人体局部深度边缘检测与深度神经网络

Krista A. Ehinger, E. Graf, W. Adams, J. Elder
{"title":"人体局部深度边缘检测与深度神经网络","authors":"Krista A. Ehinger, E. Graf, W. Adams, J. Elder","doi":"10.1109/ICCVW.2017.316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distinguishing edges caused by a change in depth from other types of edges is an important problem in early vision. We investigate the performance of humans and computer vision models on this task. We use spherical imagery with ground-truth LiDAR range data to build an objective ground-truth dataset for edge classification. We compare various computational models for classifying depth from non-depth edges in small images patches and achieve the best performance (86%) with a convolutional neural network. We investigate human performance on this task in a behavioral experiment and find that human performance is lower than the CNN. Although human and CNN depth responses are correlated, observers' responses are better predicted by other observers than by the CNN. The responses of CNNs and human observers also show a slightly different pattern of correlation with low-level edge cues, which suggests that CNNs and human observers may weight these features differently for classifying edges.","PeriodicalId":149766,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local Depth Edge Detection in Humans and Deep Neural Networks\",\"authors\":\"Krista A. Ehinger, E. Graf, W. Adams, J. Elder\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCVW.2017.316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Distinguishing edges caused by a change in depth from other types of edges is an important problem in early vision. We investigate the performance of humans and computer vision models on this task. We use spherical imagery with ground-truth LiDAR range data to build an objective ground-truth dataset for edge classification. We compare various computational models for classifying depth from non-depth edges in small images patches and achieve the best performance (86%) with a convolutional neural network. We investigate human performance on this task in a behavioral experiment and find that human performance is lower than the CNN. Although human and CNN depth responses are correlated, observers' responses are better predicted by other observers than by the CNN. The responses of CNNs and human observers also show a slightly different pattern of correlation with low-level edge cues, which suggests that CNNs and human observers may weight these features differently for classifying edges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVW.2017.316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVW.2017.316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

区分深度变化引起的边缘和其他类型的边缘是早期视觉中的一个重要问题。我们研究了人类和计算机视觉模型在这个任务上的表现。我们利用球面图像和真地激光雷达距离数据建立了一个客观的真地数据集,用于边缘分类。我们比较了各种计算模型在小图像斑块中从非深度边缘分类深度,并使用卷积神经网络获得了最佳性能(86%)。我们在一个行为实验中调查了人类在这个任务上的表现,发现人类的表现低于CNN。虽然人类和CNN的深度响应是相关的,但观察者的反应被其他观察者比CNN更好地预测。cnn和人类观察者的反应也显示出与低水平边缘线索的关联模式略有不同,这表明cnn和人类观察者在对边缘进行分类时可能对这些特征的权重不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Local Depth Edge Detection in Humans and Deep Neural Networks
Distinguishing edges caused by a change in depth from other types of edges is an important problem in early vision. We investigate the performance of humans and computer vision models on this task. We use spherical imagery with ground-truth LiDAR range data to build an objective ground-truth dataset for edge classification. We compare various computational models for classifying depth from non-depth edges in small images patches and achieve the best performance (86%) with a convolutional neural network. We investigate human performance on this task in a behavioral experiment and find that human performance is lower than the CNN. Although human and CNN depth responses are correlated, observers' responses are better predicted by other observers than by the CNN. The responses of CNNs and human observers also show a slightly different pattern of correlation with low-level edge cues, which suggests that CNNs and human observers may weight these features differently for classifying edges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
UCT: Learning Unified Convolutional Networks for Real-Time Visual Tracking Particle Filter Based Probabilistic Forced Alignment for Continuous Gesture Recognition Ancient Roman Coin Recognition in the Wild Using Deep Learning Based Recognition of Artistically Depicted Face Profiles Propagation of Orientation Uncertainty of 3D Rigid Object to Its Points BEHAVE — Behavioral Analysis of Visual Events for Assisted Living Scenarios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1