{"title":"辅导对女性学者有影响吗?文献证据和未来研究指南","authors":"Viviana Meschitti, H. Smith","doi":"10.22381/JRGS7120176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1.IntroductionThe relevance of mentoring to support newcomers and minority groups in organizations has been underlined for decades (Allen et al., 2008; Kram, 1983). Mentoring broadly indicates a relationship where a more expert person - the mentor - provides advice to a less expert one - the mentee. Daloz (2012), referring to the character of Virgil in Dante's Divine Comedy, writes that the mentor's role would be that of \"engendering trust, issuing a challenge, providing encouragement, and offering a vision for the journey\" (Daloz, 2012: 30). There is an aura of mythology around mentoring: the word itself comes from \"Mentor,\" the name of the old sage (personification of the goddess Athena) who took care of the young Telemachus while his father Odysseus was away in the Trojan War.Coming back to the present day, Megginson et al. (2006: 4) define mentoring as, \"off-line help by one person to another in making significant transitions in knowledge, work or thinking.\" Schramm (2004: 64) underlines the developmental aspect of this relationship and adds that the mentor should \"challenge the mentee to go beyond the comfort zone.\" The definition and its extension may appear broad, but they underline the basic features of mentoring. This is that mentoring implies an exclusive relationship in which a more experienced person provides strategic advice to facilitate the professional and personal development of another, less experienced one. When applied to organizations, mentoring should help the mentee to better understand the organizational context and career opportunities, avoid isolation, and access relevant networks. Mullen (2009) noted that the breadth of the definition might be problematic: today the word mentoring is often used interchangeably not only with advising and supervising, but, among others, with coaching, leading, teaching, and socializing, thus making comparisons difficult for scholars and practitioners in studying this process.In this paper, we provide a review of the literature on mentoring, where mentoring is considered as a process to enhance the career trajectory of women in academia and involves a relation beyond supervision, line management and probationary processes. We investigate and clarify the role of mentoring for women academics, and propose a model to guide future research.Academic mentoring is an especially interesting area for building a scholarly contribution. The first literature on mentoring originated in the 1980s, but it was more focused on private organizations than academia. Boyle and Boice (1998) underlined that universities initially showed a \"laissez-faire\" approach, this meaning that, compared to the private sector, they have been less proactive in promoting mentoring. This has implications on scholarly literature as well. Still nowadays, literature on academic mentoring is highly fragmented. This led Zellers et al. (2008) to argue for the need to build a consistent research agenda, better able to investigate the peculiarities of the academic profession.The main factor making mentoring for women important in universities is that academia has been a male environment for centuries (Bagilhole and Goode, 2001): women are still underrepresented at the more senior levels and in some disciplines (usually the fields related to science, technology, mathematics and medicine, STEMM for short) (EC, 2016). This means that women are often excluded from important networks (van den Brink and Benschop, 2014), even if not directly discriminated (Savigny, 2014). Quinlan (1999) earlier pointed out (and still relevant today) how women in academia often engage in very different career paths compared to men, have less continuity in their CV, and experience more stress and greater isolation. Mentoring, therefore as an instrument to support professional development, should be especially useful to ensure a smoother career path for women.The academic profession presents specificities that might challenge the development and uptake of mentoring. …","PeriodicalId":342957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Gender Studies","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Mentoring Make a Difference for Women Academics? Evidence from the Literature and a Guide for Future Research\",\"authors\":\"Viviana Meschitti, H. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.22381/JRGS7120176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1.IntroductionThe relevance of mentoring to support newcomers and minority groups in organizations has been underlined for decades (Allen et al., 2008; Kram, 1983). Mentoring broadly indicates a relationship where a more expert person - the mentor - provides advice to a less expert one - the mentee. Daloz (2012), referring to the character of Virgil in Dante's Divine Comedy, writes that the mentor's role would be that of \\\"engendering trust, issuing a challenge, providing encouragement, and offering a vision for the journey\\\" (Daloz, 2012: 30). There is an aura of mythology around mentoring: the word itself comes from \\\"Mentor,\\\" the name of the old sage (personification of the goddess Athena) who took care of the young Telemachus while his father Odysseus was away in the Trojan War.Coming back to the present day, Megginson et al. (2006: 4) define mentoring as, \\\"off-line help by one person to another in making significant transitions in knowledge, work or thinking.\\\" Schramm (2004: 64) underlines the developmental aspect of this relationship and adds that the mentor should \\\"challenge the mentee to go beyond the comfort zone.\\\" The definition and its extension may appear broad, but they underline the basic features of mentoring. This is that mentoring implies an exclusive relationship in which a more experienced person provides strategic advice to facilitate the professional and personal development of another, less experienced one. When applied to organizations, mentoring should help the mentee to better understand the organizational context and career opportunities, avoid isolation, and access relevant networks. Mullen (2009) noted that the breadth of the definition might be problematic: today the word mentoring is often used interchangeably not only with advising and supervising, but, among others, with coaching, leading, teaching, and socializing, thus making comparisons difficult for scholars and practitioners in studying this process.In this paper, we provide a review of the literature on mentoring, where mentoring is considered as a process to enhance the career trajectory of women in academia and involves a relation beyond supervision, line management and probationary processes. We investigate and clarify the role of mentoring for women academics, and propose a model to guide future research.Academic mentoring is an especially interesting area for building a scholarly contribution. The first literature on mentoring originated in the 1980s, but it was more focused on private organizations than academia. Boyle and Boice (1998) underlined that universities initially showed a \\\"laissez-faire\\\" approach, this meaning that, compared to the private sector, they have been less proactive in promoting mentoring. This has implications on scholarly literature as well. Still nowadays, literature on academic mentoring is highly fragmented. This led Zellers et al. (2008) to argue for the need to build a consistent research agenda, better able to investigate the peculiarities of the academic profession.The main factor making mentoring for women important in universities is that academia has been a male environment for centuries (Bagilhole and Goode, 2001): women are still underrepresented at the more senior levels and in some disciplines (usually the fields related to science, technology, mathematics and medicine, STEMM for short) (EC, 2016). This means that women are often excluded from important networks (van den Brink and Benschop, 2014), even if not directly discriminated (Savigny, 2014). Quinlan (1999) earlier pointed out (and still relevant today) how women in academia often engage in very different career paths compared to men, have less continuity in their CV, and experience more stress and greater isolation. Mentoring, therefore as an instrument to support professional development, should be especially useful to ensure a smoother career path for women.The academic profession presents specificities that might challenge the development and uptake of mentoring. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":342957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Gender Studies\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Gender Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22381/JRGS7120176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Gender Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22381/JRGS7120176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40
摘要
1.导论几十年来,人们一直强调指导对支持组织中的新成员和少数群体的重要性(Allen et al., 2008;Kram, 1983)。指导广义上指的是一种关系,在这种关系中,一个更专业的人——导师——向一个不那么专业的人——被指导者提供建议。达洛兹(Daloz, 2012)在提到但丁的《神曲》中维吉尔的角色时写道,导师的角色将是“产生信任,发出挑战,提供鼓励,并为旅程提供愿景”(达洛兹,2012:30)。“导师”这个词本身就带有神话色彩:这个词来自“导师”,是一位年老的圣人(雅典娜女神的化身)的名字,他在年轻的忒勒马科斯的父亲奥德修斯参加特洛伊战争时照顾他。回到今天,Megginson等人(2006:4)将指导定义为“一个人在知识、工作或思想上做出重大转变时对另一个人的离线帮助。”Schramm(2004: 64)强调了这种关系的发展方面,并补充说导师应该“挑战被指导者走出舒适区”。这个定义和它的延伸可能看起来很宽泛,但是它们强调了指导的基本特征。这就是说,指导意味着一种排他性的关系,在这种关系中,一个更有经验的人提供战略建议,以促进另一个经验较少的人的专业和个人发展。当应用于组织时,指导应该帮助被指导者更好地了解组织背景和职业机会,避免孤立,并进入相关的网络。Mullen(2009)指出,这个定义的广度可能存在问题:如今,“指导”一词不仅经常与建议和监督交替使用,而且还经常与指导、领导、教学和社交交替使用,因此,在研究这一过程时,学者和实践者很难进行比较。在本文中,我们提供了一个文献综述的指导,其中指导被认为是一个过程,以提高女性在学术界的职业轨迹,涉及超越监督,直线管理和试用过程的关系。我们调查并厘清女学者师徒关系的作用,并提出指导未来研究的模式。学术指导是建立学术贡献的一个特别有趣的领域。第一批关于师徒关系的文献起源于20世纪80年代,但它更多地关注于私人组织,而不是学术界。Boyle和Boice(1998)强调,大学最初表现出一种“自由放任”的态度,这意味着,与私营部门相比,它们在促进指导方面不那么积极主动。这对学术文献也有影响。时至今日,关于学术指导的文献仍是高度分散的。这导致Zellers等人(2008)认为需要建立一个一致的研究议程,以便更好地调查学术职业的特殊性。在大学中为女性提供指导之所以重要,主要原因是几个世纪以来,学术界一直是一个男性环境(Bagilhole和Goode, 2001):女性在更高级别和一些学科(通常是与科学、技术、数学和医学相关的领域,简称stem)中的代表性仍然不足(EC, 2016)。这意味着女性经常被排除在重要的网络之外(van den Brink和Benschop, 2014),即使不是直接受到歧视(Savigny, 2014)。Quinlan(1999)早些时候指出(今天仍然适用),与男性相比,学术界的女性通常从事非常不同的职业道路,她们的简历缺乏连续性,并且经历更多的压力和更大的孤立。因此,作为一种支持职业发展的工具,指导对于确保女性的职业道路更加顺畅应该特别有用。学术专业表现出的特殊性可能会挑战指导的发展和吸收。…
Does Mentoring Make a Difference for Women Academics? Evidence from the Literature and a Guide for Future Research
1.IntroductionThe relevance of mentoring to support newcomers and minority groups in organizations has been underlined for decades (Allen et al., 2008; Kram, 1983). Mentoring broadly indicates a relationship where a more expert person - the mentor - provides advice to a less expert one - the mentee. Daloz (2012), referring to the character of Virgil in Dante's Divine Comedy, writes that the mentor's role would be that of "engendering trust, issuing a challenge, providing encouragement, and offering a vision for the journey" (Daloz, 2012: 30). There is an aura of mythology around mentoring: the word itself comes from "Mentor," the name of the old sage (personification of the goddess Athena) who took care of the young Telemachus while his father Odysseus was away in the Trojan War.Coming back to the present day, Megginson et al. (2006: 4) define mentoring as, "off-line help by one person to another in making significant transitions in knowledge, work or thinking." Schramm (2004: 64) underlines the developmental aspect of this relationship and adds that the mentor should "challenge the mentee to go beyond the comfort zone." The definition and its extension may appear broad, but they underline the basic features of mentoring. This is that mentoring implies an exclusive relationship in which a more experienced person provides strategic advice to facilitate the professional and personal development of another, less experienced one. When applied to organizations, mentoring should help the mentee to better understand the organizational context and career opportunities, avoid isolation, and access relevant networks. Mullen (2009) noted that the breadth of the definition might be problematic: today the word mentoring is often used interchangeably not only with advising and supervising, but, among others, with coaching, leading, teaching, and socializing, thus making comparisons difficult for scholars and practitioners in studying this process.In this paper, we provide a review of the literature on mentoring, where mentoring is considered as a process to enhance the career trajectory of women in academia and involves a relation beyond supervision, line management and probationary processes. We investigate and clarify the role of mentoring for women academics, and propose a model to guide future research.Academic mentoring is an especially interesting area for building a scholarly contribution. The first literature on mentoring originated in the 1980s, but it was more focused on private organizations than academia. Boyle and Boice (1998) underlined that universities initially showed a "laissez-faire" approach, this meaning that, compared to the private sector, they have been less proactive in promoting mentoring. This has implications on scholarly literature as well. Still nowadays, literature on academic mentoring is highly fragmented. This led Zellers et al. (2008) to argue for the need to build a consistent research agenda, better able to investigate the peculiarities of the academic profession.The main factor making mentoring for women important in universities is that academia has been a male environment for centuries (Bagilhole and Goode, 2001): women are still underrepresented at the more senior levels and in some disciplines (usually the fields related to science, technology, mathematics and medicine, STEMM for short) (EC, 2016). This means that women are often excluded from important networks (van den Brink and Benschop, 2014), even if not directly discriminated (Savigny, 2014). Quinlan (1999) earlier pointed out (and still relevant today) how women in academia often engage in very different career paths compared to men, have less continuity in their CV, and experience more stress and greater isolation. Mentoring, therefore as an instrument to support professional development, should be especially useful to ensure a smoother career path for women.The academic profession presents specificities that might challenge the development and uptake of mentoring. …