MEC环境下不同保护方案的动态在线VNF放置

Maryam Masoumi, I. de Miguel, R. J. D. Barroso, L. Ruiz, Fabrizio Brasca, Gianluca Rizzi, N. Merayo, J. Aguado, P. Fernández, R. Lorenzo, E. Abril
{"title":"MEC环境下不同保护方案的动态在线VNF放置","authors":"Maryam Masoumi, I. de Miguel, R. J. D. Barroso, L. Ruiz, Fabrizio Brasca, Gianluca Rizzi, N. Merayo, J. Aguado, P. Fernández, R. Lorenzo, E. Abril","doi":"10.1109/ITNAC55475.2022.9998347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) architecture is made up of geographically distributed edge servers so that computing capabilities are provisioned at the network edge, close to the end users. Network Function Virtualization (NFV), when combined with MEC, provides network services in the form of Service Function Chains (SFC) with low latency. In the design of NFV-based 5G networks, the trade-off between the cost of resource deployment and the effective provisioning of services must be considered. In this work, we analyze the impact of having different MEC locations when considering the provision of SFCs in a dynamic scenario (and thus also address VNF placement). In order to deal with infrastructure failures, it is of great importance to employ robust and resilient network strategies. To safeguard SFCs against failures, various protection techniques can be applied. We use two protection methods, namely, dedicated VNF protection and shared VNF protection, under the assumption of single network failures. The operational performances of different approaches are evaluated in terms of blocking ratio and end-to-end delay, both for the whole network and for different services, and we analyze whether it is better to distribute computing servers among a few MEC sites or among a higher number.","PeriodicalId":205731,"journal":{"name":"2022 32nd International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic Online VNF Placement with Different Protection Schemes in a MEC Environment\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Masoumi, I. de Miguel, R. J. D. Barroso, L. Ruiz, Fabrizio Brasca, Gianluca Rizzi, N. Merayo, J. Aguado, P. Fernández, R. Lorenzo, E. Abril\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITNAC55475.2022.9998347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) architecture is made up of geographically distributed edge servers so that computing capabilities are provisioned at the network edge, close to the end users. Network Function Virtualization (NFV), when combined with MEC, provides network services in the form of Service Function Chains (SFC) with low latency. In the design of NFV-based 5G networks, the trade-off between the cost of resource deployment and the effective provisioning of services must be considered. In this work, we analyze the impact of having different MEC locations when considering the provision of SFCs in a dynamic scenario (and thus also address VNF placement). In order to deal with infrastructure failures, it is of great importance to employ robust and resilient network strategies. To safeguard SFCs against failures, various protection techniques can be applied. We use two protection methods, namely, dedicated VNF protection and shared VNF protection, under the assumption of single network failures. The operational performances of different approaches are evaluated in terms of blocking ratio and end-to-end delay, both for the whole network and for different services, and we analyze whether it is better to distribute computing servers among a few MEC sites or among a higher number.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 32nd International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC)\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 32nd International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNAC55475.2022.9998347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 32nd International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNAC55475.2022.9998347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

多访问边缘计算(MEC)架构由地理上分布的边缘服务器组成,以便在靠近最终用户的网络边缘提供计算能力。NFV (Network Function Virtualization)与MEC技术相结合,以SFC (Service Function Chains)的形式提供低时延的网络服务。在基于nfv的5G网络设计中,必须考虑资源部署成本与业务有效提供之间的权衡。在这项工作中,我们分析了在动态场景中考虑提供sfc时拥有不同MEC位置的影响(从而也解决了VNF的放置问题)。为了处理基础设施故障,采用鲁棒性和弹性的网络策略是非常重要的。为了防止sfc发生故障,可以采用各种保护技术。在单网络故障的假设下,我们采用专用VNF保护和共享VNF保护两种保护方式。从阻塞率和端到端延迟两个方面对不同方法的运行性能进行了评估,无论是对于整个网络还是不同的服务,我们分析了在几个MEC站点之间分配计算服务器更好还是在更多的MEC站点之间更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dynamic Online VNF Placement with Different Protection Schemes in a MEC Environment
The Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) architecture is made up of geographically distributed edge servers so that computing capabilities are provisioned at the network edge, close to the end users. Network Function Virtualization (NFV), when combined with MEC, provides network services in the form of Service Function Chains (SFC) with low latency. In the design of NFV-based 5G networks, the trade-off between the cost of resource deployment and the effective provisioning of services must be considered. In this work, we analyze the impact of having different MEC locations when considering the provision of SFCs in a dynamic scenario (and thus also address VNF placement). In order to deal with infrastructure failures, it is of great importance to employ robust and resilient network strategies. To safeguard SFCs against failures, various protection techniques can be applied. We use two protection methods, namely, dedicated VNF protection and shared VNF protection, under the assumption of single network failures. The operational performances of different approaches are evaluated in terms of blocking ratio and end-to-end delay, both for the whole network and for different services, and we analyze whether it is better to distribute computing servers among a few MEC sites or among a higher number.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Channel Sounding Measurements for 5G Campus Networks in Industrial Environments Implementation and Experimental Evaluation of the Rebalancing Algorithm for Folded Clos Networks Architectural Implementation of AES based 5G Security Protocol on FPGA Attribute Verifier for Internet of Things Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-Aided Signal Demodulation in a SiPM-Based VLC System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1