{"title":"同种异体材料牙周植入术中保留乳头瓣的应用。比较研究。","authors":"J W Kleinfelder, D E Lange","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>40 periodontal defects with probing depths of 5 mm in 10 patients were treated with a conventional flap or with the \"papilla preservation flap\". In addition, half of the defects received granular hydroxyapatite. In terms of pocket depth and probing attachment-level no significant differences were seen between the 4 groups after 3 and 6 months. Regarding the development of gingival recession, however, the papilla preservation technique has significant advantages and showed better aesthetic results.</p>","PeriodicalId":11244,"journal":{"name":"Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift","volume":"46 8","pages":"539-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Papilla-preserving flap procedure in periodontal implantation of alloplastic materials. Comparative study].\",\"authors\":\"J W Kleinfelder, D E Lange\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>40 periodontal defects with probing depths of 5 mm in 10 patients were treated with a conventional flap or with the \\\"papilla preservation flap\\\". In addition, half of the defects received granular hydroxyapatite. In terms of pocket depth and probing attachment-level no significant differences were seen between the 4 groups after 3 and 6 months. Regarding the development of gingival recession, however, the papilla preservation technique has significant advantages and showed better aesthetic results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift\",\"volume\":\"46 8\",\"pages\":\"539-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Papilla-preserving flap procedure in periodontal implantation of alloplastic materials. Comparative study].
40 periodontal defects with probing depths of 5 mm in 10 patients were treated with a conventional flap or with the "papilla preservation flap". In addition, half of the defects received granular hydroxyapatite. In terms of pocket depth and probing attachment-level no significant differences were seen between the 4 groups after 3 and 6 months. Regarding the development of gingival recession, however, the papilla preservation technique has significant advantages and showed better aesthetic results.