大规模数据事件相关分析的概念和实践步骤

EVENTS@ACL Pub Date : 2014-06-01 DOI:10.3115/v1/W14-2906
Fatemeh Torabi Asr, J. Sonntag, Yulia Grishina, Manfred Stede
{"title":"大规模数据事件相关分析的概念和实践步骤","authors":"Fatemeh Torabi Asr, J. Sonntag, Yulia Grishina, Manfred Stede","doi":"10.3115/v1/W14-2906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A simple conceptual model is employed to investigate events, and break the task of coreference resolution into two steps: semantic class detection and similaritybased matching. With this perspective an algorithm is implemented to cluster event mentions in a large-scale corpus. Results on test data from AQUAINT TimeML, which we annotated manually with coreference links, reveal how semantic conventions vs. information available in the context of event mentions affect decisions in coreference analysis.","PeriodicalId":392223,"journal":{"name":"EVENTS@ACL","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptual and Practical Steps in Event Coreference Analysis of Large-scale Data\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Torabi Asr, J. Sonntag, Yulia Grishina, Manfred Stede\",\"doi\":\"10.3115/v1/W14-2906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A simple conceptual model is employed to investigate events, and break the task of coreference resolution into two steps: semantic class detection and similaritybased matching. With this perspective an algorithm is implemented to cluster event mentions in a large-scale corpus. Results on test data from AQUAINT TimeML, which we annotated manually with coreference links, reveal how semantic conventions vs. information available in the context of event mentions affect decisions in coreference analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":392223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EVENTS@ACL\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EVENTS@ACL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-2906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EVENTS@ACL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-2906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

该方法采用一个简单的概念模型来研究事件,并将共引用解析任务分为语义类检测和基于相似度的匹配两步。从这个角度来看,实现了一种算法来对大规模语料库中的事件提及进行聚类。来自AQUAINT TimeML的测试数据的结果显示,在事件提及的上下文中,语义约定与可用信息是如何影响共同引用分析中的决策的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conceptual and Practical Steps in Event Coreference Analysis of Large-scale Data
A simple conceptual model is employed to investigate events, and break the task of coreference resolution into two steps: semantic class detection and similaritybased matching. With this perspective an algorithm is implemented to cluster event mentions in a large-scale corpus. Results on test data from AQUAINT TimeML, which we annotated manually with coreference links, reveal how semantic conventions vs. information available in the context of event mentions affect decisions in coreference analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Augmenting FrameNet Via PPDB Evaluation for Partial Event Coreference Inter-annotator Agreement for ERE annotation Challenges of Adding Causation to Richer Event Descriptions Unsupervised Techniques for Extracting and Clustering Complex Events in News
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1