{"title":"太阳场中行星运动透镜效应测量的研究进展","authors":"L. Iorio","doi":"10.3814/2008/105235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By processing more than 400 000 planetary observations of various types \nwith the dynamical models of the EPM2006 ephemerides, E.V. Pitjeva recently \nestimated a correction to the canonical Newtonian-Einsteinian Venus' perihelion \nprecession of − 0.0004 ± 0.0001 arcseconds per century. The prediction of general \nrelativity for the Lense-Thirring precession of the perihelion of Venus is − 0.0003 arcseconds per century. It turns out that neither other mismodelled/unmodelled \nstandard Newtonian/Einsteinian effects nor exotic ones, postulated to, for example, \nexplain the Pioneer anomaly, may have caused the estimated extra-precession \nof the Venus orbit which, thus, can be reasonably attributed to the \ngravitomagnetic field of the Sun, not modelled in the routines of the EPM2006 \nephemerides. However, it must be noted that the quoted error is the formal, \nstatistical one; the realistic uncertainty might be larger. Future improvements of \nthe inner planets' ephemerides, with the inclusion of the Messenger and Venus-Express tracking data, should further improve the accuracy and the consistency \nof such a test of general relativity which would also benefit from the independent \nestimation of the extra-precessions of the perihelia (and the nodes) by other teams \nof astronomers.","PeriodicalId":169134,"journal":{"name":"Scholarly Research Exchange","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in the Measurement of the Lense-Thirring Effect with Planetary Motions in the Field of the Sun\",\"authors\":\"L. Iorio\",\"doi\":\"10.3814/2008/105235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By processing more than 400 000 planetary observations of various types \\nwith the dynamical models of the EPM2006 ephemerides, E.V. Pitjeva recently \\nestimated a correction to the canonical Newtonian-Einsteinian Venus' perihelion \\nprecession of − 0.0004 ± 0.0001 arcseconds per century. The prediction of general \\nrelativity for the Lense-Thirring precession of the perihelion of Venus is − 0.0003 arcseconds per century. It turns out that neither other mismodelled/unmodelled \\nstandard Newtonian/Einsteinian effects nor exotic ones, postulated to, for example, \\nexplain the Pioneer anomaly, may have caused the estimated extra-precession \\nof the Venus orbit which, thus, can be reasonably attributed to the \\ngravitomagnetic field of the Sun, not modelled in the routines of the EPM2006 \\nephemerides. However, it must be noted that the quoted error is the formal, \\nstatistical one; the realistic uncertainty might be larger. Future improvements of \\nthe inner planets' ephemerides, with the inclusion of the Messenger and Venus-Express tracking data, should further improve the accuracy and the consistency \\nof such a test of general relativity which would also benefit from the independent \\nestimation of the extra-precessions of the perihelia (and the nodes) by other teams \\nof astronomers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scholarly Research Exchange\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scholarly Research Exchange\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3814/2008/105235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholarly Research Exchange","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3814/2008/105235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advances in the Measurement of the Lense-Thirring Effect with Planetary Motions in the Field of the Sun
By processing more than 400 000 planetary observations of various types
with the dynamical models of the EPM2006 ephemerides, E.V. Pitjeva recently
estimated a correction to the canonical Newtonian-Einsteinian Venus' perihelion
precession of − 0.0004 ± 0.0001 arcseconds per century. The prediction of general
relativity for the Lense-Thirring precession of the perihelion of Venus is − 0.0003 arcseconds per century. It turns out that neither other mismodelled/unmodelled
standard Newtonian/Einsteinian effects nor exotic ones, postulated to, for example,
explain the Pioneer anomaly, may have caused the estimated extra-precession
of the Venus orbit which, thus, can be reasonably attributed to the
gravitomagnetic field of the Sun, not modelled in the routines of the EPM2006
ephemerides. However, it must be noted that the quoted error is the formal,
statistical one; the realistic uncertainty might be larger. Future improvements of
the inner planets' ephemerides, with the inclusion of the Messenger and Venus-Express tracking data, should further improve the accuracy and the consistency
of such a test of general relativity which would also benefit from the independent
estimation of the extra-precessions of the perihelia (and the nodes) by other teams
of astronomers.