{"title":"分析金钱的高速公路:以2014年为例。危机","authors":"Doc. Dr. Aleksandar Arsov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2499191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current crisis has triggered significant debate concerning economic theory and policy. Largely absent from this debate is an informed discussion of the methods used by economists in analysing the economy and formulating their proposals. But method matters. This study challenges the notion that there is an “adversary system” within the context of debt, crisis and capital increase. The findings suggest that no such adversary system exists for most defendants in consumer debt cases. Instead, these cases exist. We argue theory and practice on 2014. United Internet capital increase case.","PeriodicalId":376458,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Debt (Topic)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the Highways of Money: The Case of 2014. Crisis\",\"authors\":\"Doc. Dr. Aleksandar Arsov\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2499191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current crisis has triggered significant debate concerning economic theory and policy. Largely absent from this debate is an informed discussion of the methods used by economists in analysing the economy and formulating their proposals. But method matters. This study challenges the notion that there is an “adversary system” within the context of debt, crisis and capital increase. The findings suggest that no such adversary system exists for most defendants in consumer debt cases. Instead, these cases exist. We argue theory and practice on 2014. United Internet capital increase case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Debt (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Debt (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2499191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Debt (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2499191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analyzing the Highways of Money: The Case of 2014. Crisis
The current crisis has triggered significant debate concerning economic theory and policy. Largely absent from this debate is an informed discussion of the methods used by economists in analysing the economy and formulating their proposals. But method matters. This study challenges the notion that there is an “adversary system” within the context of debt, crisis and capital increase. The findings suggest that no such adversary system exists for most defendants in consumer debt cases. Instead, these cases exist. We argue theory and practice on 2014. United Internet capital increase case.