夸张与潜力:技术在法律教育中的限制与前景

Colin Crawford
{"title":"夸张与潜力:技术在法律教育中的限制与前景","authors":"Colin Crawford","doi":"10.29263/lar10.2023.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to assess the extent of technology’s benefits for legal education. The ar- gument makes two main claims. First, it argues that an understanding of the neuroscience of learning may focus and ground legal and other educators on the possible benefits and roles of technology in education. Second, it argues that, once this is done, technology can be applied to democratize access to legal education. The article concludes, however, by pointing out areas of risk and concern regarding this project.","PeriodicalId":348032,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wild Exaggeration and Vast Potential: Technology’s Limits and Promise in Legal Education\",\"authors\":\"Colin Crawford\",\"doi\":\"10.29263/lar10.2023.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article is to assess the extent of technology’s benefits for legal education. The ar- gument makes two main claims. First, it argues that an understanding of the neuroscience of learning may focus and ground legal and other educators on the possible benefits and roles of technology in education. Second, it argues that, once this is done, technology can be applied to democratize access to legal education. The article concludes, however, by pointing out areas of risk and concern regarding this project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Law Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29263/lar10.2023.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29263/lar10.2023.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是评估技术对法律教育的益处程度。该论点提出了两个主要主张。首先,它认为,对学习的神经科学的理解可能会使法律和其他教育工作者关注技术在教育中可能带来的好处和作用。其次,它认为,一旦做到了这一点,技术就可以应用于法律教育的民主化。然而,文章最后指出了这个项目的风险和关注领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wild Exaggeration and Vast Potential: Technology’s Limits and Promise in Legal Education
The purpose of this article is to assess the extent of technology’s benefits for legal education. The ar- gument makes two main claims. First, it argues that an understanding of the neuroscience of learning may focus and ground legal and other educators on the possible benefits and roles of technology in education. Second, it argues that, once this is done, technology can be applied to democratize access to legal education. The article concludes, however, by pointing out areas of risk and concern regarding this project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Derechos Humanos: de la poesía a los estados financieros, una predicción de cómo el marco ASG, ambiente, social y gobernanza, lo puede cambiar todo Democratic engineering: Plan Colombia, Constitutionalisation and hegemonic presidential powers in Latin America (1970-2022) From National to International: The Evolutionof Constitutional Jurisprudence on Amparo Actionsagainst Arbitral Awards in Colombia La paz en el espejo del constitucionalismo colombiano: la promesa incómoda de la Constituyente de 1991 y su resignificación en el constitucionalismo de la transición El derecho de la competencia de la Comunidad Andina frente a la sostenibilidad ambiental
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1