A. Hamid, Raymond Yovelanyine Suonyir, Salomey Frimpomaa, K. Agyeman-Duah, Kwapong Yaw Kissiedu, Evans Ewusie Cudjoe, S. Nanga, P. K. Kwadzokpui, R. Duneeh, A. T. Bawah, Kenneth Owusu Agyemang, Samuel Akoliga, Israel Tordzro Agudze, Rosemary Dormenyo Amenuvor, V. Orish, E. S. Kasu, E. Ofori, S. Owusu-Agyei, A. Wahab, Mawuko Hamid
{"title":"基于单生物标志物的疟疾快速诊断试剂盒在加纳军事医疗中心的临床应用:一项前瞻性试点研究","authors":"A. Hamid, Raymond Yovelanyine Suonyir, Salomey Frimpomaa, K. Agyeman-Duah, Kwapong Yaw Kissiedu, Evans Ewusie Cudjoe, S. Nanga, P. K. Kwadzokpui, R. Duneeh, A. T. Bawah, Kenneth Owusu Agyemang, Samuel Akoliga, Israel Tordzro Agudze, Rosemary Dormenyo Amenuvor, V. Orish, E. S. Kasu, E. Ofori, S. Owusu-Agyei, A. Wahab, Mawuko Hamid","doi":"10.33140/ijhpp.02.02.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The proliferation of non-falciparum species of plasmodium into a predominant falciparum population compromises the utility of monobiomarker-based Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test (mRDT). This study evaluated the clinical utility of a monobiomarker-based Carestart and Paracheck mRDTs, which were in routine use at a Military Medical Centre in Ghana at the time of the study. Methods: The study was designed to assess the validity of candidate mRDTs among population risk of exposure to nonfalciparum species of plasmodium in Ghana. Blood samples collected from a consecutive series of 207 febrile patients in the months of June and July 2020, were tested for malaria parasites, using the mRDTs and microscopy as the gold standard. Prevalence, validity, and reliability metrics were determined using Frequentist, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC), and Kappa statistics, respectively. Results: The prevalence was 23.2% and 12.3% using microscopy and candidate mRDT, respectively. Sensitivities and specificities were 53.2% and 98.1% (Carestart) 45.8% and 99.4% (Paracheck), respectively. Neither ROC analysis showed a significant disparity between mRDTs (Carestart: AUROC=0.75 vs Paracheck: AUROC=0.73), nor the reliability index showed disagreement between both mRDTs (Cronbach’s α = 0.92). However, there was significant disagreement between microscopy and mRDTs (Carestart: Kappa=0.58 vs Paracheck: Kappa=0.55). Conclusion: The use of a monobiomaker mRDTs in this study led to a significant variation between the ‘internal’ and ‘ecological’ validity metrics. Averagely, 84% of mRDT false negatives were confirmed by microscopy as non-falciparum species of plasmodium. The observed trends have and research policy implications. It is therefore, critical to accelerate the implementation of WHO’s recommendation to switch from mono to multiple biomarker (s) based mRDTs for detecting both falciparum and non-falciparum species. Extended research is needed to consolidate our understanding on the dynamics of malaria among our military personnel exposed to non-falciparum plasmodium.","PeriodicalId":337809,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Policy Planning","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Utility of Mono-Biomarker based Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits at a Military Medical Centre in Ghana: A Prospective Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Hamid, Raymond Yovelanyine Suonyir, Salomey Frimpomaa, K. Agyeman-Duah, Kwapong Yaw Kissiedu, Evans Ewusie Cudjoe, S. Nanga, P. K. Kwadzokpui, R. Duneeh, A. T. Bawah, Kenneth Owusu Agyemang, Samuel Akoliga, Israel Tordzro Agudze, Rosemary Dormenyo Amenuvor, V. Orish, E. S. Kasu, E. Ofori, S. Owusu-Agyei, A. Wahab, Mawuko Hamid\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/ijhpp.02.02.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The proliferation of non-falciparum species of plasmodium into a predominant falciparum population compromises the utility of monobiomarker-based Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test (mRDT). This study evaluated the clinical utility of a monobiomarker-based Carestart and Paracheck mRDTs, which were in routine use at a Military Medical Centre in Ghana at the time of the study. Methods: The study was designed to assess the validity of candidate mRDTs among population risk of exposure to nonfalciparum species of plasmodium in Ghana. Blood samples collected from a consecutive series of 207 febrile patients in the months of June and July 2020, were tested for malaria parasites, using the mRDTs and microscopy as the gold standard. Prevalence, validity, and reliability metrics were determined using Frequentist, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC), and Kappa statistics, respectively. Results: The prevalence was 23.2% and 12.3% using microscopy and candidate mRDT, respectively. Sensitivities and specificities were 53.2% and 98.1% (Carestart) 45.8% and 99.4% (Paracheck), respectively. Neither ROC analysis showed a significant disparity between mRDTs (Carestart: AUROC=0.75 vs Paracheck: AUROC=0.73), nor the reliability index showed disagreement between both mRDTs (Cronbach’s α = 0.92). However, there was significant disagreement between microscopy and mRDTs (Carestart: Kappa=0.58 vs Paracheck: Kappa=0.55). Conclusion: The use of a monobiomaker mRDTs in this study led to a significant variation between the ‘internal’ and ‘ecological’ validity metrics. Averagely, 84% of mRDT false negatives were confirmed by microscopy as non-falciparum species of plasmodium. The observed trends have and research policy implications. It is therefore, critical to accelerate the implementation of WHO’s recommendation to switch from mono to multiple biomarker (s) based mRDTs for detecting both falciparum and non-falciparum species. Extended research is needed to consolidate our understanding on the dynamics of malaria among our military personnel exposed to non-falciparum plasmodium.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Policy Planning\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Policy Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/ijhpp.02.02.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Policy Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/ijhpp.02.02.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
非恶性疟原虫向恶性疟原虫主要种群的增殖影响了基于单生物标记物的疟疾快速诊断试验(mRDT)的应用。本研究评估了基于单生物标志物的Carestart和Paracheck mRDTs的临床应用,这两种mRDTs在研究期间在加纳的一个军事医疗中心常规使用。方法:本研究旨在评估候选mrdt在加纳非恶性疟原虫种群暴露风险中的有效性。使用mrdt和显微镜作为金标准,从2020年6月和7月连续收集的207例发热患者的血液样本进行了疟疾寄生虫检测。患病率、效度和信度指标分别采用频率统计、受试者工作特征(ROC)和Kappa统计来确定。结果:镜检和候选mRDT检出率分别为23.2%和12.3%。敏感性为53.2%,特异性为98.1% (Carestart);敏感性为45.8%,特异性为99.4% (Paracheck)。ROC分析均未显示mrdt之间存在显著差异(Carestart: AUROC=0.75 vs Paracheck: AUROC=0.73),可靠性指标也未显示mrdt之间存在差异(Cronbach 's α = 0.92)。然而,显微镜和mrdt之间存在显著差异(Carestart: Kappa=0.58 vs Paracheck: Kappa=0.55)。结论:在本研究中使用单一生物制造商的mrdt导致了“内部”和“生态”有效性指标之间的显著差异。平均而言,84%的mRDT假阴性经显微镜检查证实为非恶性疟原虫。观察到的趋势具有和研究政策意义。因此,必须加快实施世卫组织的建议,将检测恶性疟原虫和非恶性疟原虫的基于单一生物标志物的mrdt转变为基于多种生物标志物的mrdt。需要进行更广泛的研究,以巩固我们对接触非恶性疟原虫的军事人员中疟疾动态的了解。
Clinical Utility of Mono-Biomarker based Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits at a Military Medical Centre in Ghana: A Prospective Pilot Study
Introduction: The proliferation of non-falciparum species of plasmodium into a predominant falciparum population compromises the utility of monobiomarker-based Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test (mRDT). This study evaluated the clinical utility of a monobiomarker-based Carestart and Paracheck mRDTs, which were in routine use at a Military Medical Centre in Ghana at the time of the study. Methods: The study was designed to assess the validity of candidate mRDTs among population risk of exposure to nonfalciparum species of plasmodium in Ghana. Blood samples collected from a consecutive series of 207 febrile patients in the months of June and July 2020, were tested for malaria parasites, using the mRDTs and microscopy as the gold standard. Prevalence, validity, and reliability metrics were determined using Frequentist, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC), and Kappa statistics, respectively. Results: The prevalence was 23.2% and 12.3% using microscopy and candidate mRDT, respectively. Sensitivities and specificities were 53.2% and 98.1% (Carestart) 45.8% and 99.4% (Paracheck), respectively. Neither ROC analysis showed a significant disparity between mRDTs (Carestart: AUROC=0.75 vs Paracheck: AUROC=0.73), nor the reliability index showed disagreement between both mRDTs (Cronbach’s α = 0.92). However, there was significant disagreement between microscopy and mRDTs (Carestart: Kappa=0.58 vs Paracheck: Kappa=0.55). Conclusion: The use of a monobiomaker mRDTs in this study led to a significant variation between the ‘internal’ and ‘ecological’ validity metrics. Averagely, 84% of mRDT false negatives were confirmed by microscopy as non-falciparum species of plasmodium. The observed trends have and research policy implications. It is therefore, critical to accelerate the implementation of WHO’s recommendation to switch from mono to multiple biomarker (s) based mRDTs for detecting both falciparum and non-falciparum species. Extended research is needed to consolidate our understanding on the dynamics of malaria among our military personnel exposed to non-falciparum plasmodium.