{"title":"UNIPEN数据库中不同孤立字符识别结果比较的方法、报告和调查","authors":"E. Ratzlaff","doi":"10.1109/ICDAR.2003.1227737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A framework of data organization methods and corresponding recognition results for UNIPEN databases is presented to enable the comparison of recognition results from different isolated character recognizers. A reproducible method for splitting the Train-R01/V07 data into an array of multi-writer and omni-writer training and testing pairs is proposed. Recognition results and uncertainties are provided for each pair, as well as results for the DevTest-R01/V02 character subsets, using an online scanning n-tuple recognizer. Several other published results are surveyed within this context. In sum, this report provides the reader multiple points of reference useful for comparing a number of published recognition results and a proposed framework that similarly allows private evaluation of unpublished recognition results.","PeriodicalId":249193,"journal":{"name":"Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods, reports and survey for the comparison of diverse isolated character recognition results on the UNIPEN database\",\"authors\":\"E. Ratzlaff\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDAR.2003.1227737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A framework of data organization methods and corresponding recognition results for UNIPEN databases is presented to enable the comparison of recognition results from different isolated character recognizers. A reproducible method for splitting the Train-R01/V07 data into an array of multi-writer and omni-writer training and testing pairs is proposed. Recognition results and uncertainties are provided for each pair, as well as results for the DevTest-R01/V02 character subsets, using an online scanning n-tuple recognizer. Several other published results are surveyed within this context. In sum, this report provides the reader multiple points of reference useful for comparing a number of published recognition results and a proposed framework that similarly allows private evaluation of unpublished recognition results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2003.1227737\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2003.1227737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Methods, reports and survey for the comparison of diverse isolated character recognition results on the UNIPEN database
A framework of data organization methods and corresponding recognition results for UNIPEN databases is presented to enable the comparison of recognition results from different isolated character recognizers. A reproducible method for splitting the Train-R01/V07 data into an array of multi-writer and omni-writer training and testing pairs is proposed. Recognition results and uncertainties are provided for each pair, as well as results for the DevTest-R01/V02 character subsets, using an online scanning n-tuple recognizer. Several other published results are surveyed within this context. In sum, this report provides the reader multiple points of reference useful for comparing a number of published recognition results and a proposed framework that similarly allows private evaluation of unpublished recognition results.