多旋翼机植保产品应用设备技术参数确定

Yu. G. Vozhik, S. Maranda, P. Vitrukh
{"title":"多旋翼机植保产品应用设备技术参数确定","authors":"Yu. G. Vozhik, S. Maranda, P. Vitrukh","doi":"10.37204/0131-2189-2021-14-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Annotation\nPurpose. Improving the efficiency of field spraying and creating safe working conditions for maintenance personnel through the use of unmanned multicopters, the air jets from the propellers of which will not distort the flares of the sprayed solution of plant protection products (PPE).\nMethods. The method of analysis of variable time components of agricultural units is used.\nResults. Dependences of technical and operational indicators of technological equipment of a multicopter on this design and mode parameters and their rational values are received. Comparative data of multicopter and ground sprayers were obtained, which revealed the indisputable advantages of the former over the latter.\nConclusions\n1. One of the successful alternatives to ground sprayers is the use of unmanned aerial vehicles – multicopters, which, unlike ground vehicles, do not need to leave in the field among the plants technological tracks that reduce up to 5 % usable area and do not depend on soil and plant height. Due to the significant high working speed in comparison with ground means (from 3 m/s to 10 m/s) and practically absence of time for turns at the end of a run (3–5 s) one multicopter with width of capture of 10–12 m, can replace ground sprayer with a width of 50 m and five times the cost.\n2. The rational structural and functional scheme of the technological equipment of the multicopter for plant protection must be similar to the ground sprayers of the frame construction, on the sides of which the screws of the multicopter are installed, and between them the spraying equipment.\n3. Reducing the rate of application of PPE solution from low-volume (50 l/ha) to ultra-low-volume (10 l/ha) spraying increases productivity by only 1,3 times and significant complexity of the equipment.\n4. Reducing battery time during multicopter operation from 180 minutes to 10 minutes reduces performance by only 10 %.\n5. For low-volume spraying, a sufficient tank capacity for the PPE solution is 30 liters.\n6. To increase productivity and reduce material costs for batteries, the multicopter must be equipped with a hybrid power plant with an internal combustion engine, which will recharge the battery to drive its propellers.\n7. Increasing the capacity of the tank for the solution of PPE in ground sprayers from 3000 liters to 15000 liters is not economically feasible due to a slight (up to 10 %) increase in productivity, increased soil compaction and energy consumption.\nKeywords: agricultural multicopter, multicopter-sprayer, agricultural drone, liquid sprayers, ultra-low-volume spraying, parameters, modes.","PeriodicalId":253322,"journal":{"name":"Mehanization and electrification of agricultural","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Substantiation of technological parameters of equipment for application of plant protection products using multicopters\",\"authors\":\"Yu. G. Vozhik, S. Maranda, P. Vitrukh\",\"doi\":\"10.37204/0131-2189-2021-14-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Annotation\\nPurpose. Improving the efficiency of field spraying and creating safe working conditions for maintenance personnel through the use of unmanned multicopters, the air jets from the propellers of which will not distort the flares of the sprayed solution of plant protection products (PPE).\\nMethods. The method of analysis of variable time components of agricultural units is used.\\nResults. Dependences of technical and operational indicators of technological equipment of a multicopter on this design and mode parameters and their rational values are received. Comparative data of multicopter and ground sprayers were obtained, which revealed the indisputable advantages of the former over the latter.\\nConclusions\\n1. One of the successful alternatives to ground sprayers is the use of unmanned aerial vehicles – multicopters, which, unlike ground vehicles, do not need to leave in the field among the plants technological tracks that reduce up to 5 % usable area and do not depend on soil and plant height. Due to the significant high working speed in comparison with ground means (from 3 m/s to 10 m/s) and practically absence of time for turns at the end of a run (3–5 s) one multicopter with width of capture of 10–12 m, can replace ground sprayer with a width of 50 m and five times the cost.\\n2. The rational structural and functional scheme of the technological equipment of the multicopter for plant protection must be similar to the ground sprayers of the frame construction, on the sides of which the screws of the multicopter are installed, and between them the spraying equipment.\\n3. Reducing the rate of application of PPE solution from low-volume (50 l/ha) to ultra-low-volume (10 l/ha) spraying increases productivity by only 1,3 times and significant complexity of the equipment.\\n4. Reducing battery time during multicopter operation from 180 minutes to 10 minutes reduces performance by only 10 %.\\n5. For low-volume spraying, a sufficient tank capacity for the PPE solution is 30 liters.\\n6. To increase productivity and reduce material costs for batteries, the multicopter must be equipped with a hybrid power plant with an internal combustion engine, which will recharge the battery to drive its propellers.\\n7. Increasing the capacity of the tank for the solution of PPE in ground sprayers from 3000 liters to 15000 liters is not economically feasible due to a slight (up to 10 %) increase in productivity, increased soil compaction and energy consumption.\\nKeywords: agricultural multicopter, multicopter-sprayer, agricultural drone, liquid sprayers, ultra-low-volume spraying, parameters, modes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mehanization and electrification of agricultural\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mehanization and electrification of agricultural\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37204/0131-2189-2021-14-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mehanization and electrification of agricultural","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37204/0131-2189-2021-14-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

AnnotationPurpose。通过使用无人驾驶多旋翼飞机,提高现场喷洒效率,为维修人员创造安全的工作条件,其螺旋桨产生的气流不会扭曲植保产品(PPE)喷洒溶液的耀斑。采用了农业单位变时成分分析方法。得到了多旋翼机工艺装备的技术指标和运行指标对该设计的依赖关系和模式参数及其合理值。通过与地面喷雾器的比较,得出了多直升机喷雾器相对于地面喷雾器无可争辩的优势。地面喷雾器的成功替代品之一是使用无人驾驶飞行器——多直升机,与地面车辆不同,它不需要在植物之间留下可减少高达5%可用面积的技术轨迹,也不依赖于土壤和植物高度。由于与地面手段相比工作速度显着高(从3米/秒到10米/秒),并且在运行结束时几乎没有转弯时间(3 - 5秒),一架捕获宽度为10 - 12米的多旋翼直升机可以取代宽度为50米的地面喷雾器,成本是地面喷雾器的5倍。2 .植保用多旋翼机工艺设备的合理结构和功能方案必须类似于框架结构的地面喷雾器,其两侧安装多旋翼机螺钉,其之间安装喷涂设备。将PPE溶液的应用速率从低容量(50升/公顷)减少到超低容量(10升/公顷)喷涂,只提高了1.3倍的生产率,并显著增加了设备的复杂性。在多架直升机操作期间,将电池时间从180分钟减少到10分钟,只会降低10%的性能。对于小容量喷涂,PPE溶液的足够容量为30升。为了提高生产力和降低电池的材料成本,多旋翼飞机必须配备一个带有内燃机的混合动力装置,它将给电池充电以驱动螺旋桨。将地面喷雾器中PPE溶液的储罐容量从3000升增加到15000升在经济上是不可行的,因为生产力会轻微(高达10%)增加,土壤压实和能源消耗也会增加。关键词:农用多旋翼机,多旋翼喷雾器,农用无人机,液体喷雾器,超低体积喷雾器,参数,模式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Substantiation of technological parameters of equipment for application of plant protection products using multicopters
Annotation Purpose. Improving the efficiency of field spraying and creating safe working conditions for maintenance personnel through the use of unmanned multicopters, the air jets from the propellers of which will not distort the flares of the sprayed solution of plant protection products (PPE). Methods. The method of analysis of variable time components of agricultural units is used. Results. Dependences of technical and operational indicators of technological equipment of a multicopter on this design and mode parameters and their rational values are received. Comparative data of multicopter and ground sprayers were obtained, which revealed the indisputable advantages of the former over the latter. Conclusions 1. One of the successful alternatives to ground sprayers is the use of unmanned aerial vehicles – multicopters, which, unlike ground vehicles, do not need to leave in the field among the plants technological tracks that reduce up to 5 % usable area and do not depend on soil and plant height. Due to the significant high working speed in comparison with ground means (from 3 m/s to 10 m/s) and practically absence of time for turns at the end of a run (3–5 s) one multicopter with width of capture of 10–12 m, can replace ground sprayer with a width of 50 m and five times the cost. 2. The rational structural and functional scheme of the technological equipment of the multicopter for plant protection must be similar to the ground sprayers of the frame construction, on the sides of which the screws of the multicopter are installed, and between them the spraying equipment. 3. Reducing the rate of application of PPE solution from low-volume (50 l/ha) to ultra-low-volume (10 l/ha) spraying increases productivity by only 1,3 times and significant complexity of the equipment. 4. Reducing battery time during multicopter operation from 180 minutes to 10 minutes reduces performance by only 10 %. 5. For low-volume spraying, a sufficient tank capacity for the PPE solution is 30 liters. 6. To increase productivity and reduce material costs for batteries, the multicopter must be equipped with a hybrid power plant with an internal combustion engine, which will recharge the battery to drive its propellers. 7. Increasing the capacity of the tank for the solution of PPE in ground sprayers from 3000 liters to 15000 liters is not economically feasible due to a slight (up to 10 %) increase in productivity, increased soil compaction and energy consumption. Keywords: agricultural multicopter, multicopter-sprayer, agricultural drone, liquid sprayers, ultra-low-volume spraying, parameters, modes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
https://journal.imesg.gov.ua Substantiation of the structural-functional scheme and performance of a rotary treater of periodic action for layer-by-layer seed treatment Methods of experimental studies of the process of drying bird droppings in a drum dryer Theoretical study of uniform motion of the harrowing section for steam treatment To the mathematical model of the process of contact heating of seeds in vacuum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1