协作型文件:共同撰写病程记录的治疗师经验

M. Reiter, Vanessa Bibliowicz, Kayleigh Sabo, X. Yu, Yesenia Delgado, Desiree Barrionuevo, Bailey Rich
{"title":"协作型文件:共同撰写病程记录的治疗师经验","authors":"M. Reiter, Vanessa Bibliowicz, Kayleigh Sabo, X. Yu, Yesenia Delgado, Desiree Barrionuevo, Bailey Rich","doi":"10.1521/jsyt.2022.41.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systemic therapy is predicated on a collaborative relationship between therapist and client. This joint pursuit of client goals occurs in the therapy room but may dissolve once the therapist begins filling out any necessary paperwork (e.g., progress notes, biopsychosocial evaluations, or assessments). Collaborative documentation is one means of bringing forth the client's voice during the session and for documentation. Most therapists write progress notes on their own once the session has ended; however, this leads to a privileging of the therapist's voice in the document rather than the client's voice. This article explores collaborative documentation and provides the voices of doctoral student-therapists as they experienced their initial forays into this process. We provide an explanation of how we believe collaborative documentation helped privilege the client's voice, decreased the power imbalance between therapist and client, and provided ideas as to the implementation and use of joint progress note development.","PeriodicalId":245719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systemic Therapies","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative Documentation: Therapist Experiences in Jointly Writing Progress Notes\",\"authors\":\"M. Reiter, Vanessa Bibliowicz, Kayleigh Sabo, X. Yu, Yesenia Delgado, Desiree Barrionuevo, Bailey Rich\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/jsyt.2022.41.2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Systemic therapy is predicated on a collaborative relationship between therapist and client. This joint pursuit of client goals occurs in the therapy room but may dissolve once the therapist begins filling out any necessary paperwork (e.g., progress notes, biopsychosocial evaluations, or assessments). Collaborative documentation is one means of bringing forth the client's voice during the session and for documentation. Most therapists write progress notes on their own once the session has ended; however, this leads to a privileging of the therapist's voice in the document rather than the client's voice. This article explores collaborative documentation and provides the voices of doctoral student-therapists as they experienced their initial forays into this process. We provide an explanation of how we believe collaborative documentation helped privilege the client's voice, decreased the power imbalance between therapist and client, and provided ideas as to the implementation and use of joint progress note development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systemic Therapies\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systemic Therapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2022.41.2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systemic Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2022.41.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

系统治疗以治疗师和来访者之间的合作关系为基础。这种对客户目标的共同追求发生在治疗室,但一旦治疗师开始填写任何必要的文书工作(例如,进度记录,生物心理社会评估或评估),这种共同追求就会消失。协作文档是在会话期间提出客户声音并用于文档的一种方法。大多数治疗师在治疗结束后会自己写进度记录;然而,这导致了治疗师的声音在文件中的特权,而不是客户的声音。本文探讨了协作文档,并提供了博士生治疗师的声音,因为他们经历了最初的尝试进入这个过程。我们提供了一个解释,说明我们如何相信协作文档有助于特权客户的声音,减少治疗师和客户之间的权力不平衡,并提供了关于实施和使用联合进展记录开发的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collaborative Documentation: Therapist Experiences in Jointly Writing Progress Notes
Systemic therapy is predicated on a collaborative relationship between therapist and client. This joint pursuit of client goals occurs in the therapy room but may dissolve once the therapist begins filling out any necessary paperwork (e.g., progress notes, biopsychosocial evaluations, or assessments). Collaborative documentation is one means of bringing forth the client's voice during the session and for documentation. Most therapists write progress notes on their own once the session has ended; however, this leads to a privileging of the therapist's voice in the document rather than the client's voice. This article explores collaborative documentation and provides the voices of doctoral student-therapists as they experienced their initial forays into this process. We provide an explanation of how we believe collaborative documentation helped privilege the client's voice, decreased the power imbalance between therapist and client, and provided ideas as to the implementation and use of joint progress note development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Supporting Physicians During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cumulative Feminist Autoethnography Racism and Friends: The Relevance of Racial Literacy in Clinical Spaces An Introductory Guide to Skillful Therapist Positioning Introduction: An Ethical Stance for Justice-Doing in Community Work and Therapy Using Micro-analyzing Tools to Investigate Therapist Skills in Emotionally Focused Couples Therapy With Couples in a High-Conflict Relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1