表格和表格组织

A. Riggsby
{"title":"表格和表格组织","authors":"A. Riggsby","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190632502.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “tables” of this chapter are matrices whose rows and columns are used systematically to arrange and locate bits of data with respect to two parameters. An extensive survey of documents that might have been expected to take tabular form (mathematical and grammatical reference tools) or even appear to be tables (calendars, accounting records) shows that most of them are in fact one-dimensional lists. Modern research has documented the value of tables as a device to think with, but also has shown that their use is less intuitive than might be imagined in a culture (like ours) which is saturated with them. In the Roman world, by contrast, restriction of certain contexts creates a vicious circle, discouraging further use. The contexts in which tables do appear, like those of the related nested list, involve multiple types of cognitive “scaffolding,” particularly the ongoing use and editing of single documents by one or more users over time.","PeriodicalId":331559,"journal":{"name":"Mosaics of Knowledge","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tables and Tabular Organization\",\"authors\":\"A. Riggsby\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780190632502.003.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The “tables” of this chapter are matrices whose rows and columns are used systematically to arrange and locate bits of data with respect to two parameters. An extensive survey of documents that might have been expected to take tabular form (mathematical and grammatical reference tools) or even appear to be tables (calendars, accounting records) shows that most of them are in fact one-dimensional lists. Modern research has documented the value of tables as a device to think with, but also has shown that their use is less intuitive than might be imagined in a culture (like ours) which is saturated with them. In the Roman world, by contrast, restriction of certain contexts creates a vicious circle, discouraging further use. The contexts in which tables do appear, like those of the related nested list, involve multiple types of cognitive “scaffolding,” particularly the ongoing use and editing of single documents by one or more users over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mosaics of Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mosaics of Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190632502.003.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mosaics of Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190632502.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章的“表”是矩阵,其行和列被系统地用于排列和定位有关两个参数的数据位。对原本可能采用表格形式(数学和语法参考工具)甚至是表格形式(日历、会计记录)的文档进行广泛调查后发现,它们中的大多数实际上是一维列表。现代研究已经证明了桌子作为一种思考工具的价值,但也表明,在一个(像我们这样)充斥着桌子的文化中,桌子的使用并不像想象的那么直观。相比之下,在罗马世界,对某些上下文的限制造成了恶性循环,阻碍了进一步的使用。表确实出现的上下文中,就像相关的嵌套列表一样,涉及到多种类型的认知“脚手架”,特别是一个或多个用户随着时间的推移持续使用和编辑单个文档。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tables and Tabular Organization
The “tables” of this chapter are matrices whose rows and columns are used systematically to arrange and locate bits of data with respect to two parameters. An extensive survey of documents that might have been expected to take tabular form (mathematical and grammatical reference tools) or even appear to be tables (calendars, accounting records) shows that most of them are in fact one-dimensional lists. Modern research has documented the value of tables as a device to think with, but also has shown that their use is less intuitive than might be imagined in a culture (like ours) which is saturated with them. In the Roman world, by contrast, restriction of certain contexts creates a vicious circle, discouraging further use. The contexts in which tables do appear, like those of the related nested list, involve multiple types of cognitive “scaffolding,” particularly the ongoing use and editing of single documents by one or more users over time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Brief Orientation Representing Three Dimensions Tables and Tabular Organization Representing Two Dimensions Lists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1