限制用户同意的数据共享和面部识别数据的收集:系统分析

W. Gies, James F. Overby, Nick Saraceno, Jordan Frome, Emily York, A. Salman
{"title":"限制用户同意的数据共享和面部识别数据的收集:系统分析","authors":"W. Gies, James F. Overby, Nick Saraceno, Jordan Frome, Emily York, A. Salman","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mass Data Collection through Facial Recognition Technology poses a threat to the personal privacy of millions, with big data companies selling and analyzing user data points without appropriate consent and having unrestricted access to said data. Personal privacy should be a right that requires protection in our interconnected society that is becoming ever more reliant on technology. We believe that as this technology progresses without proper restriction, its implementation will effectively eliminate personal privacy, effectively placing a constraint on user autonomy. This is due in part to the vagueness of current policies centered around privacy. If this does not change, personal privacy could be eliminated. FRT has many features, some of which are controversial and impede its effectiveness. Through a systems analysis approach that examines the integration of the social and technical dimensions of these privacy problems, our preliminary research examines several approaches that will be most effective in addressing this complex problem while supporting FRT development. By proposing the following solutions, we hope to prevent personal privacy infringement via FRT: Propose and pass policy similar to the Commercial Facial Recognition Privacy Act, improve data encryption for databases with sensitive personal information (such as Facial Recognition data), and change the way privacy policy is delivered to the consumer by setting maximum length standards on the policy that is written and using less legal jargon to promote the reading and understanding of these privacy policies and what they require of the user. Based on analysis of these proposed solutions, we believe that there will be an increase in security and the feeling of personal privacy across the board.","PeriodicalId":331495,"journal":{"name":"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restricting Data Sharing and Collection of Facial Recognition Data by the Consent of the User: A Systems Analysis\",\"authors\":\"W. Gies, James F. Overby, Nick Saraceno, Jordan Frome, Emily York, A. Salman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mass Data Collection through Facial Recognition Technology poses a threat to the personal privacy of millions, with big data companies selling and analyzing user data points without appropriate consent and having unrestricted access to said data. Personal privacy should be a right that requires protection in our interconnected society that is becoming ever more reliant on technology. We believe that as this technology progresses without proper restriction, its implementation will effectively eliminate personal privacy, effectively placing a constraint on user autonomy. This is due in part to the vagueness of current policies centered around privacy. If this does not change, personal privacy could be eliminated. FRT has many features, some of which are controversial and impede its effectiveness. Through a systems analysis approach that examines the integration of the social and technical dimensions of these privacy problems, our preliminary research examines several approaches that will be most effective in addressing this complex problem while supporting FRT development. By proposing the following solutions, we hope to prevent personal privacy infringement via FRT: Propose and pass policy similar to the Commercial Facial Recognition Privacy Act, improve data encryption for databases with sensitive personal information (such as Facial Recognition data), and change the way privacy policy is delivered to the consumer by setting maximum length standards on the policy that is written and using less legal jargon to promote the reading and understanding of these privacy policies and what they require of the user. Based on analysis of these proposed solutions, we believe that there will be an increase in security and the feeling of personal privacy across the board.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

通过面部识别技术收集大量数据对数百万人的个人隐私构成了威胁,大数据公司在未经适当同意的情况下出售和分析用户数据点,并无限制地访问所述数据。在我们这个越来越依赖科技的互联社会中,个人隐私应该是一项需要保护的权利。我们认为,如果这项技术的发展没有适当的限制,它的实施将有效地消除个人隐私,有效地约束用户的自主权。这在一定程度上是由于当前以隐私为中心的政策模糊不清。如果这种情况不改变,个人隐私可能会被消除。FRT有许多特点,其中一些是有争议的,阻碍了它的有效性。通过一种系统分析方法,考察这些隐私问题的社会和技术层面的整合,我们的初步研究考察了几种在支持FRT发展的同时最有效地解决这一复杂问题的方法。我们希望通过以下解决方案来防止FRT对个人隐私的侵犯:提出并通过类似于《商业面部识别隐私法》的政策,改进敏感个人信息(如面部识别数据)数据库的数据加密,改变隐私政策向消费者传递的方式,为政策制定最大长度标准,减少法律术语的使用,以促进对这些隐私政策及其对用户的要求的阅读和理解。基于对这些建议的解决方案的分析,我们相信,安全性和个人隐私的感觉将全面提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Restricting Data Sharing and Collection of Facial Recognition Data by the Consent of the User: A Systems Analysis
Mass Data Collection through Facial Recognition Technology poses a threat to the personal privacy of millions, with big data companies selling and analyzing user data points without appropriate consent and having unrestricted access to said data. Personal privacy should be a right that requires protection in our interconnected society that is becoming ever more reliant on technology. We believe that as this technology progresses without proper restriction, its implementation will effectively eliminate personal privacy, effectively placing a constraint on user autonomy. This is due in part to the vagueness of current policies centered around privacy. If this does not change, personal privacy could be eliminated. FRT has many features, some of which are controversial and impede its effectiveness. Through a systems analysis approach that examines the integration of the social and technical dimensions of these privacy problems, our preliminary research examines several approaches that will be most effective in addressing this complex problem while supporting FRT development. By proposing the following solutions, we hope to prevent personal privacy infringement via FRT: Propose and pass policy similar to the Commercial Facial Recognition Privacy Act, improve data encryption for databases with sensitive personal information (such as Facial Recognition data), and change the way privacy policy is delivered to the consumer by setting maximum length standards on the policy that is written and using less legal jargon to promote the reading and understanding of these privacy policies and what they require of the user. Based on analysis of these proposed solutions, we believe that there will be an increase in security and the feeling of personal privacy across the board.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring Automation Bias and Complacency in an X-Ray Screening Task Criminal Consistency and Distinctiveness Evaluating and Improving Attrition Models for the Retail Banking Industry SIEDS 2020 TOC Automated Rotor Assembly CNC Machine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1