《问答》中答案的词汇验证

Anne-Laure Ligozat, Brigitte Grau, Anne Vilnat, Isabelle Robba, Arnaud Grappy
{"title":"《问答》中答案的词汇验证","authors":"Anne-Laure Ligozat, Brigitte Grau, Anne Vilnat, Isabelle Robba, Arnaud Grappy","doi":"10.1109/WI.2007.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Question answering (QA) aims at retrieving precise information from a large collection of documents, typically the Web. Different techniques can be used to find relevant information, and to compare these techniques, it is important to evaluate question answering systems. The objective of an Answer Validation task is to estimate the correctness of an answer returned by a QA system for a question, according to the text snippet given to support it. In this article, we present a lexical strategy for deciding if the snippets justify the answers, based on our own question answering system. We discuss our results, and show the possible extensions of our strategy.","PeriodicalId":192501,"journal":{"name":"IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'07)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lexical validation of answers in Question Answering\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Laure Ligozat, Brigitte Grau, Anne Vilnat, Isabelle Robba, Arnaud Grappy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WI.2007.70\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Question answering (QA) aims at retrieving precise information from a large collection of documents, typically the Web. Different techniques can be used to find relevant information, and to compare these techniques, it is important to evaluate question answering systems. The objective of an Answer Validation task is to estimate the correctness of an answer returned by a QA system for a question, according to the text snippet given to support it. In this article, we present a lexical strategy for deciding if the snippets justify the answers, based on our own question answering system. We discuss our results, and show the possible extensions of our strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'07)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'07)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WI.2007.70\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WI.2007.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

问答(QA)旨在从大量文档(通常是Web)中检索精确的信息。可以使用不同的技术来查找相关信息,为了比较这些技术,评估问答系统是很重要的。答案验证任务的目标是根据给出的文本片段来估计QA系统对问题返回的答案的正确性。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于我们自己的问答系统来决定片段是否证明答案的词汇策略。我们讨论了我们的结果,并展示了我们战略的可能扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lexical validation of answers in Question Answering
Question answering (QA) aims at retrieving precise information from a large collection of documents, typically the Web. Different techniques can be used to find relevant information, and to compare these techniques, it is important to evaluate question answering systems. The objective of an Answer Validation task is to estimate the correctness of an answer returned by a QA system for a question, according to the text snippet given to support it. In this article, we present a lexical strategy for deciding if the snippets justify the answers, based on our own question answering system. We discuss our results, and show the possible extensions of our strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Conceptual Tagging: An Ontology Pruning Use Case Extending Description Logic for Reasoning about Ontology Evolution You Can't Always Get What You Want: Achieving Differentiated Service Levels with Pricing Agents in a Storage Grid An unsupervised hierarchical approach to document categorization How Up-to-date should it be? the Value of Instant Profiling and Adaptation in Information Filtering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1