中央交易对手的竞争与控制:当风险降低利润增加时

Hector Perez Saiz, Jean-Sébastien Fontaine, Joshua Slive
{"title":"中央交易对手的竞争与控制:当风险降低利润增加时","authors":"Hector Perez Saiz, Jean-Sébastien Fontaine, Joshua Slive","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2022439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central counterparties (CCPs) are becoming central to over-the-counter (OTC) markets. A CCP limits counterparty risk but raises entry barriers. We analyze the trade-off between dealers’ equilibrium default risk and competition in an OTC market with imperfect competition and endogenous default probability. We find that (i) CCP members favor entry restrictions and binding risk controls as a device to commit to less competition, (ii) restricting entry maximizes welfare when dealers’ transfer risk efficiently relative to their market power, and (iii) free entry reaches the first-best welfare if the CCP can limit risk-taking.","PeriodicalId":369344,"journal":{"name":"American Finance Association Meetings (AFA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dealers' Competition and Control of a Central Counterparty: When Lower Risk Increases Profit\",\"authors\":\"Hector Perez Saiz, Jean-Sébastien Fontaine, Joshua Slive\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2022439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Central counterparties (CCPs) are becoming central to over-the-counter (OTC) markets. A CCP limits counterparty risk but raises entry barriers. We analyze the trade-off between dealers’ equilibrium default risk and competition in an OTC market with imperfect competition and endogenous default probability. We find that (i) CCP members favor entry restrictions and binding risk controls as a device to commit to less competition, (ii) restricting entry maximizes welfare when dealers’ transfer risk efficiently relative to their market power, and (iii) free entry reaches the first-best welfare if the CCP can limit risk-taking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Finance Association Meetings (AFA)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Finance Association Meetings (AFA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2022439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Finance Association Meetings (AFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2022439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

中央交易对手(ccp)正成为场外交易(OTC)市场的核心。CCP限制了交易对手风险,但提高了进入门槛。本文分析了不完全竞争和内生违约概率的场外交易市场中交易商均衡违约风险与竞争的权衡关系。我们发现:(i) CCP成员倾向于限制进入和约束风险控制作为减少竞争的一种手段;(ii)当经销商相对于其市场力量有效地转移风险时,限制进入使福利最大化;(iii)如果CCP能够限制风险承担,自由进入将达到最佳福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dealers' Competition and Control of a Central Counterparty: When Lower Risk Increases Profit
Central counterparties (CCPs) are becoming central to over-the-counter (OTC) markets. A CCP limits counterparty risk but raises entry barriers. We analyze the trade-off between dealers’ equilibrium default risk and competition in an OTC market with imperfect competition and endogenous default probability. We find that (i) CCP members favor entry restrictions and binding risk controls as a device to commit to less competition, (ii) restricting entry maximizes welfare when dealers’ transfer risk efficiently relative to their market power, and (iii) free entry reaches the first-best welfare if the CCP can limit risk-taking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Director Connections and Board Advising Investment Risk, CDS Insurance, and Firm Financing An Asset Pricing Approach to Testing General Term Structure Models High Leverage and Willingness to Pay: Evidence from the Residential Housing Market Illiquidity Premia in the Equity Options Market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1