一门新科学?对埃德加·莫林的《La methode》(1977-1991)的批判性解读

Bosse Holmqvist
{"title":"一门新科学?对埃德加·莫林的《La methode》(1977-1991)的批判性解读","authors":"Bosse Holmqvist","doi":"10.30827/digibug.76448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"el libro es fruto. El autor, desde un enfoque contextualista, critica la ambivalencia en la que, a su juicio, incurren los planteamientos de Morin sobre la cuestión de la relación de la ciencia con los contextos sociales en que se produce y la tendencia de Morin a incurrir en el objetivismo. Relaciona esos planteamientos con el determinismo mecánico que Morin –desacertadamente– atribuye al “sociologismo” y a la sociología del conocimiento. ABSTRACT In this article the author exposes in a synthetic way the fundamental contents and the main conclusions of his book “A new science? A critical reading of Edgar Morin's 'La Méthode' \". The book, published in Swedish, has as its axis the analysis of Morin's project of a \"scienza nuova\" based on a knowledge of knowledge, as he develops it in the first four volumes of \"The Method\", which were the ones that were had been published when the author wrote the doctoral thesis from which the book is the fruit. The author, from a contextualist approach, criticizes the ambivalence in which, in his opinion, Morin's approaches incur on the question of the relationship of science with the social contexts in which it occurs and Morin's tendency to incur in the objectivism. He relates these approaches to the mechanical determinism that Morin –unwisely– attributes to “sociologism” and the sociology of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":402375,"journal":{"name":"Gazeta de Antropología","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"¿Una nueva ciencia? Una lectura crítica de ‘La Méthode’ (1977-1991) de Edgar Morin\",\"authors\":\"Bosse Holmqvist\",\"doi\":\"10.30827/digibug.76448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"el libro es fruto. El autor, desde un enfoque contextualista, critica la ambivalencia en la que, a su juicio, incurren los planteamientos de Morin sobre la cuestión de la relación de la ciencia con los contextos sociales en que se produce y la tendencia de Morin a incurrir en el objetivismo. Relaciona esos planteamientos con el determinismo mecánico que Morin –desacertadamente– atribuye al “sociologismo” y a la sociología del conocimiento. ABSTRACT In this article the author exposes in a synthetic way the fundamental contents and the main conclusions of his book “A new science? A critical reading of Edgar Morin's 'La Méthode' \\\". The book, published in Swedish, has as its axis the analysis of Morin's project of a \\\"scienza nuova\\\" based on a knowledge of knowledge, as he develops it in the first four volumes of \\\"The Method\\\", which were the ones that were had been published when the author wrote the doctoral thesis from which the book is the fruit. The author, from a contextualist approach, criticizes the ambivalence in which, in his opinion, Morin's approaches incur on the question of the relationship of science with the social contexts in which it occurs and Morin's tendency to incur in the objectivism. He relates these approaches to the mechanical determinism that Morin –unwisely– attributes to “sociologism” and the sociology of knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gazeta de Antropología\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gazeta de Antropología\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30827/digibug.76448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gazeta de Antropología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30827/digibug.76448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

书是果实。作者从语境主义的角度,批评了莫林关于科学与它所发生的社会环境的关系问题的方法所产生的矛盾心理,以及莫林倾向于客观主义。他将这些方法与机械决定论联系起来,莫林错误地将机械决定论归因于“社会学”和知识社会学。ABSTRACT In this条提交人exposes In a合成方式的基本内容和主要结论of book”新科学吗?= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,该镇的土地面积为。The book, axis published in瑞典,你as its The analysis of Morin’s project of scienza nuova”based on a knowledge of knowledge,共有develops it in The first four volumes of The Method, which The ones that是其博士published当提交人写thesis from which The book is The水果。作者从一种语境主义的方法中批评了莫林的矛盾心理,在他看来,莫林的方法在科学与社会语境的关系问题上产生了矛盾心理,莫林倾向于在客观主义中产生矛盾心理。我relates这些approaches to the mechanical determinism that Morin—unwisely”—attributes sociologism”and the sociology of knowledge。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
¿Una nueva ciencia? Una lectura crítica de ‘La Méthode’ (1977-1991) de Edgar Morin
el libro es fruto. El autor, desde un enfoque contextualista, critica la ambivalencia en la que, a su juicio, incurren los planteamientos de Morin sobre la cuestión de la relación de la ciencia con los contextos sociales en que se produce y la tendencia de Morin a incurrir en el objetivismo. Relaciona esos planteamientos con el determinismo mecánico que Morin –desacertadamente– atribuye al “sociologismo” y a la sociología del conocimiento. ABSTRACT In this article the author exposes in a synthetic way the fundamental contents and the main conclusions of his book “A new science? A critical reading of Edgar Morin's 'La Méthode' ". The book, published in Swedish, has as its axis the analysis of Morin's project of a "scienza nuova" based on a knowledge of knowledge, as he develops it in the first four volumes of "The Method", which were the ones that were had been published when the author wrote the doctoral thesis from which the book is the fruit. The author, from a contextualist approach, criticizes the ambivalence in which, in his opinion, Morin's approaches incur on the question of the relationship of science with the social contexts in which it occurs and Morin's tendency to incur in the objectivism. He relates these approaches to the mechanical determinism that Morin –unwisely– attributes to “sociologism” and the sociology of knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Presunción de agencia. Una bolsa de saberes de mujeres ante el castigo penitenciario Salwa El-Shawan Castelo-Branco, Susana Moreno-Fernández y António Medeiros (eds.): Outros celtas. Celtismo, modernidade e música global em Portugal e Espanha. José Luis Solana (coord.): Enseñanza universitaria y practica profesional del trabajo social El espacio de la prostitución Continuidad y fragmentación en un paisaje vitivinícola
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1