分离主义冲突的外部安全理论

Ahsan I. Butt
{"title":"分离主义冲突的外部安全理论","authors":"Ahsan I. Butt","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501713941.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on the states' decision-making at the point at which an ethno-nationalist movement has made a demand or declaration of independence or significant autonomy. It aims at deconstructing the state's calculus at that precise moment. To build the theory, the chapter relies on three assumptions: first, it assumes that actors are strategic and forward looking; second, it assumes that states are more powerful than substate actors; and third, it treats states as “unitary” actors, a long-standing assumption in international relations. The chapter then shifts to elaborate on why secession represents a significant shift in the balance of power. It discusses how the creation of a new state leaves the host state more vulnerable to the ethnic group, generally speaking. The chapter then outlines the states' two related concerns about the external security implications of any secessionist movement.","PeriodicalId":319701,"journal":{"name":"Secession and Security","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An External Security Theory of Secessionist Conflict\",\"authors\":\"Ahsan I. Butt\",\"doi\":\"10.7591/cornell/9781501713941.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter focuses on the states' decision-making at the point at which an ethno-nationalist movement has made a demand or declaration of independence or significant autonomy. It aims at deconstructing the state's calculus at that precise moment. To build the theory, the chapter relies on three assumptions: first, it assumes that actors are strategic and forward looking; second, it assumes that states are more powerful than substate actors; and third, it treats states as “unitary” actors, a long-standing assumption in international relations. The chapter then shifts to elaborate on why secession represents a significant shift in the balance of power. It discusses how the creation of a new state leaves the host state more vulnerable to the ethnic group, generally speaking. The chapter then outlines the states' two related concerns about the external security implications of any secessionist movement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Secession and Security\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Secession and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501713941.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Secession and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501713941.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本章的重点是在民族主义运动提出要求或宣布独立或重大自治时,国家的决策。它的目的是在那个精确的时刻解构国家的微积分。为了构建这一理论,本章依赖于三个假设:首先,它假设行为者具有战略性和前瞻性;其次,它假设国家比次国家行为体更强大;第三,它将国家视为“单一的”行为体,这是国际关系中的一个长期假设。然后,这一章转而详细阐述了为什么脱离联邦代表了权力平衡的重大转变。一般来说,它讨论了一个新国家的建立如何使东道国更容易受到种族群体的攻击。然后,本章概述了各州对任何分离主义运动的外部安全影响的两个相关关切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An External Security Theory of Secessionist Conflict
This chapter focuses on the states' decision-making at the point at which an ethno-nationalist movement has made a demand or declaration of independence or significant autonomy. It aims at deconstructing the state's calculus at that precise moment. To build the theory, the chapter relies on three assumptions: first, it assumes that actors are strategic and forward looking; second, it assumes that states are more powerful than substate actors; and third, it treats states as “unitary” actors, a long-standing assumption in international relations. The chapter then shifts to elaborate on why secession represents a significant shift in the balance of power. It discusses how the creation of a new state leaves the host state more vulnerable to the ethnic group, generally speaking. The chapter then outlines the states' two related concerns about the external security implications of any secessionist movement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3. India’s Strategies against Separatism in Assam, Punjab, and Kashmir, 1984-1994 4. The Ottoman Empire’s Escalation from Reforms to the Armenian Genocide, 1908-1915 Conclusion: Security and Separatism in the Contemporary World 5. Peaceful and Violent Separatism in North America, Europe, and the Middle East, 1861-1993 1. An External Security Theory of Secessionist Conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1