过于轻易地剥夺权利人的基本权利和自由?低容量车辆技术协会诉布雷特案以及根据《1990年新西兰权利法案》发出的弃权

Rosa Laugesen
{"title":"过于轻易地剥夺权利人的基本权利和自由?低容量车辆技术协会诉布雷特案以及根据《1990年新西兰权利法案》发出的弃权","authors":"Rosa Laugesen","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v51i1.6519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Low Volume Vehicle Technical Association Inc v Brett, the New Zealand Court of Appeal grappled with the rare issue of whether a person can waive their right to freedom of expression under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZBORA). The Court, responding in the affirmative, concluded that Mr Brett had waived this right. This article critiques that decision. While the Court was right to find that Mr Brett could waive his right to freedom of expression, it failed to scrutinise the waiver to ensure that this relinquishment of a protected right in fact reflected Mr Brett's free choice. Had the Court considered a different approach to analysing Mr Brett's waiver – at the prima facie breach stage, instead of under s 5 of the NZBORA – proper scrutiny would have been achieved. That approach would have ensured that Mr Brett was not so easily deprived of his right.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depriving Right-Holders of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms Too Easily? Low Volume Vehicle Technical Association Inc v Brett and the Issue of Waiver under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990\",\"authors\":\"Rosa Laugesen\",\"doi\":\"10.26686/vuwlr.v51i1.6519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Low Volume Vehicle Technical Association Inc v Brett, the New Zealand Court of Appeal grappled with the rare issue of whether a person can waive their right to freedom of expression under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZBORA). The Court, responding in the affirmative, concluded that Mr Brett had waived this right. This article critiques that decision. While the Court was right to find that Mr Brett could waive his right to freedom of expression, it failed to scrutinise the waiver to ensure that this relinquishment of a protected right in fact reflected Mr Brett's free choice. Had the Court considered a different approach to analysing Mr Brett's waiver – at the prima facie breach stage, instead of under s 5 of the NZBORA – proper scrutiny would have been achieved. That approach would have ensured that Mr Brett was not so easily deprived of his right.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v51i1.6519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v51i1.6519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在Low Volume Vehicle Technical Association Inc .诉Brett一案中,新西兰上诉法院处理了一个罕见的问题,即一个人是否可以根据《1990年新西兰权利法案》(NZBORA)放弃其言论自由权。法院的答复是肯定的,结论是布雷特先生放弃了这项权利。本文批评了这一决定。虽然法院认定布雷特先生可以放弃他的言论自由权是正确的,但它未能仔细审查这种放弃,以确保这种放弃受保护的权利实际上反映了布雷特先生的自由选择。如果法院考虑一种不同的方法来分析布雷特的豁免——在表面违约阶段,而不是在NZBORA第5条之下——就可以进行适当的审查。这种做法将确保布雷特的权利不会轻易被剥夺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Depriving Right-Holders of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms Too Easily? Low Volume Vehicle Technical Association Inc v Brett and the Issue of Waiver under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990
In Low Volume Vehicle Technical Association Inc v Brett, the New Zealand Court of Appeal grappled with the rare issue of whether a person can waive their right to freedom of expression under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZBORA). The Court, responding in the affirmative, concluded that Mr Brett had waived this right. This article critiques that decision. While the Court was right to find that Mr Brett could waive his right to freedom of expression, it failed to scrutinise the waiver to ensure that this relinquishment of a protected right in fact reflected Mr Brett's free choice. Had the Court considered a different approach to analysing Mr Brett's waiver – at the prima facie breach stage, instead of under s 5 of the NZBORA – proper scrutiny would have been achieved. That approach would have ensured that Mr Brett was not so easily deprived of his right.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La garantía legal del Estatuto del Consumidor como mecanismo para proteger al comprador frente a vicios inmobiliarios progresivos (The Legal Guarantee of the Consumers Statute as a Mechanism to Protect Buyer Front of Progressive Real Estate Vices) Solidarismo y contratos relacionales: alternativas frente a la pandemia de covid-19 (Contractual Solidarism and Relational Contract Theory: Alternative Approaches to Contract Law in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic) Error Correction Mechanisms for Transactional Script Smart Contracts The Shadows of Litigation Finance Malas leyes (Bad Law)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1