无缺陷管道爆裂强度的机器学习模型

Xian-Kui Zhu, W. R. Johnson, R. Sindelar, B. Wiersma
{"title":"无缺陷管道爆裂强度的机器学习模型","authors":"Xian-Kui Zhu, W. R. Johnson, R. Sindelar, B. Wiersma","doi":"10.1115/pvp2022-84908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Burst strength of line pipes is essential to pipeline design and integrity management. The simple Barlow equation with the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) was often used to estimate burst strength of line pipes. To consider the plastic flow effect of ductile steels, Zhu and Leis (2006, IJPVP) developed an average shear stress yield criterion and obtained the Zhu-Leis solution of burst strength for defect-free pipelines in term of UTS and strain hardening exponent, n, of materials. The Zhu-Leis solution was validated by more than 100 burst tests for various pipeline steels.\n The Zhu-Leis solution, when normalized by the Barlow strength, is a function of strain hardening rate, n, only, while the experimentally measured burst strength, when normalized by the Barlow strength, is a strong function of n and a weak function of UTS and pipe diameter to thickness ratio D/t. Due to difficulty of three-parameter regressions, this paper adopts the machine learning technology to develop alternative models of burst strength based on a large database of full-scale burst tests. In comparing to the regression, the machine learning method works well for both single and multiple parameters by introducing an artificial neural network (ANN), activation functions and learning algorithm for the network to learn and make predictions.\n Three ANN models were developed for predicting the burst strength of defect-free pipelines. Model 1 has one input variable and one hidden layer with three neurons; Model 2 has three input variables and one hidden layer with five neurons; and Model 3 has three input variables and two hidden layers with three neurons for the first hidden layer and two neurons for the second hidden layer. Those ANN models were then validated by the full-scale test data and evaluated through comparison with the Zhu-Leis solution and the linear regression result. On this basis, the best ANN model is recommended.","PeriodicalId":434862,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4B: Materials and Fabrication","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Models of Burst Strength for Defect-Free Pipelines\",\"authors\":\"Xian-Kui Zhu, W. R. Johnson, R. Sindelar, B. Wiersma\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/pvp2022-84908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Burst strength of line pipes is essential to pipeline design and integrity management. The simple Barlow equation with the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) was often used to estimate burst strength of line pipes. To consider the plastic flow effect of ductile steels, Zhu and Leis (2006, IJPVP) developed an average shear stress yield criterion and obtained the Zhu-Leis solution of burst strength for defect-free pipelines in term of UTS and strain hardening exponent, n, of materials. The Zhu-Leis solution was validated by more than 100 burst tests for various pipeline steels.\\n The Zhu-Leis solution, when normalized by the Barlow strength, is a function of strain hardening rate, n, only, while the experimentally measured burst strength, when normalized by the Barlow strength, is a strong function of n and a weak function of UTS and pipe diameter to thickness ratio D/t. Due to difficulty of three-parameter regressions, this paper adopts the machine learning technology to develop alternative models of burst strength based on a large database of full-scale burst tests. In comparing to the regression, the machine learning method works well for both single and multiple parameters by introducing an artificial neural network (ANN), activation functions and learning algorithm for the network to learn and make predictions.\\n Three ANN models were developed for predicting the burst strength of defect-free pipelines. Model 1 has one input variable and one hidden layer with three neurons; Model 2 has three input variables and one hidden layer with five neurons; and Model 3 has three input variables and two hidden layers with three neurons for the first hidden layer and two neurons for the second hidden layer. Those ANN models were then validated by the full-scale test data and evaluated through comparison with the Zhu-Leis solution and the linear regression result. On this basis, the best ANN model is recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 4B: Materials and Fabrication\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 4B: Materials and Fabrication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-84908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4B: Materials and Fabrication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-84908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

管道爆裂强度是管道设计和完整性管理的重要内容。带极限抗拉强度(UTS)的简单巴洛方程常用于估算管线的破裂强度。为了考虑延性钢的塑性流动效应,Zhu和Leis (2006, IJPVP)建立了平均剪切应力屈服准则,得到了以材料的UTS和应变硬化指数n为变量的无缺陷管道破裂强度的Zhu-Leis解。通过对各种管线钢进行100多次爆破试验,验证了Zhu-Leis解决方案的有效性。当用Barlow强度归一化时,Zhu-Leis溶液是应变硬化率n的函数,而实验测量的破裂强度,当用Barlow强度归一化时,是n的强函数,UTS和管径厚比D/t的弱函数。由于三参数回归的困难,本文采用机器学习技术,在大型全尺寸爆破试验数据库的基础上,建立了爆破强度的替代模型。与回归相比,机器学习方法通过引入人工神经网络(ANN)、激活函数和学习算法,使网络进行学习和预测,可以很好地处理单参数和多参数。建立了三种人工神经网络模型,用于预测无缺陷管道的破裂强度。模型1有一个输入变量和一个包含三个神经元的隐藏层;模型2有3个输入变量和1个包含5个神经元的隐藏层;模型3有三个输入变量和两个隐藏层,第一隐藏层有三个神经元,第二隐藏层有两个神经元。通过全尺寸试验数据对模型进行验证,并与朱磊解和线性回归结果进行对比评价。在此基础上,推荐最佳的人工神经网络模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine Learning Models of Burst Strength for Defect-Free Pipelines
Burst strength of line pipes is essential to pipeline design and integrity management. The simple Barlow equation with the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) was often used to estimate burst strength of line pipes. To consider the plastic flow effect of ductile steels, Zhu and Leis (2006, IJPVP) developed an average shear stress yield criterion and obtained the Zhu-Leis solution of burst strength for defect-free pipelines in term of UTS and strain hardening exponent, n, of materials. The Zhu-Leis solution was validated by more than 100 burst tests for various pipeline steels. The Zhu-Leis solution, when normalized by the Barlow strength, is a function of strain hardening rate, n, only, while the experimentally measured burst strength, when normalized by the Barlow strength, is a strong function of n and a weak function of UTS and pipe diameter to thickness ratio D/t. Due to difficulty of three-parameter regressions, this paper adopts the machine learning technology to develop alternative models of burst strength based on a large database of full-scale burst tests. In comparing to the regression, the machine learning method works well for both single and multiple parameters by introducing an artificial neural network (ANN), activation functions and learning algorithm for the network to learn and make predictions. Three ANN models were developed for predicting the burst strength of defect-free pipelines. Model 1 has one input variable and one hidden layer with three neurons; Model 2 has three input variables and one hidden layer with five neurons; and Model 3 has three input variables and two hidden layers with three neurons for the first hidden layer and two neurons for the second hidden layer. Those ANN models were then validated by the full-scale test data and evaluated through comparison with the Zhu-Leis solution and the linear regression result. On this basis, the best ANN model is recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling Electric-Potential for a Crack Subjected to Corrosion Under Static and Cyclic Loading Overview of Suitable Methodologies for Threshold Stress Determination by Small Punch in Aggressive Environments DetaClad™ Characterization for High-Temperature and High-Pressure Hydrogen Service Evaluation of Validity Criteria for Subsize Compact Tension Specimens Using a Bending Modified J-A2 Solution Flanges Impact Testing Exemption Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1