使用注释从现有文档开发验收测试:实验

David Connolly, Frank Keenan, F. McCaffery
{"title":"使用注释从现有文档开发验收测试:实验","authors":"David Connolly, Frank Keenan, F. McCaffery","doi":"10.1109/IWAST.2009.5069050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of good software testing is often reported. Traditionally, acceptance testing is the last stage of the testing process before release to the customer. Unfortunately, it is not always appropriate to wait so long for customer feedback. Emerging agile methods recognise this and promote close interaction between the customer and developers for early acceptance testing, often before implementation commences. Indeed, Acceptance Test Driven Development (ATDD) is a process that uses customer interaction to define tests and tool support to automate and execute these. However, with existing tools, tests are usually written from new descriptions or rewritten from existing documentation. Here, the challenge is to allow developers and customers to annotate existing documentation and automatically generate acceptance tests without rewrites or new descriptions. This paper introduces the related ideas and describes a particular experiment that assesses the value of using annotated text to create acceptance tests.","PeriodicalId":401585,"journal":{"name":"2009 ICSE Workshop on Automation of Software Test","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing acceptance tests from existing documentation using annotations: An experiment\",\"authors\":\"David Connolly, Frank Keenan, F. McCaffery\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IWAST.2009.5069050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The importance of good software testing is often reported. Traditionally, acceptance testing is the last stage of the testing process before release to the customer. Unfortunately, it is not always appropriate to wait so long for customer feedback. Emerging agile methods recognise this and promote close interaction between the customer and developers for early acceptance testing, often before implementation commences. Indeed, Acceptance Test Driven Development (ATDD) is a process that uses customer interaction to define tests and tool support to automate and execute these. However, with existing tools, tests are usually written from new descriptions or rewritten from existing documentation. Here, the challenge is to allow developers and customers to annotate existing documentation and automatically generate acceptance tests without rewrites or new descriptions. This paper introduces the related ideas and describes a particular experiment that assesses the value of using annotated text to create acceptance tests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":401585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 ICSE Workshop on Automation of Software Test\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 ICSE Workshop on Automation of Software Test\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWAST.2009.5069050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 ICSE Workshop on Automation of Software Test","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWAST.2009.5069050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

好的软件测试的重要性经常被报道。传统上,验收测试是向客户发布之前测试过程的最后一个阶段。不幸的是,等待客户反馈这么长时间并不总是合适的。新兴的敏捷方法认识到这一点,并促进客户和开发人员之间的密切互动,以便进行早期验收测试,通常在实现开始之前进行。实际上,验收测试驱动开发(ATDD)是一个使用客户交互来定义测试和工具支持来自动化和执行这些测试的过程。然而,使用现有的工具,测试通常是根据新的描述编写的,或者是从现有的文档重写的。这里的挑战是允许开发人员和客户注释现有的文档,并自动生成验收测试,而不需要重写或新的描述。本文介绍了相关的思想,并描述了一个评估使用注释文本创建验收测试的价值的特定实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing acceptance tests from existing documentation using annotations: An experiment
The importance of good software testing is often reported. Traditionally, acceptance testing is the last stage of the testing process before release to the customer. Unfortunately, it is not always appropriate to wait so long for customer feedback. Emerging agile methods recognise this and promote close interaction between the customer and developers for early acceptance testing, often before implementation commences. Indeed, Acceptance Test Driven Development (ATDD) is a process that uses customer interaction to define tests and tool support to automate and execute these. However, with existing tools, tests are usually written from new descriptions or rewritten from existing documentation. Here, the challenge is to allow developers and customers to annotate existing documentation and automatically generate acceptance tests without rewrites or new descriptions. This paper introduces the related ideas and describes a particular experiment that assesses the value of using annotated text to create acceptance tests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated testing of a converged conferencing application The compliance testing of software tools with respect to the UML standards specification - The ArgoUML case study An experimental study of methods for executing test suites in memory constrained environments Test generation strategies to measure worst-case execution time Lazy symbolic evaluation and its path constraints solution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1