高校学生与非高校学生智慧图书馆概念的差异:一种绘图分析方法

Y. Tu, Gwo-jen Hwang, Shu-Yen Chen, Chiu-Lin Lai, Chuan-Miao Chen
{"title":"高校学生与非高校学生智慧图书馆概念的差异:一种绘图分析方法","authors":"Y. Tu, Gwo-jen Hwang, Shu-Yen Chen, Chiu-Lin Lai, Chuan-Miao Chen","doi":"10.1108/el-07-2021-0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to compare similarities and differences in library and information science (LIS) and non-LIS undergraduates’ conceptions and perceptions of smart libraries via drawing analysis.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this study, a total of 156 undergraduate students described their perceptions of smart libraries as drawings and textual descriptions. A modified coding scheme with 8 categories and 51 subcategories was used to analyse the undergraduate students’ drawings.\n\n\nFindings\nMost of the undergraduate students’ conceptions of smart libraries still involve self-checkout and learning/reading, focusing on information appliances, technical services, activities and objects. The differences are that the LIS undergraduates’ drawings showed smart libraries with robots, interactive book borrowing with technology tools, intelligent services, location-aware services or mobile applications, whereas non-LIS undergraduates presented smart libraries as readers (learners), other activities and no smart technology services. LIS undergraduates focused on providing patron services with technologies. Non-LIS undergraduates were more likely to draw a complex space with immediate access to books or digital resources, quiet reading and the freedom to engage in library activities.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe results provide a baseline for future research on the topic and provide preliminary evidence of using the methods to discern LIS and non-LIS undergraduates’ conceptions of smart libraries.\n","PeriodicalId":330882,"journal":{"name":"Electron. Libr.","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences between LIS and non-LIS undergraduates' conceptions of smart libraries: a drawing analysis approach\",\"authors\":\"Y. Tu, Gwo-jen Hwang, Shu-Yen Chen, Chiu-Lin Lai, Chuan-Miao Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/el-07-2021-0129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to compare similarities and differences in library and information science (LIS) and non-LIS undergraduates’ conceptions and perceptions of smart libraries via drawing analysis.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nIn this study, a total of 156 undergraduate students described their perceptions of smart libraries as drawings and textual descriptions. A modified coding scheme with 8 categories and 51 subcategories was used to analyse the undergraduate students’ drawings.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nMost of the undergraduate students’ conceptions of smart libraries still involve self-checkout and learning/reading, focusing on information appliances, technical services, activities and objects. The differences are that the LIS undergraduates’ drawings showed smart libraries with robots, interactive book borrowing with technology tools, intelligent services, location-aware services or mobile applications, whereas non-LIS undergraduates presented smart libraries as readers (learners), other activities and no smart technology services. LIS undergraduates focused on providing patron services with technologies. Non-LIS undergraduates were more likely to draw a complex space with immediate access to books or digital resources, quiet reading and the freedom to engage in library activities.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe results provide a baseline for future research on the topic and provide preliminary evidence of using the methods to discern LIS and non-LIS undergraduates’ conceptions of smart libraries.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":330882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electron. Libr.\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electron. Libr.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/el-07-2021-0129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electron. Libr.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/el-07-2021-0129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的本研究旨在通过绘图分析,比较图书馆情报学与非图书馆情报学本科生对智慧图书馆的概念和认知的异同。设计/方法/方法在这项研究中,共有156名本科生用图纸和文字描述来描述他们对智能图书馆的看法。采用改进的8类51小类编码方案对大学生图画进行分析。大多数大学生对智能图书馆的概念仍然涉及自助借阅和学习/阅读,关注信息设备、技术服务、活动和对象。不同之处在于,LIS本科生的图纸展示了带有机器人的智能图书馆、带有技术工具的交互式借书、智能服务、位置感知服务或移动应用程序,而非LIS本科生将智能图书馆描绘为读者(学习者)、其他活动,没有智能技术服务。美国大学的本科生专注于用技术提供读者服务。非美国大学的本科生更有可能画出一个复杂的空间,可以立即获得书籍或数字资源,安静地阅读,自由地参与图书馆活动。原创性/价值研究结果为未来的研究提供了一个基线,并为使用这些方法来辨别大学和非大学本科生对智能图书馆的概念提供了初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences between LIS and non-LIS undergraduates' conceptions of smart libraries: a drawing analysis approach
Purpose This study aims to compare similarities and differences in library and information science (LIS) and non-LIS undergraduates’ conceptions and perceptions of smart libraries via drawing analysis. Design/methodology/approach In this study, a total of 156 undergraduate students described their perceptions of smart libraries as drawings and textual descriptions. A modified coding scheme with 8 categories and 51 subcategories was used to analyse the undergraduate students’ drawings. Findings Most of the undergraduate students’ conceptions of smart libraries still involve self-checkout and learning/reading, focusing on information appliances, technical services, activities and objects. The differences are that the LIS undergraduates’ drawings showed smart libraries with robots, interactive book borrowing with technology tools, intelligent services, location-aware services or mobile applications, whereas non-LIS undergraduates presented smart libraries as readers (learners), other activities and no smart technology services. LIS undergraduates focused on providing patron services with technologies. Non-LIS undergraduates were more likely to draw a complex space with immediate access to books or digital resources, quiet reading and the freedom to engage in library activities. Originality/value The results provide a baseline for future research on the topic and provide preliminary evidence of using the methods to discern LIS and non-LIS undergraduates’ conceptions of smart libraries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Model for integration of information and communication technologies in resource sharing practices for enhanced service delivery in academic libraries in southeast Nigeria Constructing a spatiotemporal situational awareness framework to sense the dynamic evolution of online public opinion on social media An investigation of linked data catalogue features in libraries, archives, and museums: a checklist approach Virtual and augmented reality as predictors of users' intention to use Lagos State Public Library, Lagos State, Nigeria Advanced intelligent health advice with informative summaries to facilitate treatment decision-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1