6%柠檬酸与壳聚糖对去髓乳牙根管冲洗效果的比较研究。(一项临床、放射学和微生物学研究)

abdelrahman elasas, I. Barakat, A. Ibrahim, Ahmed Bastawy
{"title":"6%柠檬酸与壳聚糖对去髓乳牙根管冲洗效果的比较研究。(一项临床、放射学和微生物学研究)","authors":"abdelrahman elasas, I. Barakat, A. Ibrahim, Ahmed Bastawy","doi":"10.21608/ajdsm.2021.103936.1264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: In primary teeth, the clinical success of pulpectomy depends on the eradication of pathogenic microorganisms from the infected canals . Thus, this study was directed to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of citric acid and chitosan in comparison with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on E. faecalis. S ubjects and Methods: A total of 30 children aged between 4-7 years were included in the present study. The enrolled children had primary carious teeth that were indicated for pulpectomy treatment. The involved teeth were categorized into three main groups according to the type of irrigant solution; 6% citric acid (A), 6% chitosan (B), and 1% NaOCl (C). Then each main group was further subdivided into non-activated (A1, B1, and C1) or ultrasonic activated (A2, B2, and C2). E. faecalis count was carried out using a colony-forming unit (CFU). Results: All tested irrigants with and without activation showed a significant reduction in E. faecalis count. The ultrasonic activation significantly improves the antibacterial effect of the tested irrigant. In comparison between the tested irrigants, there was a significant difference. The higher reduction in E. faecalis count was recorded with 1% NaOCl followed by 6% chitosan. The use of 6% citric acid has a lower effect among the tested irrigants. Conclusion: Activation of irrigant solution significantly improves their antibacterial effect. chitosan has a significant effect on the reduction of E. faecalis count. Citric acid cannot be used alone as an irrigant solution.","PeriodicalId":117944,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of 6% Citric acid and Chitosan as irrigants on root canals of pulpectomized primary teeth. (A clinical, Radio graphical and Microbiological study)\",\"authors\":\"abdelrahman elasas, I. Barakat, A. Ibrahim, Ahmed Bastawy\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ajdsm.2021.103936.1264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: In primary teeth, the clinical success of pulpectomy depends on the eradication of pathogenic microorganisms from the infected canals . Thus, this study was directed to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of citric acid and chitosan in comparison with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on E. faecalis. S ubjects and Methods: A total of 30 children aged between 4-7 years were included in the present study. The enrolled children had primary carious teeth that were indicated for pulpectomy treatment. The involved teeth were categorized into three main groups according to the type of irrigant solution; 6% citric acid (A), 6% chitosan (B), and 1% NaOCl (C). Then each main group was further subdivided into non-activated (A1, B1, and C1) or ultrasonic activated (A2, B2, and C2). E. faecalis count was carried out using a colony-forming unit (CFU). Results: All tested irrigants with and without activation showed a significant reduction in E. faecalis count. The ultrasonic activation significantly improves the antibacterial effect of the tested irrigant. In comparison between the tested irrigants, there was a significant difference. The higher reduction in E. faecalis count was recorded with 1% NaOCl followed by 6% chitosan. The use of 6% citric acid has a lower effect among the tested irrigants. Conclusion: Activation of irrigant solution significantly improves their antibacterial effect. chitosan has a significant effect on the reduction of E. faecalis count. Citric acid cannot be used alone as an irrigant solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2021.103936.1264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2021.103936.1264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在乳牙中,牙髓切除术的临床成功取决于感染根管中病原微生物的根除。因此,本研究旨在评价柠檬酸和壳聚糖与次氯酸钠(NaOCl)对粪肠杆菌的抑菌效果。研究对象和方法:选取年龄在4 ~ 7岁的儿童30例。入组的儿童患有原发性龋齿,需要进行牙髓切除治疗。根据冲洗液的类型,将涉及的牙齿分为三大类;6%柠檬酸(A), 6%壳聚糖(B)和1% NaOCl (C)。然后将每个主要组进一步细分为非活化组(A1, B1和C1)或超声活化组(A2, B2和C2)。使用集落形成单位(CFU)进行粪肠球菌计数。结果:所有测试的灌溉水在激活和未激活的情况下都显示出粪肠球菌计数的显著减少。超声活化显著提高了冲洗液的抗菌效果。在被试灌溉水之间的比较中,存在显著差异。1%的NaOCl和6%的壳聚糖对粪肠球菌数量的减少幅度较大。使用6%柠檬酸的灌溉效果较低。结论:冲洗液活化后可显著提高其抗菌效果。壳聚糖对减少粪肠球菌计数有显著作用。柠檬酸不能单独用作灌溉溶液。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Evaluation of 6% Citric acid and Chitosan as irrigants on root canals of pulpectomized primary teeth. (A clinical, Radio graphical and Microbiological study)
Objectives: In primary teeth, the clinical success of pulpectomy depends on the eradication of pathogenic microorganisms from the infected canals . Thus, this study was directed to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of citric acid and chitosan in comparison with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on E. faecalis. S ubjects and Methods: A total of 30 children aged between 4-7 years were included in the present study. The enrolled children had primary carious teeth that were indicated for pulpectomy treatment. The involved teeth were categorized into three main groups according to the type of irrigant solution; 6% citric acid (A), 6% chitosan (B), and 1% NaOCl (C). Then each main group was further subdivided into non-activated (A1, B1, and C1) or ultrasonic activated (A2, B2, and C2). E. faecalis count was carried out using a colony-forming unit (CFU). Results: All tested irrigants with and without activation showed a significant reduction in E. faecalis count. The ultrasonic activation significantly improves the antibacterial effect of the tested irrigant. In comparison between the tested irrigants, there was a significant difference. The higher reduction in E. faecalis count was recorded with 1% NaOCl followed by 6% chitosan. The use of 6% citric acid has a lower effect among the tested irrigants. Conclusion: Activation of irrigant solution significantly improves their antibacterial effect. chitosan has a significant effect on the reduction of E. faecalis count. Citric acid cannot be used alone as an irrigant solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical effect of titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin and platelet- rich fibrin in treatment of gingival recession Fracture resistance of CAD CAM endocrowns bonded to teeth with different number of remaining walls :An In-Vitro Study. Evaluation of the effect of vitamin D on the salivary and serum levels of interleukin-8 in patients with periodontitis stage I and II grade A. The Effectiveness Of Topical Avocado In The Treatment Of Minor Recurrent Aphthous Ulceration: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Modulus of Elasticity of Different Resin Denture Base Materials: A Comparative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1