{"title":"如果阿维德·帕尔多没有发表他的著名演讲会怎样?","authors":"S. Ranganathan","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192898036.003.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores whether and what might have changed had one famous speech not been made. The speech in question was Arvid Pardo’s November 1967 address to the First Committee of the UN General Assembly. Through the lens of tracking Pardo’s contribution which is both over- and understated in the literature, the chapter discusses why in the 1960s and after, states, international lawyers, and even civil society organisations became and have remained invested in the unlikely project of deep seabed mining. By retrieving the contingencies of the moment in which the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea was drafted and its provisions and concepts given fixed associations, the chapter argues for radical readings that might be truer to that treaty’s constitutional promise.","PeriodicalId":342974,"journal":{"name":"Contingency in International Law","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What If Arvid Pardo Had Not Made his Famous Speech?\",\"authors\":\"S. Ranganathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780192898036.003.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter explores whether and what might have changed had one famous speech not been made. The speech in question was Arvid Pardo’s November 1967 address to the First Committee of the UN General Assembly. Through the lens of tracking Pardo’s contribution which is both over- and understated in the literature, the chapter discusses why in the 1960s and after, states, international lawyers, and even civil society organisations became and have remained invested in the unlikely project of deep seabed mining. By retrieving the contingencies of the moment in which the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea was drafted and its provisions and concepts given fixed associations, the chapter argues for radical readings that might be truer to that treaty’s constitutional promise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contingency in International Law\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contingency in International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898036.003.0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contingency in International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898036.003.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本章探讨如果没有发表一篇著名的演讲,情况是否会发生变化,情况可能会发生什么变化。这是1967年11月阿维德·帕尔多在联合国大会第一委员会上的讲话。通过追踪Pardo在文献中被夸大和低估的贡献,本章讨论了为什么在20世纪60年代及之后,国家,国际律师,甚至民间社会组织开始并一直投资于深海海底采矿这个不太可能的项目。通过回顾《联合国海洋法公约》(UN Convention on the Law of the Sea)起草、其条款和概念被赋予固定关联的时刻的偶然性,本章提出了可能更符合该条约宪法承诺的激进解读。
What If Arvid Pardo Had Not Made his Famous Speech?
This chapter explores whether and what might have changed had one famous speech not been made. The speech in question was Arvid Pardo’s November 1967 address to the First Committee of the UN General Assembly. Through the lens of tracking Pardo’s contribution which is both over- and understated in the literature, the chapter discusses why in the 1960s and after, states, international lawyers, and even civil society organisations became and have remained invested in the unlikely project of deep seabed mining. By retrieving the contingencies of the moment in which the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea was drafted and its provisions and concepts given fixed associations, the chapter argues for radical readings that might be truer to that treaty’s constitutional promise.