算法决策:通过经济实验检验人、技术和组织实践的相互作用

Anh Luong, Nanda Kumar, K. Lang
{"title":"算法决策:通过经济实验检验人、技术和组织实践的相互作用","authors":"Anh Luong, Nanda Kumar, K. Lang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3529679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human experts are being increasingly required to work with artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) in organizational decision-making. Using a large-scale historic dataset, we design and run an economic experiment where financially incentivized participants evaluate loan applications with the aid of an AI/ML. We find that humans and AI working together can surpass the AI itself and the humans working alone, under the right conditions. The performance of human-machine teams depends crucially on quality AI technology and well designed organizational practices. Importantly, when both are jointly put into place, firms most significantly increase their profits. We also find that, only when the AI/ML in use has adequate accuracy can the human-machine teams excel humans operating on their own. Otherwise, humans are actually better off working by themselves. We contribute to the emerging algorithmic decision-making literature by examining the properties of both AI/ML technology and organizational policies, in addition to accounting for the human decision makers' characteristics. Importantly, we highlight the importance of their interdependent effect on maximizing organizational outcomes. We especially contribute to the automation literature which investigates which tasks should and should not be automated. Our comparison of human-machine teams vs. machine goes beyond merely pitting human against the machine and is especially important given rising concerns about AI replacing human workers, exacerbating inequality, even eradicating the need for organizational structure. Our findings hold implications for firms wishing to build sustainable human-machine collaboration, that not only serves to increase organizational financial gains, but more importantly, also to understand more clearly the role of humans in the current constantly changing employment landscape due to the rapid advances in AI/ML every day.","PeriodicalId":129898,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Digital Anthropology (Sub-Topic)","volume":"24 26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithmic Decision-Making: Examining the Interplay of People, Technology, and Organizational Practices through an Economic Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Anh Luong, Nanda Kumar, K. Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3529679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human experts are being increasingly required to work with artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) in organizational decision-making. Using a large-scale historic dataset, we design and run an economic experiment where financially incentivized participants evaluate loan applications with the aid of an AI/ML. We find that humans and AI working together can surpass the AI itself and the humans working alone, under the right conditions. The performance of human-machine teams depends crucially on quality AI technology and well designed organizational practices. Importantly, when both are jointly put into place, firms most significantly increase their profits. We also find that, only when the AI/ML in use has adequate accuracy can the human-machine teams excel humans operating on their own. Otherwise, humans are actually better off working by themselves. We contribute to the emerging algorithmic decision-making literature by examining the properties of both AI/ML technology and organizational policies, in addition to accounting for the human decision makers' characteristics. Importantly, we highlight the importance of their interdependent effect on maximizing organizational outcomes. We especially contribute to the automation literature which investigates which tasks should and should not be automated. Our comparison of human-machine teams vs. machine goes beyond merely pitting human against the machine and is especially important given rising concerns about AI replacing human workers, exacerbating inequality, even eradicating the need for organizational structure. Our findings hold implications for firms wishing to build sustainable human-machine collaboration, that not only serves to increase organizational financial gains, but more importantly, also to understand more clearly the role of humans in the current constantly changing employment landscape due to the rapid advances in AI/ML every day.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DecisionSciRN: Digital Anthropology (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"24 26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DecisionSciRN: Digital Anthropology (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3529679\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Digital Anthropology (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3529679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

越来越多的人类专家被要求在组织决策中使用人工智能和机器学习(AI/ML)。使用大规模的历史数据集,我们设计并运行了一个经济实验,在这个实验中,受经济激励的参与者在AI/ML的帮助下评估贷款申请。我们发现,在适当的条件下,人类和人工智能一起工作可以超越人工智能本身和人类单独工作。人机团队的表现在很大程度上取决于高质量的人工智能技术和精心设计的组织实践。重要的是,当两者同时实施时,企业的利润会显著增加。我们还发现,只有当使用的AI/ML具有足够的准确性时,人机团队才能超越独立操作的人类。否则,人类自己工作实际上会更好。除了考虑人类决策者的特征外,我们还通过研究AI/ML技术和组织政策的特性,为新兴的算法决策文献做出了贡献。重要的是,我们强调了它们对最大化组织成果的相互依存影响的重要性。我们特别致力于研究哪些任务应该自动化,哪些任务不应该自动化的自动化文献。我们对人机团队与机器的比较不仅仅是人类与机器的较量,而且在人工智能取代人类工人、加剧不平等、甚至消除组织结构需求的担忧日益加剧的情况下,这一点尤为重要。我们的研究结果对希望建立可持续人机协作的公司具有启示意义,这不仅有助于增加组织的财务收益,更重要的是,由于人工智能/机器学习每天都在快速发展,因此也可以更清楚地了解人类在当前不断变化的就业环境中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Algorithmic Decision-Making: Examining the Interplay of People, Technology, and Organizational Practices through an Economic Experiment
Human experts are being increasingly required to work with artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) in organizational decision-making. Using a large-scale historic dataset, we design and run an economic experiment where financially incentivized participants evaluate loan applications with the aid of an AI/ML. We find that humans and AI working together can surpass the AI itself and the humans working alone, under the right conditions. The performance of human-machine teams depends crucially on quality AI technology and well designed organizational practices. Importantly, when both are jointly put into place, firms most significantly increase their profits. We also find that, only when the AI/ML in use has adequate accuracy can the human-machine teams excel humans operating on their own. Otherwise, humans are actually better off working by themselves. We contribute to the emerging algorithmic decision-making literature by examining the properties of both AI/ML technology and organizational policies, in addition to accounting for the human decision makers' characteristics. Importantly, we highlight the importance of their interdependent effect on maximizing organizational outcomes. We especially contribute to the automation literature which investigates which tasks should and should not be automated. Our comparison of human-machine teams vs. machine goes beyond merely pitting human against the machine and is especially important given rising concerns about AI replacing human workers, exacerbating inequality, even eradicating the need for organizational structure. Our findings hold implications for firms wishing to build sustainable human-machine collaboration, that not only serves to increase organizational financial gains, but more importantly, also to understand more clearly the role of humans in the current constantly changing employment landscape due to the rapid advances in AI/ML every day.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Algorithmic Decision-Making: Examining the Interplay of People, Technology, and Organizational Practices through an Economic Experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1