接待的困境:根据国际法重新审视印度尼西亚处理难民的政策

Ganesh Cintika Putri
{"title":"接待的困境:根据国际法重新审视印度尼西亚处理难民的政策","authors":"Ganesh Cintika Putri","doi":"10.30641/ham.2022.13.113-130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016 is the first regulation that provides a normative framework to manage refugees and asylum seekers in Indonesia. However, many scholars believe that this regulation is simply an institutionalization of several existing informal practices, and it does not introduce any substantive changes to ensure refugee protection. This paper analyzes the content of the Presidential Regulation, including its background, structure, wording, and its aims. In addition, this study identifies the limits of the regulation in fulfilling, protecting, and respecting human rights based on the international human rights instruments. This article contends that the Presidential Regulation portrays what I call dilemma of hospitality. It reflects on the one hand, the regulation welcomes the refugees by providing mandates to the authorities to rescue those stranded at sea and to provide accommodation during their stay. On the other hand, the regulation implies a kind of distrust to the refugees—treating them as a threat, limiting their movement, and forbidding them from work. The dilemma by and large affects the effective fulfillment of the rights of the refugees. This study offers some policy recommendations.","PeriodicalId":342655,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal HAM","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Dilemma of Hospitality: Revisiting Indonesia’s Policy on Handling Refugees Under International Law\",\"authors\":\"Ganesh Cintika Putri\",\"doi\":\"10.30641/ham.2022.13.113-130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016 is the first regulation that provides a normative framework to manage refugees and asylum seekers in Indonesia. However, many scholars believe that this regulation is simply an institutionalization of several existing informal practices, and it does not introduce any substantive changes to ensure refugee protection. This paper analyzes the content of the Presidential Regulation, including its background, structure, wording, and its aims. In addition, this study identifies the limits of the regulation in fulfilling, protecting, and respecting human rights based on the international human rights instruments. This article contends that the Presidential Regulation portrays what I call dilemma of hospitality. It reflects on the one hand, the regulation welcomes the refugees by providing mandates to the authorities to rescue those stranded at sea and to provide accommodation during their stay. On the other hand, the regulation implies a kind of distrust to the refugees—treating them as a threat, limiting their movement, and forbidding them from work. The dilemma by and large affects the effective fulfillment of the rights of the refugees. This study offers some policy recommendations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal HAM\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal HAM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.13.113-130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal HAM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.13.113-130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2016年第125号总统条例是第一个为管理印度尼西亚的难民和寻求庇护者提供规范性框架的条例。然而,许多学者认为,这一规定只是将现有的几种非正式做法制度化,并没有引入任何实质性的变化,以确保难民得到保护。本文分析了《总统条例》的内容,包括其产生的背景、结构、措辞和目的。此外,本研究还指出了以国际人权文书为基础的监管在实现、保护和尊重人权方面的局限性。这篇文章认为,总统条例描绘了我所说的待客困境。一方面,该条例通过授权当局拯救那些滞留在海上的人并在他们逗留期间提供住宿来欢迎难民。另一方面,这一规定意味着对难民的一种不信任——将他们视为威胁,限制他们的行动,禁止他们工作。这种困境在很大程度上影响了难民权利的有效实现。本研究提出了一些政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Dilemma of Hospitality: Revisiting Indonesia’s Policy on Handling Refugees Under International Law
Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016 is the first regulation that provides a normative framework to manage refugees and asylum seekers in Indonesia. However, many scholars believe that this regulation is simply an institutionalization of several existing informal practices, and it does not introduce any substantive changes to ensure refugee protection. This paper analyzes the content of the Presidential Regulation, including its background, structure, wording, and its aims. In addition, this study identifies the limits of the regulation in fulfilling, protecting, and respecting human rights based on the international human rights instruments. This article contends that the Presidential Regulation portrays what I call dilemma of hospitality. It reflects on the one hand, the regulation welcomes the refugees by providing mandates to the authorities to rescue those stranded at sea and to provide accommodation during their stay. On the other hand, the regulation implies a kind of distrust to the refugees—treating them as a threat, limiting their movement, and forbidding them from work. The dilemma by and large affects the effective fulfillment of the rights of the refugees. This study offers some policy recommendations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reduksi Hak Partisipasi publik Pada Aturan Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan untuk Perizinan Berusaha di Indonesia: Perspektif Green Constitution Konstitusionalitas Hak Kesehatan Jiwa Warga Negara: Studi Kebijakan Penanggulangan Bunuh Diri di Kabupaten Gunungkidul Transwomen in Pandemic: Rights, Access and Exclusion The Social Construction of Transgender in Jember Regency After the Jember Fashion Carnival Event: A Human Rights Perspective Isomorfisme Institusional LPSK dalam Penegakan Hak Rehabilitasi Psikososial Korban Tindak Pidana di Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1