罪犯实验中的道德问题。

The American journal of orthopsychiatry Pub Date : 1968-07-01 DOI:10.1111/J.1939-0025.1968.TB02445.X

R. Schwitzgebel

{"title":"罪犯实验中的道德问题。","authors":"R. Schwitzgebel","doi":"10.1111/J.1939-0025.1968.TB02445.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of human beings as subjects for experimentation by scientific investigators raises a multitude of complex and delicate issues. A number of principles have been encoded by medical groups, but there are significant differences between social science experiments and medical ones. The codes, the differences, and some tentative modifications are discussed in this paper.","PeriodicalId":409666,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of orthopsychiatry","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1968-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical problems in experimentation with offenders.\",\"authors\":\"R. Schwitzgebel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1939-0025.1968.TB02445.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of human beings as subjects for experimentation by scientific investigators raises a multitude of complex and delicate issues. A number of principles have been encoded by medical groups, but there are significant differences between social science experiments and medical ones. The codes, the differences, and some tentative modifications are discussed in this paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of orthopsychiatry\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1968-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of orthopsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1939-0025.1968.TB02445.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of orthopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1939-0025.1968.TB02445.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

科学研究者使用人类作为实验对象，引发了许多复杂而微妙的问题。许多原则已经被医学团体编码，但社会科学实验和医学实验之间存在显著差异。本文讨论了它们的规范、区别以及一些尝试性的修改。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Ethical problems in experimentation with offenders.

The use of human beings as subjects for experimentation by scientific investigators raises a multitude of complex and delicate issues. A number of principles have been encoded by medical groups, but there are significant differences between social science experiments and medical ones. The codes, the differences, and some tentative modifications are discussed in this paper.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The American journal of orthopsychiatry

自引率

0.00%

发文量