{"title":"利用项目融资缓解信息不对称问题","authors":"A. Miglo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.686462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brennan and Kraus (1987) show that an efficient separating equilibrium in a financing game where the firms have private information about their cash flows does not exist if the cash flows are ordered by the first-order dominance condition. In the present note we relax their assumption about cash flow indivisibility. We show that when the cash flow is divided in parts (projects) and the firms are allowed to issue securities with projects’ cash flows contingent on payoffs, a separating equilibrium may exist even if the firms total cash flows are ordered by the first-order dominance condition.","PeriodicalId":437258,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Project Financing for Mitigating Asymmetric Information Problems\",\"authors\":\"A. Miglo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.686462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Brennan and Kraus (1987) show that an efficient separating equilibrium in a financing game where the firms have private information about their cash flows does not exist if the cash flows are ordered by the first-order dominance condition. In the present note we relax their assumption about cash flow indivisibility. We show that when the cash flow is divided in parts (projects) and the firms are allowed to issue securities with projects’ cash flows contingent on payoffs, a separating equilibrium may exist even if the firms total cash flows are ordered by the first-order dominance condition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.686462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.686462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using Project Financing for Mitigating Asymmetric Information Problems
Brennan and Kraus (1987) show that an efficient separating equilibrium in a financing game where the firms have private information about their cash flows does not exist if the cash flows are ordered by the first-order dominance condition. In the present note we relax their assumption about cash flow indivisibility. We show that when the cash flow is divided in parts (projects) and the firms are allowed to issue securities with projects’ cash flows contingent on payoffs, a separating equilibrium may exist even if the firms total cash flows are ordered by the first-order dominance condition.