利用机器学习技术对眩晕障碍清单中的良性阵发性定位性眩晕类型进行分类

Lawana Masankaran, Waraporn Viyanon, Visan Mahasittiwat
{"title":"利用机器学习技术对眩晕障碍清单中的良性阵发性定位性眩晕类型进行分类","authors":"Lawana Masankaran, Waraporn Viyanon, Visan Mahasittiwat","doi":"10.1109/ICIIBMS.2018.8550002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo (BPPV) is one of the causes of vertigo which extremely affects the daily life of patients. Different types of BPPV are treated in a different way. Physicians differentiate the BPPV types using nystagmus characteristics. However, some patients have unclear nystagmus, so their treatments are delayed due to the difficulty of diagnosis. Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) is a tool to assess the severity of dizziness before a patient is diagnosed by a physician. The use of DHI can distinguish BPPV types which can help physicians decide what treatments would be suitable for patients. This research aims to study the ability of using DHI for diferrential diagnosis of Posterior canal — Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo (PC-BPPV) and Horizontal canal — Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo (HC-BPPV) via machine learning techniques. We used feature selection techniques and feature engineering to increase the power of machine learning algorithms. Random Forest, Support vector machine, K-Nearest Neighbor and Naïve Bayes were used to develop predictive models from DHI features that have statistically significant. Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were used to evaluate the performance of each model. It reveals that F7+E23, age and P8 are the top three important features and the model using Gaussian Naïve Bayes is the best model to discriminate HC-BPPV and PC-BPPV with 73.91% accuracy, 66.67% precision, 80.00% recall and 72.73% F1-score. In conclusion, the models that were created from DHI score can predict BPPV types at a certain level, but still not very good. Physicians have to use patient�s medical history and nystagmus observation for diagnosis. In the future, if we can collect more data or features, we may reduce the overfitting problem and have a better performance model.","PeriodicalId":430326,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo Types from Dizziness Handicap Inventory using Machine Learning Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Lawana Masankaran, Waraporn Viyanon, Visan Mahasittiwat\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIIBMS.2018.8550002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo (BPPV) is one of the causes of vertigo which extremely affects the daily life of patients. Different types of BPPV are treated in a different way. Physicians differentiate the BPPV types using nystagmus characteristics. However, some patients have unclear nystagmus, so their treatments are delayed due to the difficulty of diagnosis. Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) is a tool to assess the severity of dizziness before a patient is diagnosed by a physician. The use of DHI can distinguish BPPV types which can help physicians decide what treatments would be suitable for patients. This research aims to study the ability of using DHI for diferrential diagnosis of Posterior canal — Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo (PC-BPPV) and Horizontal canal — Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo (HC-BPPV) via machine learning techniques. We used feature selection techniques and feature engineering to increase the power of machine learning algorithms. Random Forest, Support vector machine, K-Nearest Neighbor and Naïve Bayes were used to develop predictive models from DHI features that have statistically significant. Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were used to evaluate the performance of each model. It reveals that F7+E23, age and P8 are the top three important features and the model using Gaussian Naïve Bayes is the best model to discriminate HC-BPPV and PC-BPPV with 73.91% accuracy, 66.67% precision, 80.00% recall and 72.73% F1-score. In conclusion, the models that were created from DHI score can predict BPPV types at a certain level, but still not very good. Physicians have to use patient�s medical history and nystagmus observation for diagnosis. In the future, if we can collect more data or features, we may reduce the overfitting problem and have a better performance model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIIBMS.2018.8550002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIIBMS.2018.8550002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

良性阵发性定位性眩晕(BPPV)是引起眩晕的原因之一,严重影响患者的日常生活。不同类型的BPPV有不同的治疗方法。医生根据眼球震颤特征来区分BPPV的类型。但部分患者眼球震颤不明显,因诊断困难而延误治疗。头晕障碍量表(DHI)是一种在医生诊断患者之前评估头晕严重程度的工具。使用DHI可以区分BPPV类型,这可以帮助医生决定适合患者的治疗方法。本研究旨在通过机器学习技术研究DHI对后管-良性阵发性定位眩晕(PC-BPPV)和水平管-良性阵发性定位眩晕(HC-BPPV)的鉴别诊断能力。我们使用特征选择技术和特征工程来提高机器学习算法的能力。使用随机森林、支持向量机、k近邻和Naïve贝叶斯从具有统计显著性的DHI特征中开发预测模型。准确度、精密度、召回率和f1评分用于评估每个模型的性能。结果表明,F7+E23,年龄和P8是最重要的三个特征,使用高斯Naïve贝叶斯模型是区分HC-BPPV和PC-BPPV的最佳模型,准确率为73.91%,精密度为66.67%,召回率为80.00%,f1得分为72.73%。综上所述,由DHI评分建立的模型可以在一定程度上预测BPPV类型,但仍然不是很好。医生必须根据病人的病史和眼球震颤观察来诊断。在未来,如果我们能收集到更多的数据或特征,我们可能会减少过拟合问题,得到更好的性能模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Classification of Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo Types from Dizziness Handicap Inventory using Machine Learning Techniques
Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo (BPPV) is one of the causes of vertigo which extremely affects the daily life of patients. Different types of BPPV are treated in a different way. Physicians differentiate the BPPV types using nystagmus characteristics. However, some patients have unclear nystagmus, so their treatments are delayed due to the difficulty of diagnosis. Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) is a tool to assess the severity of dizziness before a patient is diagnosed by a physician. The use of DHI can distinguish BPPV types which can help physicians decide what treatments would be suitable for patients. This research aims to study the ability of using DHI for diferrential diagnosis of Posterior canal — Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo (PC-BPPV) and Horizontal canal — Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo (HC-BPPV) via machine learning techniques. We used feature selection techniques and feature engineering to increase the power of machine learning algorithms. Random Forest, Support vector machine, K-Nearest Neighbor and Naïve Bayes were used to develop predictive models from DHI features that have statistically significant. Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were used to evaluate the performance of each model. It reveals that F7+E23, age and P8 are the top three important features and the model using Gaussian Naïve Bayes is the best model to discriminate HC-BPPV and PC-BPPV with 73.91% accuracy, 66.67% precision, 80.00% recall and 72.73% F1-score. In conclusion, the models that were created from DHI score can predict BPPV types at a certain level, but still not very good. Physicians have to use patient�s medical history and nystagmus observation for diagnosis. In the future, if we can collect more data or features, we may reduce the overfitting problem and have a better performance model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neuronal Dynamic Framework of Cerebral Cortical Networks for Spontaneous Behaviors User Experience Evaluation on the Cryptocurrency Website by Trust Aspect Energy and Cost Efficient Navigation Technique for the Visually Impaired Transforming Auto-Encoder and Decoder Network for Pediatric Bone Image Segmentation using a State-of-the-art Semantic Segmentation network on Bone Radiographs Observer design of high throughput screening system based on dioid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1