《设计规则》第2卷:第10章——关于大规模生产主题的变化

Carliss Y. Baldwin
{"title":"《设计规则》第2卷:第10章——关于大规模生产主题的变化","authors":"Carliss Y. Baldwin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3717875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this chapter is to explore variation among organizations employing mass production technology. To allow for an apples-to-apples comparison, I examine organizations using essentially the same technologies, making similar products, and competing in the same markets. Specifically, I look at the organizational differences among the largest automakers in the U.S. and Japan. <br><br>I focus first on Ford from 1910 to 1930, then General Motors from the 1920s through the 1960s, then Toyota (and other Japanese automakers) from the 1960s through 2000. The differences between these organizations indicate that, while technology shapes organizations within broad limits, it does not determine an organization’s complete design or its long-term competitive success or failure.","PeriodicalId":230377,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Integration (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design Rules, Volume 2: Chapter 10—Variations on the Theme of Mass Production\",\"authors\":\"Carliss Y. Baldwin\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3717875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this chapter is to explore variation among organizations employing mass production technology. To allow for an apples-to-apples comparison, I examine organizations using essentially the same technologies, making similar products, and competing in the same markets. Specifically, I look at the organizational differences among the largest automakers in the U.S. and Japan. <br><br>I focus first on Ford from 1910 to 1930, then General Motors from the 1920s through the 1960s, then Toyota (and other Japanese automakers) from the 1960s through 2000. The differences between these organizations indicate that, while technology shapes organizations within broad limits, it does not determine an organization’s complete design or its long-term competitive success or failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":230377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Integration (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Integration (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3717875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Integration (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3717875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章的目的是探讨采用大规模生产技术的组织之间的差异。为了进行同类比较,我考察了使用基本相同技术、生产类似产品并在相同市场竞争的组织。具体来说,我研究了美国和日本最大的汽车制造商之间的组织差异。我首先关注1910年到1930年的福特,然后是20世纪20年代到60年代的通用汽车,然后是60年代到2000年的丰田(和其他日本汽车制造商)。这些组织之间的差异表明,虽然技术在广泛的范围内塑造了组织,但它并不能决定组织的完整设计或其长期竞争的成功或失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design Rules, Volume 2: Chapter 10—Variations on the Theme of Mass Production
The purpose of this chapter is to explore variation among organizations employing mass production technology. To allow for an apples-to-apples comparison, I examine organizations using essentially the same technologies, making similar products, and competing in the same markets. Specifically, I look at the organizational differences among the largest automakers in the U.S. and Japan.

I focus first on Ford from 1910 to 1930, then General Motors from the 1920s through the 1960s, then Toyota (and other Japanese automakers) from the 1960s through 2000. The differences between these organizations indicate that, while technology shapes organizations within broad limits, it does not determine an organization’s complete design or its long-term competitive success or failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mergers and Labor Market Outcomes in the US Airline Industry Design Rules, Volume 2: Chapter 10—Variations on the Theme of Mass Production Regulatory Risk, Vertical Integration, and Upstream Investment Vertical Integration under an Optimal Tax Policy: A Consumer Surplus Detrimental Result Firm Organization in the Digital Age: IT Use and Vertical Transactions in U.S. Manufacturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1