文学传记的出现

J. Darcy
{"title":"文学传记的出现","authors":"J. Darcy","doi":"10.1002/9781118896433.CH1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Literary biography—biographies of writers—emerged in the seventeenth century out of a tradition of historical biography and hagiography. Izaak Walton’s Life of John Donne (1640) and Life of George Herbert (1670) represent a bridge between idealized lives of saints and heroes and this new genre. Walton is innovatory in writing about the lives of poets, but he presents his subjects as exemplary men of God rather than as writers. Thomas Sprat’s Life of Cowley (1668) has long been seen as the first proper literary biography as it focuses on Cowley as a poet. Although a preface to The Works of Mr Abraham Cowley rather than a stand‐alone narrative, it is lengthy and incisive, generally considered as setting a standard unmatched until Johnson’s Life of Savage (1744). It is equally important as an early articulation of biographical methodology. Sprat’s insistence that we should seek to know no more about a writer than what that writer has chosen to reveal about himself in his published works would be the central plank of Wordsworth’s impassioned argument about intrusive literary biography over a century later in 1816. Sprat’s argument that Cowley has “given the World the best Image of his own mind in these immortal Monuments of his Wit” is usually taken as a simple ethical principle. But his insistence on biographical propriety in fact conceals his efforts to disguise awkward details of Cowley’s career as a spy and his unsuccessful political maneuvering during the Restoration (Darcy 2013, 26–39). But the issue of the extent to which biography should probe a writer’s private life remains a critical one today as does the often‐concealed politics of life writing. Cowley’s assumption that a poet is male will be echoed in biographical and critical writing throughout the eighteenth century, especially when copyright legislation gives commercial impetus to new anthologies of poetry, so crucial to canon formation.","PeriodicalId":188355,"journal":{"name":"A Companion to Literary Biography","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Emergence of Literary Biography\",\"authors\":\"J. Darcy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9781118896433.CH1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Literary biography—biographies of writers—emerged in the seventeenth century out of a tradition of historical biography and hagiography. Izaak Walton’s Life of John Donne (1640) and Life of George Herbert (1670) represent a bridge between idealized lives of saints and heroes and this new genre. Walton is innovatory in writing about the lives of poets, but he presents his subjects as exemplary men of God rather than as writers. Thomas Sprat’s Life of Cowley (1668) has long been seen as the first proper literary biography as it focuses on Cowley as a poet. Although a preface to The Works of Mr Abraham Cowley rather than a stand‐alone narrative, it is lengthy and incisive, generally considered as setting a standard unmatched until Johnson’s Life of Savage (1744). It is equally important as an early articulation of biographical methodology. Sprat’s insistence that we should seek to know no more about a writer than what that writer has chosen to reveal about himself in his published works would be the central plank of Wordsworth’s impassioned argument about intrusive literary biography over a century later in 1816. Sprat’s argument that Cowley has “given the World the best Image of his own mind in these immortal Monuments of his Wit” is usually taken as a simple ethical principle. But his insistence on biographical propriety in fact conceals his efforts to disguise awkward details of Cowley’s career as a spy and his unsuccessful political maneuvering during the Restoration (Darcy 2013, 26–39). But the issue of the extent to which biography should probe a writer’s private life remains a critical one today as does the often‐concealed politics of life writing. Cowley’s assumption that a poet is male will be echoed in biographical and critical writing throughout the eighteenth century, especially when copyright legislation gives commercial impetus to new anthologies of poetry, so crucial to canon formation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Companion to Literary Biography\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Companion to Literary Biography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118896433.CH1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Companion to Literary Biography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118896433.CH1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文学传记——作家传记——出现于17世纪,脱离了历史传记和圣徒传的传统。伊扎克·沃尔顿的《约翰·多恩的一生》(1640年)和《乔治·赫伯特的一生》(1670年)在圣徒和英雄的理想生活与这种新流派之间架起了一座桥梁。沃尔顿在描写诗人的生活方面有创新之处,但他把他的主题描绘成上帝的模范人物,而不是作家。托马斯·斯普拉特的《考利传》(1668)一直被认为是第一本真正意义上的文学传记,因为它把考利作为一个诗人来关注。虽然是《亚伯拉罕·考利先生的作品》的序言,而不是独立的叙述,但它冗长而深刻,被普遍认为是约翰逊的《野蛮人的生活》(1744)之前无与伦比的标准。它与传记方法论的早期阐述同样重要。斯普拉特坚持认为,我们不应该试图了解一个作家,而应该了解这位作家在他出版的作品中选择透露的关于他自己的信息。这是一个多世纪后的1816年,华兹华斯关于侵入式文学传记的慷慨激昂的论点的核心内容。斯普拉特的论点是,考利“在这些不朽的智慧纪念碑中,向世界展示了他自己心灵的最佳形象”,这通常被视为一条简单的伦理原则。但他对传记得体性的坚持,实际上掩盖了他努力掩盖考利间谍生涯的尴尬细节,以及他在复辟期间不成功的政治操纵(达西2013,26-39)。但是,传记应该在多大程度上探究作家的私人生活,这一问题在今天仍然是一个关键问题,就像生活写作中经常被隐藏的政治一样。考利关于诗人是男性的假设在整个18世纪的传记和评论写作中得到了回应,尤其是当版权立法为新的诗歌选集提供了商业动力时,这对经典的形成至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Emergence of Literary Biography
Literary biography—biographies of writers—emerged in the seventeenth century out of a tradition of historical biography and hagiography. Izaak Walton’s Life of John Donne (1640) and Life of George Herbert (1670) represent a bridge between idealized lives of saints and heroes and this new genre. Walton is innovatory in writing about the lives of poets, but he presents his subjects as exemplary men of God rather than as writers. Thomas Sprat’s Life of Cowley (1668) has long been seen as the first proper literary biography as it focuses on Cowley as a poet. Although a preface to The Works of Mr Abraham Cowley rather than a stand‐alone narrative, it is lengthy and incisive, generally considered as setting a standard unmatched until Johnson’s Life of Savage (1744). It is equally important as an early articulation of biographical methodology. Sprat’s insistence that we should seek to know no more about a writer than what that writer has chosen to reveal about himself in his published works would be the central plank of Wordsworth’s impassioned argument about intrusive literary biography over a century later in 1816. Sprat’s argument that Cowley has “given the World the best Image of his own mind in these immortal Monuments of his Wit” is usually taken as a simple ethical principle. But his insistence on biographical propriety in fact conceals his efforts to disguise awkward details of Cowley’s career as a spy and his unsuccessful political maneuvering during the Restoration (Darcy 2013, 26–39). But the issue of the extent to which biography should probe a writer’s private life remains a critical one today as does the often‐concealed politics of life writing. Cowley’s assumption that a poet is male will be echoed in biographical and critical writing throughout the eighteenth century, especially when copyright legislation gives commercial impetus to new anthologies of poetry, so crucial to canon formation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
After Ellmann Disappearing into the Front Page Reviewing the Lives and Works of Philip Larkin and Kingsley Amis Biography as Myth-Making Reading and Interpreting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1