Suman Roy, A. Sajeev, A. Gopichand, A. Bhattacharya
{"title":"基于子过程层次的工业业务过程诊断实证分析","authors":"Suman Roy, A. Sajeev, A. Gopichand, A. Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1109/SCC.2016.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business process models expressed in languages such as BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation) play a critical role in implementing the workflows in modern organizations. However, control flow errors such as deadlock and lack of synchronization as well as syntactic errors arising out of poor modeling practices often occur in industrial process models. In this paper, we provide an empirical diagnostic analysis of such errors for real-life industrial process models. The investigation involved models from different application domains. It turns out that error frequency has non-linear relation with error depth (the maximum depth at which an error occurred) across models from all domains. Error occurrence has statistically significant correlations (p <; 0.0001) with the size of sub-processes as well as with the swim-lane interactions, however only the former correlation is strong (Spearman's ρ = 0.579). We also develop a logistic regression model to estimate error probability in terms of the following metrics: sub-process size, coefficient of connectivity, sequentiality and structuredness; the predictive model fits well with the data (χ2(4, N = 1261) = 720.68, p <; 0.001).","PeriodicalId":115693,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Analysis of Diagnosis of Industrial Business Processes at Sub-process Levels\",\"authors\":\"Suman Roy, A. Sajeev, A. Gopichand, A. Bhattacharya\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SCC.2016.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Business process models expressed in languages such as BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation) play a critical role in implementing the workflows in modern organizations. However, control flow errors such as deadlock and lack of synchronization as well as syntactic errors arising out of poor modeling practices often occur in industrial process models. In this paper, we provide an empirical diagnostic analysis of such errors for real-life industrial process models. The investigation involved models from different application domains. It turns out that error frequency has non-linear relation with error depth (the maximum depth at which an error occurred) across models from all domains. Error occurrence has statistically significant correlations (p <; 0.0001) with the size of sub-processes as well as with the swim-lane interactions, however only the former correlation is strong (Spearman's ρ = 0.579). We also develop a logistic regression model to estimate error probability in terms of the following metrics: sub-process size, coefficient of connectivity, sequentiality and structuredness; the predictive model fits well with the data (χ2(4, N = 1261) = 720.68, p <; 0.001).\",\"PeriodicalId\":115693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCC.2016.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCC.2016.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
用BPMN(业务流程模型和符号)等语言表示的业务流程模型在实现现代组织中的工作流方面发挥着关键作用。然而,控制流错误(如死锁和缺乏同步)以及由不良建模实践引起的语法错误经常发生在工业流程模型中。在本文中,我们为现实工业过程模型提供了这种误差的实证诊断分析。调查涉及来自不同应用领域的模型。结果表明,在所有领域的模型中,错误频率与错误深度(错误发生的最大深度)呈非线性关系。错误发生率与统计学显著相关(p <;0.0001)与子过程的大小以及泳道相互作用有关,但只有前者的相关性很强(斯皮尔曼ρ = 0.579)。我们还开发了一个逻辑回归模型,根据以下指标来估计错误概率:子过程大小、连通性系数、顺序性和结构性;预测模型与数据拟合良好(χ2(4, N = 1261) = 720.68, p <;0.001)。
An Empirical Analysis of Diagnosis of Industrial Business Processes at Sub-process Levels
Business process models expressed in languages such as BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation) play a critical role in implementing the workflows in modern organizations. However, control flow errors such as deadlock and lack of synchronization as well as syntactic errors arising out of poor modeling practices often occur in industrial process models. In this paper, we provide an empirical diagnostic analysis of such errors for real-life industrial process models. The investigation involved models from different application domains. It turns out that error frequency has non-linear relation with error depth (the maximum depth at which an error occurred) across models from all domains. Error occurrence has statistically significant correlations (p <; 0.0001) with the size of sub-processes as well as with the swim-lane interactions, however only the former correlation is strong (Spearman's ρ = 0.579). We also develop a logistic regression model to estimate error probability in terms of the following metrics: sub-process size, coefficient of connectivity, sequentiality and structuredness; the predictive model fits well with the data (χ2(4, N = 1261) = 720.68, p <; 0.001).