{"title":"语言设计与验证编译器(主题演讲)","authors":"David J. Pearce","doi":"10.1145/3564719.3570917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dream of developing compilers that automatically verify whether or not programs meet their specifications remains an ongoing challenge. Such \"verifying compilers\" are (finally) on the verge of entering mainstream software development. This is partly due to advancements made over the last few decades, but also to the increasingly significant and complex role software plays in the modern world. As computer scientists, we should encourage this transition and help relegate many forms of software error to the history books. One way of increasing adoption is to design languages around these tools which look, on the surface, like regular programming languages. That is, to seamlessly integrate specification and verification and offer something that, for the everyday programmer, appears as nothing more than glorified type checking. This requires, amongst other things, careful consideration as to which language features mesh well with verification, and which do not. The design space here is interesting and subtle, but has been largely overlooked. In this talk, I will attempt to shed light on this murky area by contrasting the choices made in two existing languages: Dafny and Whiley.","PeriodicalId":423660,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Generative Programming: Concepts and Experiences","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language Design Meets Verifying Compilers (Keynote)\",\"authors\":\"David J. Pearce\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3564719.3570917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The dream of developing compilers that automatically verify whether or not programs meet their specifications remains an ongoing challenge. Such \\\"verifying compilers\\\" are (finally) on the verge of entering mainstream software development. This is partly due to advancements made over the last few decades, but also to the increasingly significant and complex role software plays in the modern world. As computer scientists, we should encourage this transition and help relegate many forms of software error to the history books. One way of increasing adoption is to design languages around these tools which look, on the surface, like regular programming languages. That is, to seamlessly integrate specification and verification and offer something that, for the everyday programmer, appears as nothing more than glorified type checking. This requires, amongst other things, careful consideration as to which language features mesh well with verification, and which do not. The design space here is interesting and subtle, but has been largely overlooked. In this talk, I will attempt to shed light on this murky area by contrasting the choices made in two existing languages: Dafny and Whiley.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Generative Programming: Concepts and Experiences\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Generative Programming: Concepts and Experiences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3564719.3570917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Generative Programming: Concepts and Experiences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3564719.3570917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开发自动验证程序是否符合其规范的编译器的梦想仍然是一个持续的挑战。这样的“验证编译器”(最终)即将进入主流软件开发。这部分是由于过去几十年取得的进步,但也是由于软件在现代世界中扮演的日益重要和复杂的角色。作为计算机科学家,我们应该鼓励这种转变,并帮助将许多形式的软件错误载入史册。增加采用的一种方法是围绕这些工具设计语言,这些语言表面上看起来像常规的编程语言。也就是说,无缝地集成规范和验证,并提供一些东西,对于日常程序员来说,看起来只不过是美化的类型检查。除其他事项外,这需要仔细考虑哪些语言特性适合验证,哪些不适合。这里的设计空间有趣而微妙,但在很大程度上被忽视了。在这次演讲中,我将通过对比两种现有语言(Dafny和Whiley)所做的选择来阐明这个模糊的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Language Design Meets Verifying Compilers (Keynote)
The dream of developing compilers that automatically verify whether or not programs meet their specifications remains an ongoing challenge. Such "verifying compilers" are (finally) on the verge of entering mainstream software development. This is partly due to advancements made over the last few decades, but also to the increasingly significant and complex role software plays in the modern world. As computer scientists, we should encourage this transition and help relegate many forms of software error to the history books. One way of increasing adoption is to design languages around these tools which look, on the surface, like regular programming languages. That is, to seamlessly integrate specification and verification and offer something that, for the everyday programmer, appears as nothing more than glorified type checking. This requires, amongst other things, careful consideration as to which language features mesh well with verification, and which do not. The design space here is interesting and subtle, but has been largely overlooked. In this talk, I will attempt to shed light on this murky area by contrasting the choices made in two existing languages: Dafny and Whiley.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Modern C++ Point of View of Programming in Image Processing Language Support for Refactorability Decay Prevention Model-Driven IoT App Stores: Deploying Customizable Software Products to Heterogeneous Devices Generic Solution-Space Sampling for Multi-domain Product Lines Dynamic Replanning of Multi-drone Missions using Dynamic Forward Slicing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1