{"title":"传统的红狐陷阱的效果和选择性如何?","authors":"J. Duarte, M. A. Farfán, J. Fa, Mario Vargas","doi":"10.7325/GALEMYS.2012.A01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We followed a red fox culling campaign that employed traditional cable snares to control numbers in a hunting estate in the Serranía de Ronda (Andalusia, southern Spain). We assessed abundance and presence of carnivore species within the area where fox culling took place by means of faecal counts within regularly walked paths. Twenty animals of four different taxa were snared during 238 nights in 36 locations. Through interviews with informed locals we established there were eight carnivore species present in the study area. Capture efficiency was 1.52 foxes per 1,000 trap-nights; the ISO-selectivity was 65% and the negative specific selectivity 50%. Despite daily checks of snares, there was a very high mortality (>80%) of target and non-target species. Moreover, a large proportion of the animals were caught by the neck. Our results suggest that this traditional method (snares without stops) of predator control should not be used.","PeriodicalId":143015,"journal":{"name":"Galemys, Spanish Journal of Mammalogy","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How effective and selective is traditional Red Fox snaring?\",\"authors\":\"J. Duarte, M. A. Farfán, J. Fa, Mario Vargas\",\"doi\":\"10.7325/GALEMYS.2012.A01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We followed a red fox culling campaign that employed traditional cable snares to control numbers in a hunting estate in the Serranía de Ronda (Andalusia, southern Spain). We assessed abundance and presence of carnivore species within the area where fox culling took place by means of faecal counts within regularly walked paths. Twenty animals of four different taxa were snared during 238 nights in 36 locations. Through interviews with informed locals we established there were eight carnivore species present in the study area. Capture efficiency was 1.52 foxes per 1,000 trap-nights; the ISO-selectivity was 65% and the negative specific selectivity 50%. Despite daily checks of snares, there was a very high mortality (>80%) of target and non-target species. Moreover, a large proportion of the animals were caught by the neck. Our results suggest that this traditional method (snares without stops) of predator control should not be used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Galemys, Spanish Journal of Mammalogy\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Galemys, Spanish Journal of Mammalogy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7325/GALEMYS.2012.A01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Galemys, Spanish Journal of Mammalogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7325/GALEMYS.2012.A01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
我们跟踪了在Serranía de Ronda(安达卢西亚,西班牙南部)的一个狩猎庄园进行的红狐扑杀活动,该活动采用传统的电缆陷阱来控制数量。我们通过定期步行路径内的粪便计数,评估了在进行狐狸扑杀的区域内食肉动物物种的丰度和存在性。在36个地点的238个夜晚,共捕获了4个不同分类群的20只动物。通过对当地知情人士的采访,我们确定在研究区域有8种食肉动物。捕获效率为每1000个陷阱夜捕获1.52只狐狸;iso选择性为65%,负比选择性为50%。尽管每天检查陷阱,但目标和非目标物种的死亡率非常高(>80%)。此外,很大一部分动物被扼住了脖子。我们的研究结果表明,这种传统的捕食者控制方法(不停止陷阱)不应该使用。
How effective and selective is traditional Red Fox snaring?
We followed a red fox culling campaign that employed traditional cable snares to control numbers in a hunting estate in the Serranía de Ronda (Andalusia, southern Spain). We assessed abundance and presence of carnivore species within the area where fox culling took place by means of faecal counts within regularly walked paths. Twenty animals of four different taxa were snared during 238 nights in 36 locations. Through interviews with informed locals we established there were eight carnivore species present in the study area. Capture efficiency was 1.52 foxes per 1,000 trap-nights; the ISO-selectivity was 65% and the negative specific selectivity 50%. Despite daily checks of snares, there was a very high mortality (>80%) of target and non-target species. Moreover, a large proportion of the animals were caught by the neck. Our results suggest that this traditional method (snares without stops) of predator control should not be used.