TCP Vegas和随机早期检测的仿真性能研究

A. Raghavendra, R. Kinicki
{"title":"TCP Vegas和随机早期检测的仿真性能研究","authors":"A. Raghavendra, R. Kinicki","doi":"10.1109/PCCC.1999.749435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents results from a series of simulation experiments designed to study network performance when TCP Vegas and the Random Early Detection (RED) algorithm are used together. Using the x-Sim network simulator, simulation tests were conducted with a variety of traffic scenarios using both TCP Reno and TCP Vegas in combination with First-Come-First-Served (FCFS) and RED routers. Analysis of the performance results for three configurations shows that TCP Vegas host-dominated configurations perform better than TCP Reno host-dominated configurations and that the RED algorithm provides better fairness than FCFS. The RED improvement is higher when the configuration includes a mix of Reno and Vegas hosts. Furthermore, when the buffer allocation in a FCFS router is inadequate, the router performance becomes unstable under heavy traffic. When fragile and robust TCP sources send traffic into a congested router, the TCP Vegas/RED router combination provides the highest throughput and best fairness for the fragile hosts.","PeriodicalId":211210,"journal":{"name":"1999 IEEE International Performance, Computing and Communications Conference (Cat. No.99CH36305)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A simulation performance study of TCP Vegas and Random Early Detection\",\"authors\":\"A. Raghavendra, R. Kinicki\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PCCC.1999.749435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents results from a series of simulation experiments designed to study network performance when TCP Vegas and the Random Early Detection (RED) algorithm are used together. Using the x-Sim network simulator, simulation tests were conducted with a variety of traffic scenarios using both TCP Reno and TCP Vegas in combination with First-Come-First-Served (FCFS) and RED routers. Analysis of the performance results for three configurations shows that TCP Vegas host-dominated configurations perform better than TCP Reno host-dominated configurations and that the RED algorithm provides better fairness than FCFS. The RED improvement is higher when the configuration includes a mix of Reno and Vegas hosts. Furthermore, when the buffer allocation in a FCFS router is inadequate, the router performance becomes unstable under heavy traffic. When fragile and robust TCP sources send traffic into a congested router, the TCP Vegas/RED router combination provides the highest throughput and best fairness for the fragile hosts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1999 IEEE International Performance, Computing and Communications Conference (Cat. No.99CH36305)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1999 IEEE International Performance, Computing and Communications Conference (Cat. No.99CH36305)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCCC.1999.749435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1999 IEEE International Performance, Computing and Communications Conference (Cat. No.99CH36305)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCCC.1999.749435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本文介绍了一系列仿真实验的结果,这些实验旨在研究TCP Vegas和随机早期检测(RED)算法一起使用时的网络性能。使用x-Sim网络模拟器,使用TCP Reno和TCP Vegas结合先到先得(FCFS)和RED路由器对各种流量场景进行了模拟测试。对三种配置的性能结果分析表明,TCP Vegas主机主导配置的性能优于TCP Reno主机主导配置,RED算法的公平性优于FCFS。当配置包括雷诺和拉斯维加斯主机的混合时,RED改进更高。此外,当FCFS路由器中的缓冲区分配不足时,在大流量下,路由器的性能会变得不稳定。当脆弱和健壮的TCP源向拥塞的路由器发送流量时,TCP Vegas/RED路由器组合为脆弱的主机提供最高的吞吐量和最佳的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A simulation performance study of TCP Vegas and Random Early Detection
This paper presents results from a series of simulation experiments designed to study network performance when TCP Vegas and the Random Early Detection (RED) algorithm are used together. Using the x-Sim network simulator, simulation tests were conducted with a variety of traffic scenarios using both TCP Reno and TCP Vegas in combination with First-Come-First-Served (FCFS) and RED routers. Analysis of the performance results for three configurations shows that TCP Vegas host-dominated configurations perform better than TCP Reno host-dominated configurations and that the RED algorithm provides better fairness than FCFS. The RED improvement is higher when the configuration includes a mix of Reno and Vegas hosts. Furthermore, when the buffer allocation in a FCFS router is inadequate, the router performance becomes unstable under heavy traffic. When fragile and robust TCP sources send traffic into a congested router, the TCP Vegas/RED router combination provides the highest throughput and best fairness for the fragile hosts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An optical layer protocol for lightpath management in WDM networks PDATS II: improved compression of address traces An adaptive distributed channel allocation strategy for mobile cellular networks Validation of Turandot, a fast processor model for microarchitecture exploration Sectored renaming for superscalar microprocessors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1