跨尺度的人权实践:土著人民在REDD+治理中的影响和认可

Linda Wallbott, E. Recio
{"title":"跨尺度的人权实践:土著人民在REDD+治理中的影响和认可","authors":"Linda Wallbott, E. Recio","doi":"10.1080/23802014.2018.1599691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIndigenous peoples belong to those societal groups most heavily affected by the impacts of climate change and by governance arrangements on forests. In more recent years they have strived to bring their concerns to the fore in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This paper investigates how indigenous peoples have framed their participation in REDD+, an initiative to protect forests to combat climate change. Indigenous peoples reframed their affectedness that results from their proximity to, and dependence on, forests, into an asset by emphasising their specific knowledge and expertise in managing natural forests. This reframing can be seen as an example of the spread of the ‘affectedness paradigm’ in global (climate) politics that manifests itself across levels. At the UNFCCC, indigenous peoples have managed to expand the recognition of their rights through REDD+ decisions. REDD+ financing initiatives outside the UNFCCC have adopted detailed rules to expand indigeno...","PeriodicalId":276914,"journal":{"name":"Affectedness and Participation in International Institutions","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practicing human rights across scale: indigenous peoples’ affectedness and recognition in REDD+ governance\",\"authors\":\"Linda Wallbott, E. Recio\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23802014.2018.1599691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTIndigenous peoples belong to those societal groups most heavily affected by the impacts of climate change and by governance arrangements on forests. In more recent years they have strived to bring their concerns to the fore in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This paper investigates how indigenous peoples have framed their participation in REDD+, an initiative to protect forests to combat climate change. Indigenous peoples reframed their affectedness that results from their proximity to, and dependence on, forests, into an asset by emphasising their specific knowledge and expertise in managing natural forests. This reframing can be seen as an example of the spread of the ‘affectedness paradigm’ in global (climate) politics that manifests itself across levels. At the UNFCCC, indigenous peoples have managed to expand the recognition of their rights through REDD+ decisions. REDD+ financing initiatives outside the UNFCCC have adopted detailed rules to expand indigeno...\",\"PeriodicalId\":276914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Affectedness and Participation in International Institutions\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Affectedness and Participation in International Institutions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2018.1599691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affectedness and Participation in International Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2018.1599691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

土著人民属于受气候变化影响和森林治理安排影响最严重的社会群体。近年来,他们努力在《联合国气候变化框架公约》(UNFCCC)中突出自己的关切。这篇论文调查了土著人民是如何安排他们参与REDD+的,REDD+是一个保护森林以应对气候变化的倡议。土著人民通过强调他们在管理天然林方面的具体知识和专门知识,将他们因靠近森林和依赖森林而产生的影响重新转变为一种资产。这种重构可以看作是“影响范式”在全球(气候)政治中传播的一个例子,它在各个层面上都表现出来。在《联合国气候变化框架公约》中,土著人民通过REDD+决定扩大了对其权利的承认。《联合国气候变化框架公约》之外的REDD+融资倡议已经通过了详细的规则,以扩大土著…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Practicing human rights across scale: indigenous peoples’ affectedness and recognition in REDD+ governance
ABSTRACTIndigenous peoples belong to those societal groups most heavily affected by the impacts of climate change and by governance arrangements on forests. In more recent years they have strived to bring their concerns to the fore in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This paper investigates how indigenous peoples have framed their participation in REDD+, an initiative to protect forests to combat climate change. Indigenous peoples reframed their affectedness that results from their proximity to, and dependence on, forests, into an asset by emphasising their specific knowledge and expertise in managing natural forests. This reframing can be seen as an example of the spread of the ‘affectedness paradigm’ in global (climate) politics that manifests itself across levels. At the UNFCCC, indigenous peoples have managed to expand the recognition of their rights through REDD+ decisions. REDD+ financing initiatives outside the UNFCCC have adopted detailed rules to expand indigeno...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Voices unheard – affected communities and the climate negotiations on loss and damage Tied affectedness? Grassroots resistance and the World Bank BRICS civil society initiatives: towards the inclusion of affected communities in collective development? Affectedness alliances: affected people at the centre of transnational advocacy Between threat and infantilisation: how frames impede the meaningful participation of the disaster affected in Haiti
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1