{"title":"黑格尔与政治经济学:对历史与语言学辩论的贡献","authors":"A. León, P. Moya","doi":"10.4067/s0718-50652019000100215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEn el presente articulo presentamos el debate que se ha suscitado entre diferentes autores hegelianos acerca de la importancia, trascendencia y alcance epistemologico del concepto de economia politica en Hegel. El debate acerca de las influencias economicas sobre la obra de Hegel oscila desde la posibilidad de influencias directas de lecturas de James Steuart y Adam Smith, hasta dialogos indirectos con ambos autores a traves de lecturas de Locke, Hume y Ferguson. Aqui esbozamos la interpretacion de exegetas como Georg Lukacs, Norbert Waszek, Jose Maria Ripalda, Erzsebet Rozsa o Tetsushi Harada, quienes, entre otros autores, dan vida a un debate de por si oscuro. La falta de escritos y la marginalidad de los textos de Hegel sobre el fenomeno de la economia politica hacen del analisis un objeto dificil de asir. Aqui nos proponemos reconstruir historiograficamente los aspectos teoricos centrales de Hegel, a traves obras, tendencias y traducciones, frente al fenomeno de la economia politica. El analisis emprendido nos llevara a reconocer una diferencia en el tratamiento del tema entre el joven Hegel y el maduro, pero que comprende transversalmente la economia politica no en la forma de elucubracion acerca de los principios y axiomas que la componen, sino en las implicancias eticas que ella comporta. Para corroborar aquello, someteremos a juicio las diferentes hipotesis sobre la constitucion economica en Hegel en su propia Filosofia del derecho, como tambien en sus respectivas lecciones. EnglishIn this article we present the debate that has arisen among different Hegelian authors about the importance, transcendence and epistemological scope of the concept of political economy in Hegel. The debate about the economic influences on Hegel’s work oscillates between the possibility of direct influences of readings of James Steuart and Adam Smith and indirect dialogues with both authors through readings of Locke’s, Hume’s and Ferguson’s concepts of economy. Here we outline the interpretation of exegetes such as Georg Lukacs, Norbert Waszek, Jose Maria Ripalda, Erzsebet Rozsa or Tetsushi Harada, who, among other authors, inject life to an already obscure debate. The lack of writings and the marginality of Hegel's texts on the phenomenon of political economy make the analysis an arduous task. Here we propose to reconstruct historiographically the central theoretical aspects of Hegel, through works, trends and translations, on the phenomenon of political economy. The analysis will lead us to recognize a difference in the treatment of the subject between the young and the old Hegel, but that transversally understands the political economy not in the form of elucubration about principles and axioms that compose it, but in the ethical implications that it entails. To corroborate that, we will put to judgment the different hypotheses about Hegel's economic position in his own Philosophy of law, as well as in their respective lessons.","PeriodicalId":111465,"journal":{"name":"Límite (Arica)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HEGEL Y LA ECONOMÍA POLÍTICA: CONTRIBUCIONES PARA UN DEBATE HISTÓRICO Y FILOLÓGICO\",\"authors\":\"A. León, P. Moya\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-50652019000100215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolEn el presente articulo presentamos el debate que se ha suscitado entre diferentes autores hegelianos acerca de la importancia, trascendencia y alcance epistemologico del concepto de economia politica en Hegel. El debate acerca de las influencias economicas sobre la obra de Hegel oscila desde la posibilidad de influencias directas de lecturas de James Steuart y Adam Smith, hasta dialogos indirectos con ambos autores a traves de lecturas de Locke, Hume y Ferguson. Aqui esbozamos la interpretacion de exegetas como Georg Lukacs, Norbert Waszek, Jose Maria Ripalda, Erzsebet Rozsa o Tetsushi Harada, quienes, entre otros autores, dan vida a un debate de por si oscuro. La falta de escritos y la marginalidad de los textos de Hegel sobre el fenomeno de la economia politica hacen del analisis un objeto dificil de asir. Aqui nos proponemos reconstruir historiograficamente los aspectos teoricos centrales de Hegel, a traves obras, tendencias y traducciones, frente al fenomeno de la economia politica. El analisis emprendido nos llevara a reconocer una diferencia en el tratamiento del tema entre el joven Hegel y el maduro, pero que comprende transversalmente la economia politica no en la forma de elucubracion acerca de los principios y axiomas que la componen, sino en las implicancias eticas que ella comporta. Para corroborar aquello, someteremos a juicio las diferentes hipotesis sobre la constitucion economica en Hegel en su propia Filosofia del derecho, como tambien en sus respectivas lecciones. EnglishIn this article we present the debate that has arisen among different Hegelian authors about the importance, transcendence and epistemological scope of the concept of political economy in Hegel. The debate about the economic influences on Hegel’s work oscillates between the possibility of direct influences of readings of James Steuart and Adam Smith and indirect dialogues with both authors through readings of Locke’s, Hume’s and Ferguson’s concepts of economy. Here we outline the interpretation of exegetes such as Georg Lukacs, Norbert Waszek, Jose Maria Ripalda, Erzsebet Rozsa or Tetsushi Harada, who, among other authors, inject life to an already obscure debate. The lack of writings and the marginality of Hegel's texts on the phenomenon of political economy make the analysis an arduous task. Here we propose to reconstruct historiographically the central theoretical aspects of Hegel, through works, trends and translations, on the phenomenon of political economy. The analysis will lead us to recognize a difference in the treatment of the subject between the young and the old Hegel, but that transversally understands the political economy not in the form of elucubration about principles and axioms that compose it, but in the ethical implications that it entails. To corroborate that, we will put to judgment the different hypotheses about Hegel's economic position in his own Philosophy of law, as well as in their respective lessons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Límite (Arica)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Límite (Arica)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50652019000100215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Límite (Arica)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50652019000100215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在这篇文章中,我们提出了不同黑格尔作者之间关于黑格尔政治经济学概念的重要性、超越性和认识论范围的争论。关于黑格尔作品的经济影响的争论,从詹姆斯·斯图尔特和亚当·斯密的直接影响的可能性,到洛克、休谟和弗格森的间接对话。在这里,我们概述了像Georg Lukacs, Norbert Waszek, Jose Maria Ripalda, Erzsebet Rozsa或Tetsushi Harada这样的诠释者的解释,他们和其他作者一起,赋予了一场黑暗的辩论生命。黑格尔关于政治经济学现象的著作的缺乏和边缘性,使分析成为一个难以把握的对象。在本文中,我们试图从历史的角度重建黑格尔的中心理论方面,通过作品、趋势和翻译,面对政治经济学的现象。分析采取带我们认识一个年轻的黑格尔在处理议程项目差异和成熟,但包括横向经济在没有办法elucubracion对政治原则和组成的的,而是影响eticas困扰着她。在这方面,我们将从黑格尔关于经济宪法的不同假设出发,在他自己的法律哲学中,以及在他各自的课程中。在这篇文章中,我们提出了不同黑格尔作者之间关于黑格尔政治经济学概念的重要性、超越性和认识论范围的争论。关于黑格尔著作中经济影响的争论,在阅读詹姆斯·斯图尔特和亚当·斯密的直接影响的可能性和通过阅读洛克、休谟和弗格森的经济学概念与两位作者的间接对话之间左右。在这里,我们总结了对格奥尔格·卢卡奇(Georg Lukacs)、诺伯特·瓦泽克(Norbert Waszek)、Jose Maria Ripalda、埃尔兹贝特·罗萨(Erzsebet Rozsa)或原田Tetsushi Harada等人的解释,他们和其他作者一起为已经不清楚的辩论带来了生命。缺乏of The end and The marginality of黑格尔’s texts on The phenomenon of political economy make The analysis an arduous task。在这里,我们建议通过著作、趋势和翻译,从历史上重建黑格尔关于政治经济学现象的中心理论方面。这一分析将使我们认识到年轻黑格尔和老黑格尔在对待主体方面的不同之处,但这种不同之处并不在于对构成政治经济学的原则和公理的阐释形式,而在于其所蕴涵的伦理意义。为了证实这一点,我们可以在黑格尔自己的法律哲学中,以及在他们各自的教训中,对黑格尔的经济立场作出不同的假设。
HEGEL Y LA ECONOMÍA POLÍTICA: CONTRIBUCIONES PARA UN DEBATE HISTÓRICO Y FILOLÓGICO
espanolEn el presente articulo presentamos el debate que se ha suscitado entre diferentes autores hegelianos acerca de la importancia, trascendencia y alcance epistemologico del concepto de economia politica en Hegel. El debate acerca de las influencias economicas sobre la obra de Hegel oscila desde la posibilidad de influencias directas de lecturas de James Steuart y Adam Smith, hasta dialogos indirectos con ambos autores a traves de lecturas de Locke, Hume y Ferguson. Aqui esbozamos la interpretacion de exegetas como Georg Lukacs, Norbert Waszek, Jose Maria Ripalda, Erzsebet Rozsa o Tetsushi Harada, quienes, entre otros autores, dan vida a un debate de por si oscuro. La falta de escritos y la marginalidad de los textos de Hegel sobre el fenomeno de la economia politica hacen del analisis un objeto dificil de asir. Aqui nos proponemos reconstruir historiograficamente los aspectos teoricos centrales de Hegel, a traves obras, tendencias y traducciones, frente al fenomeno de la economia politica. El analisis emprendido nos llevara a reconocer una diferencia en el tratamiento del tema entre el joven Hegel y el maduro, pero que comprende transversalmente la economia politica no en la forma de elucubracion acerca de los principios y axiomas que la componen, sino en las implicancias eticas que ella comporta. Para corroborar aquello, someteremos a juicio las diferentes hipotesis sobre la constitucion economica en Hegel en su propia Filosofia del derecho, como tambien en sus respectivas lecciones. EnglishIn this article we present the debate that has arisen among different Hegelian authors about the importance, transcendence and epistemological scope of the concept of political economy in Hegel. The debate about the economic influences on Hegel’s work oscillates between the possibility of direct influences of readings of James Steuart and Adam Smith and indirect dialogues with both authors through readings of Locke’s, Hume’s and Ferguson’s concepts of economy. Here we outline the interpretation of exegetes such as Georg Lukacs, Norbert Waszek, Jose Maria Ripalda, Erzsebet Rozsa or Tetsushi Harada, who, among other authors, inject life to an already obscure debate. The lack of writings and the marginality of Hegel's texts on the phenomenon of political economy make the analysis an arduous task. Here we propose to reconstruct historiographically the central theoretical aspects of Hegel, through works, trends and translations, on the phenomenon of political economy. The analysis will lead us to recognize a difference in the treatment of the subject between the young and the old Hegel, but that transversally understands the political economy not in the form of elucubration about principles and axioms that compose it, but in the ethical implications that it entails. To corroborate that, we will put to judgment the different hypotheses about Hegel's economic position in his own Philosophy of law, as well as in their respective lessons.