用生理数据监测评价空防队员心理负荷与问卷法比较

P. Kutílek, J. Hejda, P. Volf, V. Křivánek, Ludek Cicmanec, K. Hána, P. Smrcka, I. Fajnerová
{"title":"用生理数据监测评价空防队员心理负荷与问卷法比较","authors":"P. Kutílek, J. Hejda, P. Volf, V. Křivánek, Ludek Cicmanec, K. Hána, P. Smrcka, I. Fajnerová","doi":"10.1109/ME49197.2020.9286626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to evaluate psychological load assessment methods in air defense members. The study is based on physiological data monitoring and compares this method with traditional questionnaire evaluation methods. Measurement using a biotelemetric system was conducted while training in flight simulators. A total of 28 subjects/soldiers were divided into seven four-member teams consisting of two pilots, an air traffic controller and a member of ground support. Physiological data was collected and monitored for all subjects during a mission flight operation. Calculations of the R-R interval length and respiratory rate were performed for all soldiers involved. Statistical analysis, i.e. the calculation of the median, maximum, minimum, first quartile and third quartile were used for physiological data presentation and the quantitative evaluation of mental stress. These results were then compared with results showing the subjective degree of psychological stress load, as determined by the questionnaire evaluation method. A simple rating scales repeatedly evaluated by individual subjects were used to determine their subjective level of mental stress before and after individual phases of the training. The data for takeoff, landing, horizontal flight and fall were evaluated and compared. Then the results for both evaluation approaches (physiological data measurement and questionnaire-based subjective evaluation) were compared. Since the normal data distribution was not shown, statistical evaluation was conducted through non-parametric tests. Based on the calculated values of the physiological parameters compared with the determined value of the questionnaire method’s rating scale, it was found that with increasing mental load determined by the subjective evaluation method, the length of the R-R interval decreased and the respiratory rate increased. These conclusions were consistent for different flight phases and within the groups of pilots, air traffic controllers and ground support members.","PeriodicalId":166043,"journal":{"name":"2020 19th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika (ME)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Psychological Load of Air Defense Members by Physiological Data Monitoring Compared to the Questionnaire Evaluation Method\",\"authors\":\"P. Kutílek, J. Hejda, P. Volf, V. Křivánek, Ludek Cicmanec, K. Hána, P. Smrcka, I. Fajnerová\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ME49197.2020.9286626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to evaluate psychological load assessment methods in air defense members. The study is based on physiological data monitoring and compares this method with traditional questionnaire evaluation methods. Measurement using a biotelemetric system was conducted while training in flight simulators. A total of 28 subjects/soldiers were divided into seven four-member teams consisting of two pilots, an air traffic controller and a member of ground support. Physiological data was collected and monitored for all subjects during a mission flight operation. Calculations of the R-R interval length and respiratory rate were performed for all soldiers involved. Statistical analysis, i.e. the calculation of the median, maximum, minimum, first quartile and third quartile were used for physiological data presentation and the quantitative evaluation of mental stress. These results were then compared with results showing the subjective degree of psychological stress load, as determined by the questionnaire evaluation method. A simple rating scales repeatedly evaluated by individual subjects were used to determine their subjective level of mental stress before and after individual phases of the training. The data for takeoff, landing, horizontal flight and fall were evaluated and compared. Then the results for both evaluation approaches (physiological data measurement and questionnaire-based subjective evaluation) were compared. Since the normal data distribution was not shown, statistical evaluation was conducted through non-parametric tests. Based on the calculated values of the physiological parameters compared with the determined value of the questionnaire method’s rating scale, it was found that with increasing mental load determined by the subjective evaluation method, the length of the R-R interval decreased and the respiratory rate increased. These conclusions were consistent for different flight phases and within the groups of pilots, air traffic controllers and ground support members.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 19th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika (ME)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 19th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika (ME)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ME49197.2020.9286626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 19th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika (ME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ME49197.2020.9286626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在探讨空防队员心理负荷评估方法。本研究基于生理数据监测,并将该方法与传统的问卷评估方法进行比较。在飞行模拟器训练时,使用生物遥测系统进行测量。共有28名受试者/士兵被分成7个4人小组,由两名飞行员、一名空中交通管制员和一名地面支援人员组成。在一次飞行任务中收集和监测所有受试者的生理数据。计算所有参与的士兵的R-R间隔长度和呼吸频率。生理数据的呈现和心理压力的定量评价采用统计分析,即计算中位数、最大值、最小值、第一四分位数和第三四分位数。然后将这些结果与问卷评估法确定的主观心理压力负荷程度的结果进行比较。采用简单的评定量表对受试者进行反复评估,以确定受试者在训练前后的主观精神压力水平。对起飞、降落、水平飞行和坠落的数据进行了评估和比较。然后比较两种评价方法(生理数据测量法和问卷主观评价法)的结果。由于未显示正态数据分布,故采用非参数检验进行统计评价。将生理参数的计算值与问卷法评定量表的确定值进行比较,发现主观评定法确定的脑力负荷越大,R-R间隔时间越短,呼吸频率越高。这些结论在不同的飞行阶段以及飞行员、空中交通管制员和地面支持人员的小组中是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Psychological Load of Air Defense Members by Physiological Data Monitoring Compared to the Questionnaire Evaluation Method
This paper aims to evaluate psychological load assessment methods in air defense members. The study is based on physiological data monitoring and compares this method with traditional questionnaire evaluation methods. Measurement using a biotelemetric system was conducted while training in flight simulators. A total of 28 subjects/soldiers were divided into seven four-member teams consisting of two pilots, an air traffic controller and a member of ground support. Physiological data was collected and monitored for all subjects during a mission flight operation. Calculations of the R-R interval length and respiratory rate were performed for all soldiers involved. Statistical analysis, i.e. the calculation of the median, maximum, minimum, first quartile and third quartile were used for physiological data presentation and the quantitative evaluation of mental stress. These results were then compared with results showing the subjective degree of psychological stress load, as determined by the questionnaire evaluation method. A simple rating scales repeatedly evaluated by individual subjects were used to determine their subjective level of mental stress before and after individual phases of the training. The data for takeoff, landing, horizontal flight and fall were evaluated and compared. Then the results for both evaluation approaches (physiological data measurement and questionnaire-based subjective evaluation) were compared. Since the normal data distribution was not shown, statistical evaluation was conducted through non-parametric tests. Based on the calculated values of the physiological parameters compared with the determined value of the questionnaire method’s rating scale, it was found that with increasing mental load determined by the subjective evaluation method, the length of the R-R interval decreased and the respiratory rate increased. These conclusions were consistent for different flight phases and within the groups of pilots, air traffic controllers and ground support members.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ME 2020 Cover Page Vibration Shapes Identification Applying Eulerian Video Magnification on Coffee Fruits to Study the Selective Harvesting Determinations of Stator Windings Thermal Model with Various Filling Factor Production of Polymer Frame Composites Using Industrial Robots The frequency characteristics of cyclic symmetry silicon gyroscope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1