{"title":"当漫画在Instagram上成为“文学沙龙”时","authors":"Nolwenn Tréhondart","doi":"10.4000/BSSG.493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital social networks represent emerging literary and artistic scenes in which writers, artists, and fans are actively involved, as are cultural institutions and industries interested in testing out narrative practices that create new forms of mediation between creators and audiences. This is the case of the digital comic Ete, co-produced by the public television network Arte and the community management company Bigger Than Fiction. The comic originally appeared on Instagram during the months of July and August of 2017 and 2018, with one or two episodes released a day.Using a socio-semiotic approach focused on processes of negotiation between technical apparatuses, cultural producer-creators, and audiences, this article will investigate forms of hybridization between logics of creation and narration that come from the world of comics and the logics of production, circulation, and reception that are specific to the Instagram platform. I combine analysis of the editorial enunciation found on Ete’s screen-pages with an empirical investigation that sheds light, first, on the production constraints and representations that governed the process of creation (drawing on two interviews with the creators of Ete) and, second, on some of the issues surrounding appropriation of the work by follower-readers, through analysis of their comments, which appear next to panels of the comic on Instagram. This analysis is complemented by the results of a questionnaire survey that yielded ninety responses.","PeriodicalId":300699,"journal":{"name":"Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Comics Become “Literary Salons” on Instagram\",\"authors\":\"Nolwenn Tréhondart\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/BSSG.493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital social networks represent emerging literary and artistic scenes in which writers, artists, and fans are actively involved, as are cultural institutions and industries interested in testing out narrative practices that create new forms of mediation between creators and audiences. This is the case of the digital comic Ete, co-produced by the public television network Arte and the community management company Bigger Than Fiction. The comic originally appeared on Instagram during the months of July and August of 2017 and 2018, with one or two episodes released a day.Using a socio-semiotic approach focused on processes of negotiation between technical apparatuses, cultural producer-creators, and audiences, this article will investigate forms of hybridization between logics of creation and narration that come from the world of comics and the logics of production, circulation, and reception that are specific to the Instagram platform. I combine analysis of the editorial enunciation found on Ete’s screen-pages with an empirical investigation that sheds light, first, on the production constraints and representations that governed the process of creation (drawing on two interviews with the creators of Ete) and, second, on some of the issues surrounding appropriation of the work by follower-readers, through analysis of their comments, which appear next to panels of the comic on Instagram. This analysis is complemented by the results of a questionnaire survey that yielded ninety responses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/BSSG.493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/BSSG.493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
数字社交网络代表了新兴的文学和艺术场景,作家、艺术家和粉丝积极参与其中,文化机构和行业也有兴趣测试叙事实践,在创作者和观众之间创造新的调解形式。公共电视网络Arte和社区管理公司Bigger Than Fiction联合制作的数字漫画《Ete》就是一个例子。该漫画最初于2017年7月和8月以及2018年在Instagram上发布,每天发布一到两集。本文将使用社会符号学方法,关注技术设备、文化生产者-创造者和观众之间的协商过程,研究来自漫画世界的创作和叙述逻辑与Instagram平台特有的生产、流通和接受逻辑之间的混合形式。我将对在《Ete》的屏幕页面上发现的社论表述的分析与一项实证调查相结合,该调查首先揭示了支配创作过程的生产约束和表现(借鉴了对《Ete》创作者的两次采访),其次,通过分析粉丝读者的评论,揭示了围绕作品被占用的一些问题,这些评论出现在Instagram上的漫画面板旁边。这一分析得到了一项问卷调查结果的补充,该调查得到了90份答复。
Digital social networks represent emerging literary and artistic scenes in which writers, artists, and fans are actively involved, as are cultural institutions and industries interested in testing out narrative practices that create new forms of mediation between creators and audiences. This is the case of the digital comic Ete, co-produced by the public television network Arte and the community management company Bigger Than Fiction. The comic originally appeared on Instagram during the months of July and August of 2017 and 2018, with one or two episodes released a day.Using a socio-semiotic approach focused on processes of negotiation between technical apparatuses, cultural producer-creators, and audiences, this article will investigate forms of hybridization between logics of creation and narration that come from the world of comics and the logics of production, circulation, and reception that are specific to the Instagram platform. I combine analysis of the editorial enunciation found on Ete’s screen-pages with an empirical investigation that sheds light, first, on the production constraints and representations that governed the process of creation (drawing on two interviews with the creators of Ete) and, second, on some of the issues surrounding appropriation of the work by follower-readers, through analysis of their comments, which appear next to panels of the comic on Instagram. This analysis is complemented by the results of a questionnaire survey that yielded ninety responses.