四种职业的信息安全文化比较研究

Sriraman Ramachandran, Srinivasan V. Rao, T. Goles
{"title":"四种职业的信息安全文化比较研究","authors":"Sriraman Ramachandran, Srinivasan V. Rao, T. Goles","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2008.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differences in cultures across professions have been reported in the professional culture literature. An understanding of such differences is important to understand the effects of culture. We extend this argument to the area of information security. We argue that it is necessary to examine the information security cultures of various professions to identify differences that may exist, so that they may be taken into account in formulating initiatives to enhance information security. In this article, we provide a comparative description of the security cultures of four professions - information systems, accounting, marketing and human resources - based on semi- structured interviews of respondents from each of the professions. Our results confirm the existence of differences in security cultures across professions. In particular, they indicate that there are differences in beliefs about what constitutes information security, who is responsible for it, and the likelihood of their compliance with security under performance pressure.","PeriodicalId":328874,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Security Cultures of Four Professions: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Sriraman Ramachandran, Srinivasan V. Rao, T. Goles\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.2008.201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Differences in cultures across professions have been reported in the professional culture literature. An understanding of such differences is important to understand the effects of culture. We extend this argument to the area of information security. We argue that it is necessary to examine the information security cultures of various professions to identify differences that may exist, so that they may be taken into account in formulating initiatives to enhance information security. In this article, we provide a comparative description of the security cultures of four professions - information systems, accounting, marketing and human resources - based on semi- structured interviews of respondents from each of the professions. Our results confirm the existence of differences in security cultures across professions. In particular, they indicate that there are differences in beliefs about what constitutes information security, who is responsible for it, and the likelihood of their compliance with security under performance pressure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

职业文化文献中已经报道了不同职业之间的文化差异。理解这些差异对于理解文化的影响是很重要的。我们将这一论点扩展到信息安全领域。我们认为有必要研究不同行业的资讯保安文化,找出可能存在的差异,以便在制定加强资讯保安的措施时考虑到这些差异。在这篇文章中,我们提供了四个专业的安全文化的比较描述-信息系统,会计,市场营销和人力资源-基于半结构化访谈的受访者从每个专业。我们的研究结果证实了不同职业的安全文化存在差异。特别是,他们指出,对于什么构成信息安全,谁负责信息安全,以及在业绩压力下遵守安全的可能性,存在不同的信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Information Security Cultures of Four Professions: A Comparative Study
Differences in cultures across professions have been reported in the professional culture literature. An understanding of such differences is important to understand the effects of culture. We extend this argument to the area of information security. We argue that it is necessary to examine the information security cultures of various professions to identify differences that may exist, so that they may be taken into account in formulating initiatives to enhance information security. In this article, we provide a comparative description of the security cultures of four professions - information systems, accounting, marketing and human resources - based on semi- structured interviews of respondents from each of the professions. Our results confirm the existence of differences in security cultures across professions. In particular, they indicate that there are differences in beliefs about what constitutes information security, who is responsible for it, and the likelihood of their compliance with security under performance pressure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction to collaboration issues in cross-organizational and cross-border IS/IT minitrack Resonance Marketing in the Age of the Truly Informed Consumer: Changes in Corporate Strategy Resulting from Changes in Customer Behavior Modes of Governance in Business Process Outsourcing: Executive versus Market's Perspective Social Exchange Online: Public Conversations in the Blogosphere InterDataNet: Interoperability Framework to Support Collaborative Creation and Management of Official Documents in e-Government Processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1