大学生预期性心理契约:如何平衡义务与诱因?

Biljana Blazhevska Stoilkovska, Zorica Markovikj
{"title":"大学生预期性心理契约:如何平衡义务与诱因?","authors":"Biljana Blazhevska Stoilkovska, Zorica Markovikj","doi":"10.47054/psyscip219-10041bs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anticipatory psychological contract (APC) defined as individuals’ beliefs about their prospective employment, including obligations to the future employers and in ducements they expect to receive in return might be seen as a valuable framework to understand graduate students’ expectations about prospective employment rela tionships. Accordingly, the aim of this paper was to explore how final year university students from two study groups, technical and psychology, perceived obligations to future em ployers and inducements they expect to receive in return. The sample consisted of 138 participants (psychology=82 and technical studies=56) from RN Macedonia and Serbia. To assess APC content questionnaire with 48 statements was applied. Cron bach alpha reliability of the employee contributions and employer inducements sub scales was 0.71 and 0.91, respectively. Independent t-test revealed that technical studies students had significantly high er expectations concerning relational and transactional obligations in the prospec tive employment relationship than psychology students. Paired samples t-test was performed to analyze differences in anticipated relational obligations and relational inducements, as well as, transactional obligations and transactional inducements. Results showed that students hold higher expectations about inducements from the prospective organization than to their own contributions in the working environ ment. Results are discussed in light of their importance for HRM practices in orga -nizations.","PeriodicalId":412710,"journal":{"name":"Психологија наука и практика/Psychology science and practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The anticipatory psychological contract among university students: How to balance between obligations and inducements?\",\"authors\":\"Biljana Blazhevska Stoilkovska, Zorica Markovikj\",\"doi\":\"10.47054/psyscip219-10041bs\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anticipatory psychological contract (APC) defined as individuals’ beliefs about their prospective employment, including obligations to the future employers and in ducements they expect to receive in return might be seen as a valuable framework to understand graduate students’ expectations about prospective employment rela tionships. Accordingly, the aim of this paper was to explore how final year university students from two study groups, technical and psychology, perceived obligations to future em ployers and inducements they expect to receive in return. The sample consisted of 138 participants (psychology=82 and technical studies=56) from RN Macedonia and Serbia. To assess APC content questionnaire with 48 statements was applied. Cron bach alpha reliability of the employee contributions and employer inducements sub scales was 0.71 and 0.91, respectively. Independent t-test revealed that technical studies students had significantly high er expectations concerning relational and transactional obligations in the prospec tive employment relationship than psychology students. Paired samples t-test was performed to analyze differences in anticipated relational obligations and relational inducements, as well as, transactional obligations and transactional inducements. Results showed that students hold higher expectations about inducements from the prospective organization than to their own contributions in the working environ ment. Results are discussed in light of their importance for HRM practices in orga -nizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":412710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Психологија наука и практика/Psychology science and practice\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Психологија наука и практика/Psychology science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47054/psyscip219-10041bs\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Психологија наука и практика/Psychology science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47054/psyscip219-10041bs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预期心理契约(APC)被定义为个人对未来就业的信念,包括对未来雇主的义务和他们期望得到的回报,可以被视为理解研究生对未来就业关系期望的一个有价值的框架。因此,本文的目的是探讨来自技术和心理学两个研究小组的应届大学生如何感知对未来雇主的义务和他们期望获得回报的激励。样本包括来自马其顿共和国和塞尔维亚的138名参与者(心理学=82名,技术研究=56名)。采用48项问卷对APC内容进行评估。雇员供款和雇主激励分量表的Cron bach α信度分别为0.71和0.91。独立t检验显示,技术专业学生对未来就业关系中关系义务和交易义务的期望显著高于心理专业学生。采用配对样本t检验分析预期关系义务和关系诱因、交易义务和交易诱因的差异。结果表明,学生对未来组织的激励期望高于对自己在工作环境中的贡献的期望。结果讨论在光对人力资源管理实践在组织的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The anticipatory psychological contract among university students: How to balance between obligations and inducements?
Anticipatory psychological contract (APC) defined as individuals’ beliefs about their prospective employment, including obligations to the future employers and in ducements they expect to receive in return might be seen as a valuable framework to understand graduate students’ expectations about prospective employment rela tionships. Accordingly, the aim of this paper was to explore how final year university students from two study groups, technical and psychology, perceived obligations to future em ployers and inducements they expect to receive in return. The sample consisted of 138 participants (psychology=82 and technical studies=56) from RN Macedonia and Serbia. To assess APC content questionnaire with 48 statements was applied. Cron bach alpha reliability of the employee contributions and employer inducements sub scales was 0.71 and 0.91, respectively. Independent t-test revealed that technical studies students had significantly high er expectations concerning relational and transactional obligations in the prospec tive employment relationship than psychology students. Paired samples t-test was performed to analyze differences in anticipated relational obligations and relational inducements, as well as, transactional obligations and transactional inducements. Results showed that students hold higher expectations about inducements from the prospective organization than to their own contributions in the working environ ment. Results are discussed in light of their importance for HRM practices in orga -nizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What no one tells you: a guide to your emotions from pregnancy to motherhood, by Alexandra Sacks and Catherine Birndorf Aesthetic experience and empathy Симптоми на адхд, ескепистичка мотивација и пол како предиктори на зависноста од играње видеоигри Demographic differences in work engagement in the private educational institutions in republic of North Macedonia Attitudes towards sexual minorities among students who prepare Themselves in helping professions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1