. The title of this article may puzzle the reader, lawyer and lay person alike. The proposition that decisions of the Court must be followed within a democracy seems an obvious one. How else would the checks and balances within a democracy work? It would seem odd if, should a public body fail to comply with an order of a court, no mechanism would be in place to remedy that non-compliance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1