AIA 500指数扩展:专利货币化实体的影响

Robin C. Feldman, Thomas Ewing, Sara Jeruss
{"title":"AIA 500指数扩展:专利货币化实体的影响","authors":"Robin C. Feldman, Thomas Ewing, Sara Jeruss","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2247195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public attention is increasingly focused on patent monetization entities. Known colloquially as “patent trolls,” these entities derive income from licensing or litigating, rather than producing a product. To understand the impact of these entities, we examined all patent litigations filed across four years, 2007-2008 and 2011-2012. This involved analyzing almost 13,000 cases and almost 30,000 patents asserted. Most striking, as of 2012, litigation by patent monetization entities now represents a majority of the patent litigations filed in the United States. In fact, 58.7% of all patent lawsuits were filed by monetizers. This is a sharp rise from 2007, when monetizers filed only 24.6%. In addition, of the parties who filed the greatest number of patent litigations in the years we studied, all 10 are monetizers.We also examined the age and transfer patterns of the patents asserted. Among other findings, we saw that the newest patents issued are the ones most frequently litigated. This could suggest that people are increasingly applying for patents with the intent of filing lawsuits, rather than making products.Our analysis also revealed a problem previously unrecognized. Mechanisms for notifying the public when patents have been asserted in lawsuits are woefully inadequate. Current mechanisms did not operate 2/3 of the time. The study also found indications of stealth behavior, as well as a market for purchasing patents after they expire.","PeriodicalId":117505,"journal":{"name":"UC Hastings College of the Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The AIA 500 Expanded: The Effects of Patent Monetization Entities\",\"authors\":\"Robin C. Feldman, Thomas Ewing, Sara Jeruss\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2247195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public attention is increasingly focused on patent monetization entities. Known colloquially as “patent trolls,” these entities derive income from licensing or litigating, rather than producing a product. To understand the impact of these entities, we examined all patent litigations filed across four years, 2007-2008 and 2011-2012. This involved analyzing almost 13,000 cases and almost 30,000 patents asserted. Most striking, as of 2012, litigation by patent monetization entities now represents a majority of the patent litigations filed in the United States. In fact, 58.7% of all patent lawsuits were filed by monetizers. This is a sharp rise from 2007, when monetizers filed only 24.6%. In addition, of the parties who filed the greatest number of patent litigations in the years we studied, all 10 are monetizers.We also examined the age and transfer patterns of the patents asserted. Among other findings, we saw that the newest patents issued are the ones most frequently litigated. This could suggest that people are increasingly applying for patents with the intent of filing lawsuits, rather than making products.Our analysis also revealed a problem previously unrecognized. Mechanisms for notifying the public when patents have been asserted in lawsuits are woefully inadequate. Current mechanisms did not operate 2/3 of the time. The study also found indications of stealth behavior, as well as a market for purchasing patents after they expire.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UC Hastings College of the Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UC Hastings College of the Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2247195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UC Hastings College of the Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2247195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

公众的注意力越来越集中在专利货币化实体上。这些实体通常被称为“专利流氓”,它们的收入来自授权或诉讼,而不是生产产品。为了了解这些实体的影响,我们研究了2007-2008年和2011-2012年这四年的所有专利诉讼。这涉及分析近13,000个案例和近30,000项专利。最引人注目的是,截至2012年,专利货币化实体提起的诉讼占美国专利诉讼的大部分。事实上,58.7%的专利诉讼是由盈利者提起的。与2007年相比,这一比例大幅上升,当时盈利公司提交的申请仅为24.6%。此外,在我们研究的年份里,提交最多专利诉讼的当事人中,所有10家都是货币者。我们还检查了所主张的专利的年龄和转让模式。在其他发现中,我们发现最新发布的专利是最常被提起诉讼的专利。这可能表明,越来越多的人申请专利的目的是提起诉讼,而不是制造产品。我们的分析还揭示了一个以前未被认识到的问题。当专利在诉讼中被主张时,通知公众的机制严重不足。目前的机制有2/3的时间无法运行。该研究还发现了隐形行为的迹象,以及专利到期后购买专利的市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The AIA 500 Expanded: The Effects of Patent Monetization Entities
Public attention is increasingly focused on patent monetization entities. Known colloquially as “patent trolls,” these entities derive income from licensing or litigating, rather than producing a product. To understand the impact of these entities, we examined all patent litigations filed across four years, 2007-2008 and 2011-2012. This involved analyzing almost 13,000 cases and almost 30,000 patents asserted. Most striking, as of 2012, litigation by patent monetization entities now represents a majority of the patent litigations filed in the United States. In fact, 58.7% of all patent lawsuits were filed by monetizers. This is a sharp rise from 2007, when monetizers filed only 24.6%. In addition, of the parties who filed the greatest number of patent litigations in the years we studied, all 10 are monetizers.We also examined the age and transfer patterns of the patents asserted. Among other findings, we saw that the newest patents issued are the ones most frequently litigated. This could suggest that people are increasingly applying for patents with the intent of filing lawsuits, rather than making products.Our analysis also revealed a problem previously unrecognized. Mechanisms for notifying the public when patents have been asserted in lawsuits are woefully inadequate. Current mechanisms did not operate 2/3 of the time. The study also found indications of stealth behavior, as well as a market for purchasing patents after they expire.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empirical Evidence of Drug Companies Using Citizen Petitions to Hold Off Competition Environmental Democracy and Forest Carbon (REDD+) Rethinking Patent Eligibility for the Modern Scientific Age The AIA 500 Expanded: The Effects of Patent Monetization Entities Clarifying Costs: Can Increased Price Transparency Reduce Healthcare Spending?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1