在可篡改日志中查找证据

Daniel Sandler, Kyle Derr, Scott A. Crosby, D. Wallach
{"title":"在可篡改日志中查找证据","authors":"Daniel Sandler, Kyle Derr, Scott A. Crosby, D. Wallach","doi":"10.1109/SADFE.2008.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Secure logs are powerful tools for building systems that must resist forgery, prove temporal relationships, and stand up to forensic scrutiny. The proofs of order and integrity encoded in these tamper-evident chronological records, typically built using hash chaining, may be used by applications to enforce operating constraints or sound alarms at suspicious activity. However, existing research stops short of discussing how one might go about automatically determining whether a given secure log satisfies a given set of constraints on its records. In this paper, we discuss our work on Querifier, a tool that accomplishes this. It can be used offline as an analyzer for static logs, or online during the runtime of a logging application. Querifier rules are written in a flexible pattern-matching language that adapts to arbitrary log structures; given a set of rules and available log data, Querifier presents evidence of correctness and offers counterexamples if desired. We describe Querfier's implementation and offer early performance results.","PeriodicalId":391486,"journal":{"name":"2008 Third International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding the Evidence in Tamper-Evident Logs\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Sandler, Kyle Derr, Scott A. Crosby, D. Wallach\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SADFE.2008.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Secure logs are powerful tools for building systems that must resist forgery, prove temporal relationships, and stand up to forensic scrutiny. The proofs of order and integrity encoded in these tamper-evident chronological records, typically built using hash chaining, may be used by applications to enforce operating constraints or sound alarms at suspicious activity. However, existing research stops short of discussing how one might go about automatically determining whether a given secure log satisfies a given set of constraints on its records. In this paper, we discuss our work on Querifier, a tool that accomplishes this. It can be used offline as an analyzer for static logs, or online during the runtime of a logging application. Querifier rules are written in a flexible pattern-matching language that adapts to arbitrary log structures; given a set of rules and available log data, Querifier presents evidence of correctness and offers counterexamples if desired. We describe Querfier's implementation and offer early performance results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 Third International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 Third International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SADFE.2008.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Third International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SADFE.2008.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

安全日志是构建系统的强大工具,这些系统必须能够抵抗伪造、证明时间关系并经得起法医审查。在这些明显易被篡改的时间顺序记录中编码的顺序和完整性证明(通常使用散列链构建)可以被应用程序用于执行操作约束或在可疑活动时发出警报。但是,现有的研究没有讨论如何自动确定给定的安全日志是否满足其记录上的一组给定约束。在本文中,我们讨论了我们在Querifier上的工作,Querifier是一个完成此任务的工具。它可以离线用作静态日志的分析器,也可以在日志应用程序运行期间在线使用。Querifier规则是用灵活的模式匹配语言编写的,可以适应任意的日志结构;给定一组规则和可用的日志数据,Querifier提供正确性的证据,并在需要时提供反例。我们描述了Querfier的实现,并提供了早期的性能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Finding the Evidence in Tamper-Evident Logs
Secure logs are powerful tools for building systems that must resist forgery, prove temporal relationships, and stand up to forensic scrutiny. The proofs of order and integrity encoded in these tamper-evident chronological records, typically built using hash chaining, may be used by applications to enforce operating constraints or sound alarms at suspicious activity. However, existing research stops short of discussing how one might go about automatically determining whether a given secure log satisfies a given set of constraints on its records. In this paper, we discuss our work on Querifier, a tool that accomplishes this. It can be used offline as an analyzer for static logs, or online during the runtime of a logging application. Querifier rules are written in a flexible pattern-matching language that adapts to arbitrary log structures; given a set of rules and available log data, Querifier presents evidence of correctness and offers counterexamples if desired. We describe Querfier's implementation and offer early performance results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Research Configuration for a Digital Network Forensic Lab SÁDI - Statistical Analysis for Data Type Identification Cognitive-Maps Based Investigation of Digital Security Incidents Implications of Attorney Experiences with Digital Forensics and Electronic Evidence in the United States Exemplifying Attack Identification and Analysis in a Novel Forensically Viable Syslog Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1