重症肌无力患者重复神经刺激过程中衰减反应的时间

Gloria Ortiz Guerrero, A. Heim, M. Pasnoor, L. Herbelin, Omar Jawdat, Melanie D. Glenn, J. Statland, D. Jabari, C. Farmakidis, R. Barohn
{"title":"重症肌无力患者重复神经刺激过程中衰减反应的时间","authors":"Gloria Ortiz Guerrero, A. Heim, M. Pasnoor, L. Herbelin, Omar Jawdat, Melanie D. Glenn, J. Statland, D. Jabari, C. Farmakidis, R. Barohn","doi":"10.17161/rrnmf.v3i1.15216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A decrement >10% detected during repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) is supportive of considering a diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG). Several studies have found that most of this decrement is seen between 4 to 6 min post-exercise. However, there are not available studies analyzing if shorter timing would be sufficient.   \nObjective: The objective of this study was to evaluate if RNS up to 2 min post-exercise is sufficient to detect a decrement response >10%. \nMethods: We performed a retrospective chart review study of patients referred to our neuromuscular clinic at The University of Kansas Medical Center with symptoms suggestive of MG from 2013 to 2017. \nResults: A total of 76 patients with MG and 100 controls were identified.  A significant decrement was detected in 95% of MG patients with abnormal RNS within 2 minutes post-exercise. \nConclusion: RNS up to 2 min post-exercise might be sufficient to detect a significant decrement in MG patients. ","PeriodicalId":309700,"journal":{"name":"RRNMF Neuromuscular Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing of Decremental Response During Repetitive Nerve Stimulation in Myasthenia Gravis\",\"authors\":\"Gloria Ortiz Guerrero, A. Heim, M. Pasnoor, L. Herbelin, Omar Jawdat, Melanie D. Glenn, J. Statland, D. Jabari, C. Farmakidis, R. Barohn\",\"doi\":\"10.17161/rrnmf.v3i1.15216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: A decrement >10% detected during repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) is supportive of considering a diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG). Several studies have found that most of this decrement is seen between 4 to 6 min post-exercise. However, there are not available studies analyzing if shorter timing would be sufficient.   \\nObjective: The objective of this study was to evaluate if RNS up to 2 min post-exercise is sufficient to detect a decrement response >10%. \\nMethods: We performed a retrospective chart review study of patients referred to our neuromuscular clinic at The University of Kansas Medical Center with symptoms suggestive of MG from 2013 to 2017. \\nResults: A total of 76 patients with MG and 100 controls were identified.  A significant decrement was detected in 95% of MG patients with abnormal RNS within 2 minutes post-exercise. \\nConclusion: RNS up to 2 min post-exercise might be sufficient to detect a significant decrement in MG patients. \",\"PeriodicalId\":309700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RRNMF Neuromuscular Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RRNMF Neuromuscular Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17161/rrnmf.v3i1.15216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RRNMF Neuromuscular Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/rrnmf.v3i1.15216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在重复神经刺激(RNS)中检测到>10%的减少,支持考虑重症肌无力(MG)的诊断。几项研究发现,这种下降主要发生在运动后4到6分钟。然而,目前还没有研究分析更短的时间是否就足够了。目的:本研究的目的是评估运动后2分钟的RNS是否足以检测到10%的衰减反应。方法:我们对2013年至2017年在堪萨斯大学医学中心神经肌肉诊所就诊的伴有MG症状的患者进行了回顾性图表回顾研究。结果:共有76例MG患者和100例对照。95% RNS异常的MG患者在运动后2分钟内出现显著下降。结论:运动后2分钟的RNS可能足以检测MG患者的显著减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Timing of Decremental Response During Repetitive Nerve Stimulation in Myasthenia Gravis
Background: A decrement >10% detected during repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) is supportive of considering a diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG). Several studies have found that most of this decrement is seen between 4 to 6 min post-exercise. However, there are not available studies analyzing if shorter timing would be sufficient.   Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate if RNS up to 2 min post-exercise is sufficient to detect a decrement response >10%. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review study of patients referred to our neuromuscular clinic at The University of Kansas Medical Center with symptoms suggestive of MG from 2013 to 2017. Results: A total of 76 patients with MG and 100 controls were identified.  A significant decrement was detected in 95% of MG patients with abnormal RNS within 2 minutes post-exercise. Conclusion: RNS up to 2 min post-exercise might be sufficient to detect a significant decrement in MG patients. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Survival and multidisciplinary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinic care at a United States Veterans Affairs medical center Recurrent Guillian Barre’ Syndrome vs acute onset CIDP - study of 2 cases. Rhabdomyolysis and Exercise Intolerance in a 45-Year-Old Man A Worsening Problem in ALS: Insurance Barriers Between Drug Approvals and Patient Access Safety and tolerability of phenylbutyrate in inclusion body myositis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1