我的神学家在一套不对称的复式公寓里

Charles W. Taylor
{"title":"我的神学家在一套不对称的复式公寓里","authors":"Charles W. Taylor","doi":"10.1179/JPT.1995.5.1.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to tell you about my theological home and how it informs my work as a pastoral theologian. I dare to do this because I believe that the uniqueness of my home will enrich the discussion of pastoral theology. The steering committee of the Society for Pastoral Theology asked me to give the presentation that forms the basis of this paper at the 10th annual meeting of the Society (June 17, 1994). A member of the committee gave the following working definition to the term theological home: \"The theological sources you use and the way you listen to them.\" Another member said that the committee wanted to know \"what theological vision inspired, directed, and challenged my clinical work and my teaching of pastoral care.\" Further they hoped that the presentation would help others to consider the theological basis of their pastoral care and teaching. Part of the reason that the committee asked me in particular to respond to this question was my race: I am an African Americain who has written about the unique contributions that my heritage brings to pastoral care and pastoral theology (Taylor, 1992). The reason I accepted was that I represented two under-represented theological houses. Most houses have the same components: walls, floors, windows, rooms, furniture. Likewise most theological houses are built of four basic components—scripture, tradition, cultural information (the culture's worldview and knowledge), and the experience of the faithful. The differences between theological houses has to do with the arrangements of these components: Is the biblical floor bare or is it covered with wall-to-wall tradition? Are the windows that let un the culture's light large or small? Are the rooms furnished in traditional oir contemporary style? Is the furniture arranged to facilitate the sharing of experience by the inhabitants? Theological houses are arranged with distinct purposes in mind: to provide refuge, to give a sense of order, to liberate. A house really becomes a home when the inhabitants gather in it and express their life together: a regular family meal, a holiday celebration, the morning rush when everyone leaves for work, school, etc. The characteristic gathering in many theological homes is Sunday worship. As I reflected on the question, \"What is my theological home?\", I began to realize that my theological home was in two quite different theological houses. These houses are bonded together in me and are both reflected in my work. The image that came to me was of two housing units differing in color, size,","PeriodicalId":374661,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Pastoral Theology","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MY THEOLOGICAL HOME IS IN AN ASYMMETRICAL DUPLEX\",\"authors\":\"Charles W. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/JPT.1995.5.1.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article is to tell you about my theological home and how it informs my work as a pastoral theologian. I dare to do this because I believe that the uniqueness of my home will enrich the discussion of pastoral theology. The steering committee of the Society for Pastoral Theology asked me to give the presentation that forms the basis of this paper at the 10th annual meeting of the Society (June 17, 1994). A member of the committee gave the following working definition to the term theological home: \\\"The theological sources you use and the way you listen to them.\\\" Another member said that the committee wanted to know \\\"what theological vision inspired, directed, and challenged my clinical work and my teaching of pastoral care.\\\" Further they hoped that the presentation would help others to consider the theological basis of their pastoral care and teaching. Part of the reason that the committee asked me in particular to respond to this question was my race: I am an African Americain who has written about the unique contributions that my heritage brings to pastoral care and pastoral theology (Taylor, 1992). The reason I accepted was that I represented two under-represented theological houses. Most houses have the same components: walls, floors, windows, rooms, furniture. Likewise most theological houses are built of four basic components—scripture, tradition, cultural information (the culture's worldview and knowledge), and the experience of the faithful. The differences between theological houses has to do with the arrangements of these components: Is the biblical floor bare or is it covered with wall-to-wall tradition? Are the windows that let un the culture's light large or small? Are the rooms furnished in traditional oir contemporary style? Is the furniture arranged to facilitate the sharing of experience by the inhabitants? Theological houses are arranged with distinct purposes in mind: to provide refuge, to give a sense of order, to liberate. A house really becomes a home when the inhabitants gather in it and express their life together: a regular family meal, a holiday celebration, the morning rush when everyone leaves for work, school, etc. The characteristic gathering in many theological homes is Sunday worship. As I reflected on the question, \\\"What is my theological home?\\\", I began to realize that my theological home was in two quite different theological houses. These houses are bonded together in me and are both reflected in my work. The image that came to me was of two housing units differing in color, size,\",\"PeriodicalId\":374661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Pastoral Theology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Pastoral Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/JPT.1995.5.1.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Pastoral Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/JPT.1995.5.1.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这篇文章的目的是告诉你我的神学之家,以及它是如何影响我作为一个教牧神学家的工作的。我之所以敢这样做,是因为我相信我的家的独特性会丰富教牧神学的讨论。牧灵神学学会指导委员会要求我在该学会第十届年会上(1994年6月17日)作报告,构成本文的基础。委员会的一位成员给神学家这个词下了如下的定义:“你使用的神学资料和你听它们的方式。”另一位成员说,委员会想知道“是什么神学异象启发、指导和挑战了我的临床工作和教牧关怀的教学。”此外,他们希望这次演讲能帮助其他人思考他们教牧关怀和教导的神学基础。委员会特别要求我回答这个问题的部分原因是我的种族:我是一个非洲裔美国人,我写过关于我的遗产给教牧关怀和教牧神学带来的独特贡献(Taylor, 1992)。我接受的原因是我代表了两个代表性不足的神学学院。大多数房子都有相同的组成部分:墙壁、地板、窗户、房间、家具。同样地,大多数神学会堂都是由四个基本部分组成的——经文、传统、文化信息(文化的世界观和知识)和信徒的经验。神学房屋之间的差异与这些组成部分的安排有关:圣经地板是裸露的还是覆盖着墙壁的传统?让文化之光进入的窗户是大还是小?房间的陈设是传统的还是现代的?家具的安排是否有利于居民分享经验?神学房屋的安排有不同的目的:提供庇护,给人一种秩序感,解放。当居民聚集在一起表达他们的生活时,房子真正成为了一个家:定期的家庭聚餐,节日庆祝,每个人都去上班,上学等的早晨高峰。许多神学家庭的特色聚会是主日敬拜。当我思考“我的神学家是什么?”这个问题时,我开始意识到我的神学家是在两个完全不同的神学学院里。这些房子在我身上结合在一起,都反映在我的作品中。我脑海中浮现的画面是两个不同颜色、大小的住宅单元,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MY THEOLOGICAL HOME IS IN AN ASYMMETRICAL DUPLEX
The purpose of this article is to tell you about my theological home and how it informs my work as a pastoral theologian. I dare to do this because I believe that the uniqueness of my home will enrich the discussion of pastoral theology. The steering committee of the Society for Pastoral Theology asked me to give the presentation that forms the basis of this paper at the 10th annual meeting of the Society (June 17, 1994). A member of the committee gave the following working definition to the term theological home: "The theological sources you use and the way you listen to them." Another member said that the committee wanted to know "what theological vision inspired, directed, and challenged my clinical work and my teaching of pastoral care." Further they hoped that the presentation would help others to consider the theological basis of their pastoral care and teaching. Part of the reason that the committee asked me in particular to respond to this question was my race: I am an African Americain who has written about the unique contributions that my heritage brings to pastoral care and pastoral theology (Taylor, 1992). The reason I accepted was that I represented two under-represented theological houses. Most houses have the same components: walls, floors, windows, rooms, furniture. Likewise most theological houses are built of four basic components—scripture, tradition, cultural information (the culture's worldview and knowledge), and the experience of the faithful. The differences between theological houses has to do with the arrangements of these components: Is the biblical floor bare or is it covered with wall-to-wall tradition? Are the windows that let un the culture's light large or small? Are the rooms furnished in traditional oir contemporary style? Is the furniture arranged to facilitate the sharing of experience by the inhabitants? Theological houses are arranged with distinct purposes in mind: to provide refuge, to give a sense of order, to liberate. A house really becomes a home when the inhabitants gather in it and express their life together: a regular family meal, a holiday celebration, the morning rush when everyone leaves for work, school, etc. The characteristic gathering in many theological homes is Sunday worship. As I reflected on the question, "What is my theological home?", I began to realize that my theological home was in two quite different theological houses. These houses are bonded together in me and are both reflected in my work. The image that came to me was of two housing units differing in color, size,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Counterstorytelling as an Analytical Framework for Pastoral Research and Anti-racist Pastoral Care and Theology Rebuilding Together Through Buen Vivir : Democratic Collectives and Ecuadorian Liberation Theologies in the Face of the IMF and Disaster Capitalism Postcolonial Images of Spiritual Care: Challenges of Care in a Neoliberal Age Postcolonial Images of Spiritual care: Challenges of Care in a Neoliberal Age , edited by Emmanuel Y. Lartey and Hellena Moon, Eugene, OR, Pickwick Publications, 2020, 215 pp., $24.00 (Soft cover), ISBN: 978-1532685552 Trauma and Transformation The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Theology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1